Literature DB >> 30196934

Cancer epidemiology update, following the 2011 IARC evaluation of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (Monograph 102).

Anthony B Miller1, L Lloyd Morgan2, Iris Udasin3, Devra Lee Davis4.   

Abstract

Epidemiology studies (case-control, cohort, time trend and case studies) published since the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) 2011 categorization of radiofrequency radiation (RFR) from mobile phones and other wireless devices as a possible human carcinogen (Group 2B) are reviewed and summarized. Glioma is an important human cancer found to be associated with RFR in 9 case-control studies conducted in Sweden and France, as well as in some other countries. Increasing glioma incidence trends have been reported in the UK and other countries. Non-malignant endpoints linked include acoustic neuroma (vestibular Schwannoma) and meningioma. Because they allow more detailed consideration of exposure, case-control studies can be superior to cohort studies or other methods in evaluating potential risks for brain cancer. When considered with recent animal experimental evidence, the recent epidemiological studies strengthen and support the conclusion that RFR should be categorized as carcinogenic to humans (IARC Group 1). Opportunistic epidemiological studies are proposed that can be carried out through cross-sectional analyses of high, medium, and low mobile phone users with respect to hearing, vision, memory, reaction time, and other indicators that can easily be assessed through standardized computer-based tests. As exposure data are not uniformly available, billing records should be used whenever available to corroborate reported exposures.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brain cancer; Cell phones; Electric hypersensitivity; Glioma; Meningioma; Mobile phones; Radio frequency fields; Salivary gland tumor; Vestibular schwannoma

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30196934     DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2018.06.043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Res        ISSN: 0013-9351            Impact factor:   6.498


  9 in total

1.  Genetic susceptibility may modify the association between cell phone use and thyroid cancer: A population-based case-control study in Connecticut.

Authors:  Jiajun Luo; Hang Li; Nicole C Deziel; Huang Huang; Nan Zhao; Shuangge Ma; Xin Ni; Robert Udelsman; Yawei Zhang
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2019-12-06       Impact factor: 6.498

2.  Do Cell Phones Cause Brain Tumors? Another Piece of the Puzzle.

Authors:  Douglas L Weed
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 11.816

3.  Immune Responses to Multi-Frequencies of 1.5 GHz and 4.3 GHz Microwave Exposure in Rats: Transcriptomic and Proteomic Analysis.

Authors:  Li Zhao; Chuanfu Yao; Hui Wang; Ji Dong; Jing Zhang; Xinping Xu; Haoyu Wang; Binwei Yao; Ke Ren; Liu Sun; Ruiyun Peng
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 6.208

Review 4.  Human‑made electromagnetic fields: Ion forced‑oscillation and voltage‑gated ion channel dysfunction, oxidative stress and DNA damage (Review).

Authors:  Dimitris J Panagopoulos; Andreas Karabarbounis; Igor Yakymenko; George P Chrousos
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  2021-10-07       Impact factor: 5.650

5.  Appeals that matter or not on a moratorium on the deployment of the fifth generation, 5G, for microwave radiation.

Authors:  Lennart Hardell; Rainer Nyberg
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-01-22

6.  The Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in Diagnostics of Acoustic Schwannoma.

Authors:  Serbeze Kabashi; Mehmet Sahin Ugurel; Kreshnike Dedushi; Sefedin Mucaj
Journal:  Acta Inform Med       Date:  2020-12

Review 7.  The Critical Importance of Molecular Biomarkers and Imaging in the Study of Electrohypersensitivity. A Scientific Consensus International Report.

Authors:  Dominique Belpomme; George L Carlo; Philippe Irigaray; David O Carpenter; Lennart Hardell; Michael Kundi; Igor Belyaev; Magda Havas; Franz Adlkofer; Gunnar Heuser; Anthony B Miller; Daniela Caccamo; Chiara De Luca; Lebrecht von Klitzing; Martin L Pall; Priyanka Bandara; Yael Stein; Cindy Sage; Morando Soffritti; Devra Davis; Joel M Moskowitz; S M J Mortazavi; Martha R Herbert; Hanns Moshammer; Gerard Ledoigt; Robert Turner; Anthony Tweedale; Pilar Muñoz-Calero; Iris Udasin; Tarmo Koppel; Ernesto Burgio; André Vander Vorst
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 8.  Theoretical Concepts in Magnetobiology after 40 Years of Research.

Authors:  Vladimir N Binhi; Andrei B Rubin
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 6.600

9.  Mapping of static magnetic fields near the surface of mobile phones.

Authors:  L Zastko; L Makinistian; A Tvarožná; F L Ferreyra; I Belyaev
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-09-24       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.