Literature DB >> 30196523

In silico fragment-mapping method: a new tool for fragment-based/structure-based drug discovery.

Noriyuki Yamaotsu1, Shuichi Hirono2.   

Abstract

Here, we propose an in silico fragment-mapping method as a potential tool for fragment-based/structure-based drug discovery (FBDD/SBDD). For this method, we created a database named Canonical Subsite-Fragment DataBase (CSFDB) and developed a knowledge-based fragment-mapping program, Fsubsite. CSFDB consists of various pairs of subsite-fragments derived from X-ray crystal structures of known protein-ligand complexes. Using three-dimensional similarity-matching between subsites on one protein and another, Fsubsite compares the surface of a target protein with all subsites in CSFDB. When a local topography similar to the subsite is found on the surface, Fsubsite places a fragment combined with the subsite in CSFDB on the target protein. For validation purposes, we applied the method to the apo-structure of cyclin-dependent kinase 2 (CDK2) and identified four compounds containing three mapped fragments that existed in the list of known inhibitors of CDK2. Next, the utility of our fragment-mapping method for fragment-growing was examined on the complex structure of tRNA-guanine transglycosylase with a small ligand. Fsubsite mapped appropriate fragments on the same position as the binding ligand or in the vicinity of the ligand. Finally, a 3D-pharmacophore model was constructed from the fragments mapped on the apo-structure of heat shock protein 90-α (HSP90α). Then, 3D pharmacophore-based virtual screening was carried out using a commercially available compound database. The resultant hit compounds were very similar to a known ligand of HSP90α. As a result of these findings, this in silico fragment-mapping method seems to be a useful tool for computational FBDD and SBDD.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fragment growing; Fragment mapping; Fragment-based drug discovery; Virtual screening

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30196523     DOI: 10.1007/s10822-018-0160-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des        ISSN: 0920-654X            Impact factor:   3.686


  45 in total

1.  Estimation of active conformations of drugs by a new molecular superposing procedure.

Authors:  K Iwase; S Hirono
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  A 'rule of three' for fragment-based lead discovery?

Authors:  Miles Congreve; Robin Carr; Chris Murray; Harren Jhoti
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2003-10-01       Impact factor: 7.851

3.  Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 2. Enrichment factors in database screening.

Authors:  Thomas A Halgren; Robert B Murphy; Richard A Friesner; Hege S Beard; Leah L Frye; W Thomas Pollard; Jay L Banks
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2004-03-25       Impact factor: 7.446

4.  Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 1. Method and assessment of docking accuracy.

Authors:  Richard A Friesner; Jay L Banks; Robert B Murphy; Thomas A Halgren; Jasna J Klicic; Daniel T Mainz; Matthew P Repasky; Eric H Knoll; Mee Shelley; Jason K Perry; David E Shaw; Perry Francis; Peter S Shenkin
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2004-03-25       Impact factor: 7.446

5.  Structure-based optimization of potent PDK1 inhibitors.

Authors:  Mauro Angiolini; Patrizia Banfi; Elena Casale; Francesco Casuscelli; Claudio Fiorelli; Maria B Saccardo; Marco Silvagni; Fabio Zuccotto
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem Lett       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 2.823

6.  Evaluation of the searching abilities of HBOP and HBSITE for binding pocket detection.

Authors:  Akifumi Oda; Noriyuki Yamaotsu; Shuichi Hirono
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.376

7.  Comparative assessment of scoring functions on a diverse test set.

Authors:  Tiejun Cheng; Xun Li; Yan Li; Zhihai Liu; Renxiao Wang
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 4.956

Review 8.  Successful generation of structural information for fragment-based drug discovery.

Authors:  Linda Öster; Sofia Tapani; Yafeng Xue; Helena Käck
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 7.851

Review 9.  Fragment-based drug discovery and molecular docking in drug design.

Authors:  Tao Wang; Mian-Bin Wu; Zheng-Jie Chen; Hua Chen; Jian-Ping Lin; Li-Rong Yang
Journal:  Curr Pharm Biotechnol       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.837

10.  DrugBank: a comprehensive resource for in silico drug discovery and exploration.

Authors:  David S Wishart; Craig Knox; An Chi Guo; Savita Shrivastava; Murtaza Hassanali; Paul Stothard; Zhan Chang; Jennifer Woolsey
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2006-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Concepts and Core Principles of Fragment-Based Drug Design.

Authors:  Philine Kirsch; Alwin M Hartman; Anna K H Hirsch; Martin Empting
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 4.411

Review 2.  Applications of Solution NMR in Drug Discovery.

Authors:  Li Shi; Naixia Zhang
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 4.411

3.  Designing Novel Compounds for the Treatment and Management of RET-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer-Fragment Based Drug Design Strategy.

Authors:  Priyanka Ramesh; Shanthi Veerappapillai
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 4.411

Review 4.  Using Structure-guided Fragment-Based Drug Discovery to Target Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infections in Cystic Fibrosis.

Authors:  Sheikh Mohammed Arif; R Andres Floto; Tom L Blundell
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2022-03-30

5.  Room-temperature crystallography using a microfluidic protein crystal array device and its application to protein-ligand complex structure analysis.

Authors:  Masatoshi Maeki; Sho Ito; Reo Takeda; Go Ueno; Akihiko Ishida; Hirofumi Tani; Masaki Yamamoto; Manabu Tokeshi
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2020-08-25       Impact factor: 9.825

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.