Literature DB >> 30196962

Effect of transfer of a poor quality embryo along with a top quality embryo on the outcome during fresh and frozen in vitro fertilization cycles.

Samuel James Alexander Dobson1, Maria Teresita Lao2, Essam Michael2, Alex C Varghese2, Kannamannadiar Jayaprakasan3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of a poor quality embryo (PQE) during double ET (DET) with a top quality embryo (TQE) on IVF outcome.
DESIGN: A review of prospectively collected data.
SETTING: Tertiary level fertility clinic. PATIENT(S): All patients undergoing blastocyst transfers as part of fresh IVF (n = 939) and frozen ET (n = 1,009) cycles performed between 2010 and 2016. INTERVENTION(S): Single ET (SET) with TQE (group 1) was set as control and compared with outcomes for SET with PQE (group 2), DET with 2 TQEs (group 3), PQE plus TQE (group 4), and 2 PQE (group 5). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Live births and multiple births. RESULT(S): The live birth rates for group 4 were statistically similar to group 1 during fresh IVF (26.5% vs. 33.7%; odds ratio [OR], 0.95; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.53-1.7) and frozen ET (24.2% vs. 32.7%; OR, 0.75; 95% CI 0.48-1.2), although there was a trend for lower success. Conversely, multiple births were higher in group 4 for fresh IVF (19% vs. 4.7%; OR, 2.9; 95% CI 1.3-6.6) and frozen ET (10.3% vs. 2.6%; OR, 2.4; 95% CI 1.2-4.9). The live birth rates for group 2 (12.2% for fresh IVF and 14.6% for frozen ET) and group 5 (21.2% for fresh IVF and 14% for frozen ET) were lower and for group 3 were higher (40.8% for fresh IVF and 40.3% for frozen ET) when compared with group 1. Multiple births were significantly higher with DET. CONCLUSION(S): This study does not support DET with one PQE along with a TQE, when there is only one TQE and one or more PQEs available for fresh IVF or frozen ET. Crown
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  In vitro fertilization; blastocyst; double embryo transfer; multiple pregnancy; single embryo transfer

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30196962     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.05.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  11 in total

1.  Morula transfer achieves better clinical outcomes than post-thawed cleavage embryos after overnight culture in frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles.

Authors:  Dongna Hui; Xiaofang Han; Xiaocheng Wang; Wenjuan Ren; Xin Lei; Jianrong Liu; Lina Dong; Hong Li
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Thawing day 3 embryos and culturing to day 5 may be a better method for frozen embryo transfer.

Authors:  Roni Rahav-Koren; Shmuel Inbar; Netanella Miller; Amir Wiser; Yael Yagur; Chen Berkowitz; Sivan Farladansky-Gershnabel; Adrian Shulman; Arie Berkowitz
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-09-22       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  The Association Between Embryo Quality, Number of Transferred Embryos and Live Birth Rate After Vitrified Cleavage-Stage Embryos and Blastocyst Transfer.

Authors:  Qianqian Zhu; Jiaying Lin; Haoyuan Gao; Ningling Wang; Bian Wang; Yun Wang
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2020-08-14       Impact factor: 4.566

4.  What Are the Live Birth and Multiple Pregnancy Rates When 1 Versus 2 Low-Quality Blastocysts Are Transferred in a Cryopreserved Cycle? a Retrospective Cohort Study, Stratified for Age, Embryo Quality, and Oocyte Donor Cycles.

Authors:  Suha Arab; Ahmad Badegiesh; Sarah Aldhaheri; Weon-Young Son; Michael H Dahan
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 3.060

5.  Poor Embryo Quality Is Associated With A Higher Risk of Low Birthweight in Vitrified-Warmed Single Embryo Transfer Cycles.

Authors:  Jiaan Huang; Yu Tao; Jie Zhang; Xiaoyan Yang; Jiayi Wu; Yanping Kuang; Yun Wang
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 4.566

6.  Effect of blastocyst morphology and developmental speed on transfer strategy for grade "C" blastocyst in vitrified-warmed cycles.

Authors:  Yuxia He; Shiping Chen; Jianqiao Liu; Xiangjin Kang; Haiying Liu
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 4.234

7.  Prolonged Cryopreservation Negatively Affects Embryo Transfer Outcomes Following the Elective Freeze-All Strategy: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Xudong Zhang; Shanshan Wu; Guimin Hao; Xueqing Wu; Haiqin Ren; Yinfeng Zhang; Aimin Yang; Xingyu Bi; Lina Bai; Yunshan Zhang; Jichun Tan
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-09-22       Impact factor: 5.555

8.  Comparisons of benefits and risks of single embryo transfer versus double embryo transfer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shujuan Ma; Yangqin Peng; Liang Hu; Xiaojuan Wang; Yiquan Xiong; Yi Tang; Jing Tan; Fei Gong
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 5.211

9.  Does the transfer of a poor quality embryo with a good quality embryo benefit poor prognosis patients?

Authors:  Wenjie Wang; Jiali Cai; Lanlan Liu; Yingpei Xu; Zhenfang Liu; Jinghua Chen; Xiaoming Jiang; Xiaohua Sun; Jianzhi Ren
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 5.211

10.  Effect of Day 3 and Day 5/6 Embryo Quality on the Reproductive Outcomes in the Single Vitrified Embryo Transfer Cycles.

Authors:  Ningling Wang; Xinxi Zhao; Meng Ma; Qianqian Zhu; Yao Wang
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 5.555

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.