| Literature DB >> 30198494 |
Fabiana A de Oliveira1, Waldemar S Costa1, Francisco J B Sampaio1, Bianca M Gregorio1.
Abstract
High-fat diets affect male reproduction and sexual function. Therefore, we evaluated the effects of prolonged resveratrol administration on the metabolic, sperm, and testicular parameters of rats fed a cafeteria diet. Male Wistar rats were divided at weaning into control (C, n = 20) and cafeteria (CAF, n = 16) groups. At 3 months, half of them were given daily supplementations of resveratrol (C-R, n = 10; CAF-R, n = 8) at a dosage of 30 mg kg-1 body mass for 2 months. Animals were killed at 5 months of age, and blood, spermatozoa, and testes were collected for further analysis. Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA, and P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The CAF diet promoted hyperglycemia (P < 0.0001), and treatment with resveratrol reversed this condition (P < 0.0001). The CAF diet reduced sperm viability and motility, while resveratrol improved these parameters (P < 0.05). Regarding testicular morphology, the height of the seminiferous epithelium was reduced in the CAF group compared with that of the C group (P = 0.0007). Spermatogenic cell proliferation was also reduced in the CAF group compared with that of the C group. However, the CAF-R showed an increase in cell proliferation rate compared with that of the untreated CAF group (P = 0.0024). Although it did not modify body mass, the consumption of a CAF diet promoted hyperglycemia, adverse testicular morphology remodeling, and abnormal sperm, which were attenuated by treatment with resveratrol, thus suggesting a protective effect of this antioxidant on spermatogenesis.Entities:
Keywords: cafeteria diet; morphology; resveratrol; spermatozoa; testicle
Year: 2019 PMID: 30198494 PMCID: PMC6413558 DOI: 10.4103/aja.aja_67_18
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Asian J Androl ISSN: 1008-682X Impact factor: 3.285
Data of experimental groups at 5 months of age
| Retroperitoneal fat (g) | 5.02±1.26 | 9.41±3.27a | 4.41±1.70 | 8.39±4.54 | 0.0042 |
| Subcutaneous fat (g) | 2.85±0.86 | 4.36±1.38 | 4.14±1.40 | 5.12±2.44a | 0.0322 |
| Epididymal fat (g) | 5.43±1.15 | 7.41±1.77 | 5.91±1.74 | 6.35±3.05 | 0.2156 |
| Right testicle weight (g) | 1.86±0.16 | 1.88±0.11 | 2.03±0.21 | 1.95±0.15 | 0.1430 |
| Right testicle volume (ml) | 1.79±0.12 | 1.85±0.12 | 1.95±0.16 | 1.91±0.13 | 0.0706 |
| Left testicle weight (g) | 1.84±0.17 | 1.89±0.12 | 2.03±0.17 | 1.98±0.15 | 0.0707 |
| Left testicle volume (ml) | 1.80±1.80 | 1.84±1.83 | 1.91±1.91 | 1.95±1.95 | 0.2940 |
Data are presented as mean±s.d. Differences were tested by ANOVA and Bonferroni post hoc test. P<0.05. aThe indicated group versus C group. C: control diet; CAF: cafeteria diet; C-R: control diet treated with resveratrol; CAF-R: cafeteria diet treated with resveratrol; ANOVA: analysis of variance; s.d.: standard deviation
Blood biochemistry
| OGTT before-resveratrol (u.a.) | 746.00±44.80 | 876.40±65.90a | NA | NA | <0.0001 |
| OGTT after-resveratrol (u.a.) | 745.00±42.84 | 869.50±67.21a | 643.10±33.12a | 728.00±58.09b | <0.0001 |
| Cholesterol total (mg dl−1) | 59.89±5.64 | 60.75±8.01 | 64.22±8.01 | 57.00±12.65 | 0.1810 |
