Literature DB >> 30196998

Ventricular tachycardia ablation in structural heart disease: Impact of ablation strategy and non-inducibility as an end-point on long term outcome.

Alexander Breitenstein1, Vinit Sawhney1, Rui Providencia1, Shohreh Honarbakhsh1, Waqas Ullah1, Mehul B Dhinoja1, Richard J Schilling1, Girish G Babu1, Anthony Chow1, Pier Lambiase1, Kim Rajappan2, Manish Kalla2, Mark Cassar2, Mark Hall3, Ian P Temple3, Stefano Bartoletti3, Sandeep Panikker4, Andrew Kontogeorgis4, Tom Wong4, Ross J Hunter5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To investigate the long term outcomes after catheter ablation (CA) of ventricular tachycardia (VT) in the context of structural heart disease in a multicenter cohort. The impact of different ablation strategies (substrate ablation versus activation guided versus combined) and non-inducibility as an end-point was evaluated.
METHODS: Data was pooled from prospective registries at 5 centres over a 5 year period. Success was defined as survival free from recurrent ventricular arrhythmias (VA). Multivariate analysis of factors predicting survival free from VA was analysed by Cox regression.
RESULTS: Five hundred sixty-six patients underwent CA for VT. Patients were 64 ± 15 years. Left ventricular ejection fraction was 35 ± 15% and 66% had ischaemic heart disease. At 2.3 (IQR 1.0-4.2) years, success was achieved in 44% after a single procedure, rising to 60% after repeat procedures. Mortality at final follow up was 22%. Multivariate analysis showed that higher left ventricular ejection fraction, younger age, ischaemic heart disease, and non-inducibility of VA predicted long term survival free from VA (all p < 0.05). There was no impact of the approach to ablation.
CONCLUSION: CA eliminates VT in a large proportion of patients long term. Ablation strategy did not impact outcome and hence substrate ablation is a reasonable initial strategy. Non-inducibility of VA predicted survival free from VA and may be worth pursuing as a procedural end-point.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Catheter ablation; Outcome; Ventricular tachycardia

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30196998     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.08.099

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiol        ISSN: 0167-5273            Impact factor:   4.164


  4 in total

1.  Cost-effectiveness of ablation of ventricular tachycardia in ischaemic cardiomyopathy: limitations in the trial evidence base.

Authors:  Yang Chen; Manuel Gomes; Jason V Garcia; Ross J Hunter; Anthony W Chow; Mehul Dhinoja; Richard J Schilling; Martin Lowe; Pier D Lambiase
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2020-01-28

Review 2.  Dynamic High-density Functional Substrate Mapping Improves Outcomes in Ischaemic Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation: Sense Protocol Functional Substrate Mapping and Other Functional Mapping Techniques.

Authors:  Nikolaos Papageorgiou; Neil T Srinivasan
Journal:  Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev       Date:  2021-04

3.  Multicenter Study of Dynamic High-Density Functional Substrate Mapping Improves Identification of Substrate Targets for Ischemic Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation.

Authors:  Neil T Srinivasan; Jason Garcia; Richard J Schilling; Syed Ahsan; Girish G Babu; Richard Ang; Mehul B Dhinoja; Ross J Hunter; Martin Lowe; Anthony W Chow; Pier D Lambiase
Journal:  JACC Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2020-09-16

4.  Dynamic spatial dispersion of repolarization is present in regions critical for ischemic ventricular tachycardia ablation.

Authors:  Neil T Srinivasan; Jason Garcia; Richard J Schilling; Syed Ahsan; Ross J Hunter; Martin Lowe; Anthony W Chow; Pier D Lambiase
Journal:  Heart Rhythm O2       Date:  2021-05-11
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.