| Literature DB >> 30200625 |
Ran An1, Zhuang Hou2, Jian-Teng Li3, Hao-Nan Yu4, Yan-Hua Mou5, Chun Guo6.
Abstract
Herein, fifteen new compounds containing coumarin, 1,2,3-triazole and benzoyl- substituted arylamine moieties were designed, synthesized and tested in vitro for their anticancer activity. The results showed that all tested compounds had moderate antiproliferative activity against MDA-MB-231, a human breast cancer cell line, under both normoxic and hypoxic conditions. Furthermore, the 4-substituted coumarin linked with benzoyl 3,4-dimethoxyaniline through 1,2,3-triazole (compound 5e) displayed the most prominent antiproliferative activities with an IC50 value of 0.03 μM, about 5000 times stronger than 4-hydroxycoumarin (IC50 > 100 μM) and 20 times stronger than doxorubicin (IC50 = 0.60 μM). Meanwhile, almost all compounds revealed general enhancement of proliferation-inhibiting activity under hypoxia, contrasted with normoxia. A docking analysis showed that compound 5e had potential to inhibit carbonic anhydrase IX (CA IX).Entities:
Keywords: 1,2,3-triazole; anticancer; coumarin; hypoxia
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30200625 PMCID: PMC6225359 DOI: 10.3390/molecules23092281
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Structures of some 4-substituted coumarins. (A) the coumarins attached an iodinated aromatic ring. (B) the coumarin linked 6-methylpyridine. (C) the hybrid of 1,2,3-triazole and 4-subsitituted coumarin. (D) 4-substituted coumarins reported by supuran group.
Figure 2Structures of some benzanilide. (A) compounds reported by Su group. (B) compounds reported by Yang et al.
Figure 3Rationale design of the title compounds.
Scheme 1Synthesis of compounds 5a–5o. Reagents and conditions: (a) Propargyl bromide, K2CO3, DMF, r.t., 4 h; (b) NaNO2, HCl, 0.5 h, NaN3, 0.5 h; (c) CuI, Et3N, DCM, r.t., 3 h; (d) SOCl2, 1.5 h; (e) RNH2, DCM, 2 h.
IC50 of the compounds against MDA-MB-231 cell.
| Compd. | R | IC50 (Μm) a | IC50, normoxia/IC50, hypoxia b | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hypoxia | Normoxic | |||
|
|
| 23.47 | 24.41 | 1.04 |
|
|
| 8.14 | 108.72 | 13.36 |
|
|
| 75.21 | 73.77 | 0.98 |
|
|
| 6.72 | 6.78 | 1.01 |
|
|
| 0.03 | 1.34 | 46.31 |
|
|
| 73.82 | 91.61 | 1.24 |
|
|
| 53.98 | 62.79 | 1.16 |
|
|
| 3.44 | 18.45 | 5.36 |
|
|
| 20.35 | 20.98 | 1.03 |
|
|
| 12.87 | 12.28 | 0.95 |
|
|
| 8.70 | 10.86 | 1.25 |
|
|
| 1.30 | 7.03 | 5.39 |
|
|
| 0.25 | 5.06 | 20.46 |
|
|
| 34.82 | 39.58 | 1.14 |
|
|
| 9.42 | 16.76 | 1.78 |
| DOX | 0.60 | 1.07 | 1.79 | |
| 4.68 | 7.87 | 1.68 | ||
| 4-hydroxycoumarin | >100 | >100 | ||
a Values are the average of three independent experiments. Relative errors are generally within 5–10%. b A higher IC50, normoxia/IC50, hypoxia indicates more antiproliferative activity in hypoxic conditions.
Figure 4Interaction diagrams of the selected docked conformations for hydrolyzed compound 5e inside the active site of CA IX enzyme. (a) The surface representation of binding pocket has been shown at the top of the figure. (b) 3D ligand interactions diagram. (c) 2D ligand interactions diagram. (d) The ligand of this docking analysis.