| Triacylglycerol (mg dl−1) | 85.60±29.51 | 103.80±38.69 | 30.44±12.89a | 66.38±41.76 | 0.0003 |
| Glucose (mmol l−1) | 10.47±4.32 | 16.22±5.62a | 8.79±2.56 | 9.12±2.45b | 0.0023 |
| HDL (mg dl−1) | 38.90±7.01 | 40.44±7.00 | 35.44±6.44 | 33.80±6.26 | 0.1382 |
| VLDL (mg dl−1) | 17.10±6.97 | 20.78±8.02 | 6.11±2.80a | 17.60±11.82c | 0.0025 |
| Insulin (ng ml−1) | 3.92±1.58 | 6.37±0.75 | 2.22±0.79 | 2.27±1.95b | 0.0001 |
| Testosterone (ng ml−1) | 10.09±0.67 | 10.30±1.02 | 10.96±1.12 | 10.65±1.46 | 0.5206 |
Data are presented as mean±s.d. The differences were tested by ANOVA and Bonferroni post hoc test. P<0.05. aThe indicated group versus C group; bThe indicated group versus CAF group; and cThe indicated group versus C-R group. C: control diet; CAF: cafeteria diet; C-R: control diet treated with resveratrol; CAF-R: cafeteria diet treated with resveratrol. OGTT: oral glucose tolerance test; HDL: high-density lipoprotein; VLDL: very-low-density lipoprotein; ANOVA: analysis of variance; s.d.: standard deviation; NA: not applicable
Spermatozoa and testicle parameters
| Spermatozoa concentration (×104 ml−1) | 10.00±0.39 | 10.00±0.32 | 10.00±0.33 | 11.00±0.19 | 0.7832 |
| Spermatozoa motility (%) | 47.82±19.17 | 9.28±8.63a | 49.25±10.06 | 40.86±6.96b | <0.0001 |
| Spermatozoa viability (%) | 7.10±3.24 | 3.33±2.33a | 7.38±2.74 | 7.25±1.53b | 0.0052 |
| Diameter of the seminiferous tubules (μm) | 281.10±6.90 | 280.30±10.95 | 285.80±16.32 | 269.40±13.63 | 0.0720 |
| Seminiferous epithelium | |||||
| Height (μm) | 56.33±3.44 | 37.27±8.39a | 58.23±2.82 | 53.25±8.14 | 0.0007 |
| Vv (%) | 45.24±2.20 | 40.03±1.86a | 40.63±1.14a | 42.43±1.66a | <0.0001 |
| Av (ml) | 0.83±0.06 | 0.73±0.05 | 0.78±0.09 | 0.81±0.06 | 0.0609 |
| Tubular lumen | |||||
| Vv (%) | 33.81±2.37 | 33.70±2.73 | 40.62±1.68a | 37.50±2.22a, b | <0.0001 |
| Av (ml) | 0.61±0.09 | 0.62±0.06 | 0.74±0.11a | 0.72±0.072 | 0.0074 |
| Tunica propria | |||||
| Vv (%) | 5.99±1.34 | 6.51±1.25 | 5.03±0.78 | 5.92±0.88 | 0.0867 |
| Av (ml) | 0.10±0.02 | 0.12±0.03 | 0.09±0.02 | 0.11±0.01 | 0.1095 |
| Tubular compartment | |||||
| Vv (%) | 85.04±1.72 | 81.22±2.43a | 87.22±1.23 | 85.38±2.40b | <0.0001 |
| Av (ml) | 1.54±0.17 | 1.49±0.10 | 1.65±0.26 | 1.65±0.12 | 0.1979 |
| Blood vessels | |||||
| Vv (%) | 0.72±0.29 | 0.63±0.09 | 0.70±0.38 | 0.98±0.39 | 0.1395 |
| Av (ml) | 0.01±0.01 | 0.01±0.00 | 0.01±0.00 | 0.01±0.01 | 0.0643 |
| Stroma | |||||
| Vv (%) | 7.92±0.89 | 7.92±0.76 | 7.29±0.69 | 7.92±0.99 | 0.2372 |
| Av (ml) | 0.14±0.02 | 0.15±0.01 | 0.13±0.02 | 0.15±0.01 | 0.4936 |
| Intertubular compartment | |||||
| Vv (%) | 8.65±0.99 | 8.54±0.47 | 7.75±0.54 | 8.56±0.78 | 0.0755 |
| Av (ml) | 0.15±0.02 | 0.16±0.01 | 0.14±0.02 | 0.17±0.02 | 0.2188 |
| Cell proliferation (cells per mm²) | 2102.00±352.70 | 1386.00±177.30a | 1750.00±278.50 | 2605.00±1436.00b | 0.0024 |
Data are presented as mean±s.d. Differences were tested by ANOVA and Bonferroni post hoc test. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. aThe indicated group versus C group and bthe indicated group versus CAF group. C: control diet; CAF: cafeteria diet; C-R: control diet treated with resveratrol; CAF-R: cafeteria diet treated with resveratrol; ANOVA: analysis of variance; s.d.: standard deviation; Vv: volume density; Av: absolute volume