Literature DB >> 30199821

Microclimate: A critical review in the context of pressure ulcer prevention.

Jan Kottner1, Joyce Black2, Evan Call3, Amit Gefen4, Nick Santamaria5.   

Abstract

Pressure ulcers are caused by sustained mechanical loading and deformation of the skin and subcutaneous layers between internal stiff anatomical structures and external surfaces or devices. In addition, the skin microclimate (temperature, humidity and airflow next to the skin surface) is an indirect pressure ulcer risk factor. Temperature and humidity affect the structure and function of the skin increasing or lowering possible damage thresholds for the skin and underlying soft tissues. From a pressure ulcer prevention research perspective, the effects of humidity and temperature next to the skin surface are inextricably linked to concurrent soft tissue deformation. Direct clinical evidence supporting the association between microclimate and pressure ulceration is sparse and of high risk of bias. Currently, it is recommended to keep the skin dry and cool and/or to allow recovery periods between phases of occlusion. The stratum corneum must be prevented from becoming overhydrated or from drying out but exact ranges of an acceptable microclimate are unknown. Therefore, vague terms like 'microclimate management' should be avoided but product and microclimate characteristics should be explicitly stated to allow an informed decision making. Pressure ulcer prevention interventions like repositioning, the use of special support surfaces, cushions, and prophylactic dressings are effective only if they reduce sustained deformations in soft tissues. This mode of action outweighs possible undesirable microclimate properties. As long as uncertainty exists efforts must be taken to use as less occlusive materials as possible. There seems to be individual intrinsic characteristics making patients more vulnerable to microclimate effects.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Epidermis; Microclimate; Pressure ulcer; Skin; Stratum corneum hydration; Transepidermal water loss

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30199821     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2018.09.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)        ISSN: 0268-0033            Impact factor:   2.063


  23 in total

1.  A prospective, randomised controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of the fluid immersion simulation system vs an air-fluidised bed system in the acute postoperative management of pressure ulcers: A midpoint study analysis.

Authors:  Rafael A Mendoza; Gabriella A Lorusso; Daniela A Ferrer; Irene B Helenowski; Jing Liu; Rachna H Soriano; Robert D Galiano
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 3.315

2.  The biomechanical efficacy of a dressing with a soft cellulose fluff core in prophylactic use.

Authors:  Amit Gefen; Maja Krämer; Maik Brehm; Sören Burckardt
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2020-08-31       Impact factor: 3.315

3.  Pressure ulcer Cat. II-IV incidence on the CuroCell S.A.M. PRO powered reactive air support surface in a high-risk population: A multicentre cohort study in 12 Belgian nursing homes.

Authors:  Elien Zwaenepoel; Ann Van Hecke; Bénédicte Manderlier; Sofie Verhaeghe; Dimitri Beeckman
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 3.315

4.  Prediction of Diabetic Foot Ulceration: The Value of Using Microclimate Sensor Arrays.

Authors:  Petra Jones; Richard Bibb; Melanie Davies; Kamlesh Khunti; Matthew McCarthy; David Webb; Francesco Zaccardi
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2019-10-09

5.  Dressings cut to shape alleviate facial tissue loads while using an oxygen mask.

Authors:  Lea Peko Cohen; Zehava Ovadia-Blechman; Oshrit Hoffer; Amit Gefen
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 3.315

6.  Release of sodium pyruvate from sacral prophylactic dressings: A computational model.

Authors:  Ayelet Levy; Jan Kottner; Amit Gefen
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 3.315

7.  The biomechanical efficacy of a hydrogel-based dressing in preventing facial medical device-related pressure ulcers.

Authors:  Angela Grigatti; Amit Gefen
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2021-10-08       Impact factor: 3.099

8.  Relationship between a pressure redistributing foam mattress and pressure injuries: An observational prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Dorothy Li Bai; Tsai-Wen Liu; Hsiu-Ling Chou; Yeh-Liang Hsu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Personal protective equipment related skin reactions in healthcare professionals during COVID-19.

Authors:  Nkemjika Abiakam; Peter Worsley; Hemalatha Jayabal; Kay Mitchell; Michaela Jones; Jacqui Fletcher; Fran Spratt; Dan Bader
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 3.099

10.  The Effect of Support Surfaces on the Incidence of Pressure Injuries in Critically Ill Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Wesley Henrique Bueno de Camargo; Rita de Cassia Pereira; Marcos T Tanita; Lidiane Heko; Isadora C Grion; Josiane Festti; Ana Luiza Mezzaroba; Cintia Magalhães Carvalho Grion
Journal:  Crit Care Res Pract       Date:  2018-12-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.