Literature DB >> 31918310

Genetic susceptibility may modify the association between cell phone use and thyroid cancer: A population-based case-control study in Connecticut.

Jiajun Luo1, Hang Li2, Nicole C Deziel1, Huang Huang1, Nan Zhao3, Shuangge Ma4, Xin Ni5, Robert Udelsman6, Yawei Zhang7.   

Abstract

Emerging studies have provided evidence on the carcinogenicity of radiofrequency radiation (RFR) from cell phones. This study aims to test the genetic susceptibility on the association between cell phone use and thyroid cancer. Population-based case-control study was conducted in Connecticut between 2010 and 2011 including 440 thyroid cancer cases and 465 population-based controls with genotyping information for 823 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in 176 DNA genes. We used multivariate unconditional logistic regression models to estimate the genotype-environment interaction between each SNP and cell phone use and to estimate the association with cell phone use in populations according to SNP variants. Ten SNPs had P < 0.01 for interaction in all thyroid cancers. In the common homozygote groups, no association with cell phone use was observed. In the variant group (heterozygotes and rare homozygotes), cell phone use was associated with an increased risk for rs11070256 (odds ratio (OR): 2.36, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.30-4.30), rs1695147 (OR: 2.52, 95% CI: 1.30-4.90), rs6732673 (OR: 1.59, 95% CI: 1.01-2.49), rs396746 (OR: 2.53, 95% CI: 1.13-5.65), rs12204529 (OR: 2.62, 95% CI: 1.33-5.17), and rs3800537 (OR: 2.64, 95% CI: 1.30-5.36) with thyroid cancers. In small tumors, increased risk was observed for 5 SNPs (rs1063639, rs1695147, rs11070256, rs12204529 and rs3800537), In large tumors, increased risk was observed for 3 SNPs (rs11070256, rs1695147, and rs396746). Our result suggests that genetic susceptibilities modify the associations between cell phone use and risk of thyroid cancer. The findings provide more evidence for RFR carcinogenic group classification.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cell phone; Genetic susceptible; Genetic-environment interaction; Radiofrequency radiation; Thyroid cancer

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31918310      PMCID: PMC7061309          DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2019.109013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Res        ISSN: 0013-9351            Impact factor:   6.498


  52 in total

1.  An intact HDM2 RING-finger domain is required for nuclear exclusion of p53.

Authors:  S D Boyd; K Y Tsai; T Jacks
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 28.824

Review 2.  Oxidative mechanisms of biological activity of low-intensity radiofrequency radiation.

Authors:  Igor Yakymenko; Olexandr Tsybulin; Evgeniy Sidorik; Diane Henshel; Olga Kyrylenko; Sergiy Kyrylenko
Journal:  Electromagn Biol Med       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 2.882

3.  Pooled analysis of case-control studies on malignant brain tumours and the use of mobile and cordless phones including living and deceased subjects.

Authors:  Lennart Hardell; Michael Carlberg; Kjell Hansson Mild
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  2011-02-17       Impact factor: 5.650

4.  DACT2 is a candidate tumor suppressor and prognostic marker in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Jian Hou; Lian-Di Liao; Yang-Min Xie; Fa-Min Zeng; Xia Ji; Bo Chen; Li-Yan Li; Meng-Xiao Zhu; Cui-Xia Yang; Tao Chen; Xiu-E Xu; Jian Shen; Ming-Zhou Guo; En-Min Li; Li-Yan Xu
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2013-06-26

Review 5.  Cancer epidemiology update, following the 2011 IARC evaluation of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (Monograph 102).

Authors:  Anthony B Miller; L Lloyd Morgan; Iris Udasin; Devra Lee Davis
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 6.498

6.  Histone deacetylase inhibitor, apicidin, inhibits human ovarian cancer cell migration via class II histone deacetylase 4 silencing.

Authors:  Mee Young Ahn; Dong O Kang; Yong Jin Na; Sungpil Yoon; Whan Soo Choi; Keun Wook Kang; Hae Young Chung; Jee H Jung; Do Sik Min; Hyung Sik Kim
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2012-07-07       Impact factor: 8.679

7.  Oncoprotein MDM2 conceals the activation domain of tumour suppressor p53.

Authors:  J D Oliner; J A Pietenpol; S Thiagalingam; J Gyuris; K W Kinzler; B Vogelstein
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1993-04-29       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  p21-Activated kinase 6 (PAK6) inhibits prostate cancer growth via phosphorylation of androgen receptor and tumorigenic E3 ligase murine double minute-2 (Mdm2).

Authors:  Tong Liu; Yang Li; Hui Gu; Ge Zhu; Jiabin Li; Liu Cao; Feng Li
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-11-06       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  Use of mobile phones and risk of brain tumours: update of Danish cohort study.

Authors:  Patrizia Frei; Aslak H Poulsen; Christoffer Johansen; Jørgen H Olsen; Marianne Steding-Jessen; Joachim Schüz
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2011-10-19

10.  Ube2v1-mediated ubiquitination and degradation of Sirt1 promotes metastasis of colorectal cancer by epigenetically suppressing autophagy.

Authors:  Tong Shen; Ling-Dong Cai; Yu-Hong Liu; Shi Li; Wen-Juan Gan; Xiu-Ming Li; Jing-Ru Wang; Peng-Da Guo; Qun Zhou; Xing-Xing Lu; Li-Na Sun; Jian-Ming Li
Journal:  J Hematol Oncol       Date:  2018-07-17       Impact factor: 17.388

View more
  4 in total

1.  Changing incidence and projections of thyroid cancer in mainland China, 1983-2032: evidence from Cancer Incidence in Five Continents.

Authors:  Mandi Li; Jiao Pei; Minghan Xu; Ting Shu; Chengjie Qin; Meijing Hu; Yawei Zhang; Min Jiang; Cairong Zhu
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 2.506

2.  Is the Increasing Incidence of Thyroid Cancer in the Nordic Countries Caused by Use of Mobile Phones?

Authors:  Michael Carlberg; Tarmo Koppel; Lena K Hedendahl; Lennart Hardell
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Scientific evidence invalidates health assumptions underlying the FCC and ICNIRP exposure limit determinations for radiofrequency radiation: implications for 5G.

Authors: 
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2022-10-18       Impact factor: 7.123

4.  Development of health-based exposure limits for radiofrequency radiation from wireless devices using a benchmark dose approach.

Authors:  Uloma Igara Uche; Olga V Naidenko
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2021-07-17       Impact factor: 5.984

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.