Literature DB >> 30195423

A review of image analysis and machine learning techniques for automated cervical cancer screening from pap-smear images.

Wasswa William1, Andrew Ware2, Annabella Habinka Basaza-Ejiri3, Johnes Obungoloch4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVE: Early diagnosis and classification of a cancer type can help facilitate the subsequent clinical management of the patient. Cervical cancer ranks as the fourth most prevalent cancer affecting women worldwide and its early detection provides the opportunity to help save life. To that end, automated diagnosis and classification of cervical cancer from pap-smear images has become a necessity as it enables accurate, reliable and timely analysis of the condition's progress. This paper presents an overview of the state of the art as articulated in prominent recent publications focusing on automated detection of cervical cancer from pap-smear images.
METHODS: The survey reviews publications on applications of image analysis and machine learning in automated diagnosis and classification of cervical cancer from pap-smear images spanning 15 years. The survey reviews 30 journal papers obtained electronically through four scientific databases (Google Scholar, Scopus, IEEE and Science Direct) searched using three sets of keywords: (1) segmentation, classification, cervical cancer; (2) medical imaging, machine learning, pap-smear; (3) automated system, classification, pap-smear.
RESULTS: Most of the existing algorithms facilitate an accuracy of nearly 93.78% on an open pap-smear data set, segmented using CHAMP digital image software. K-nearest-neighbors and support vector machines algorithms have been reported to be excellent classifiers for cervical images with accuracies of over 99.27% and 98.5% respectively when applied to a 2-class classification problem (normal or abnormal).
CONCLUSION: The reviewed papers indicate that there are still weaknesses in the available techniques that result in low accuracy of classification in some classes of cells. Moreover, most of the existing algorithms work either on single or on multiple cervical smear images. This accuracy can be increased by varying various parameters such as the features to be extracted, improvement in noise removal, using hybrid segmentation and classification techniques such of multi-level classifiers. Combining K-nearest-neighbors algorithm with other algorithm(s) such as support vector machines, pixel level classifications and including statistical shape models can also improve performance. Further, most of the developed classifiers are tested on accurately segmented images using commercially available software such as CHAMP software. There is thus a deficit of evidence that these algorithms will work in clinical settings found in developing countries (where 85% of cervical cancer incidences occur) that lack sufficient trained cytologists and the funds to buy the commercial segmentation software.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical cancer; Classification; Machine learning; Medical imaging; Pap-smear; Pap-smear images; Segmentation

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30195423     DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2018.05.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed        ISSN: 0169-2607            Impact factor:   5.428


  21 in total

1.  Comparing Deep Learning Models for Multi-cell Classification in Liquid- based Cervical Cytology Image.

Authors:  Sudhir Sornapudi; Gregory T Brown; Zhiyun Xue; Rodney Long; Lisa Allen; Sameer Antani
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2020-03-04

2.  A machine learning model of microscopic agglutination test for diagnosis of leptospirosis.

Authors:  Yuji Oyamada; Ryo Ozuru; Toshiyuki Masuzawa; Satoshi Miyahara; Yasuhiko Nikaido; Fumiko Obata; Mitsumasa Saito; Sharon Yvette Angelina M Villanueva; Jun Fujii
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-16       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  Review of the Standard and Advanced Screening, Staging Systems and Treatment Modalities for Cervical Cancer.

Authors:  Siaw Shi Boon; Ho Yin Luk; Chuanyun Xiao; Zigui Chen; Paul Kay Sheung Chan
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 6.575

4.  Multi-task network for automated analysis of high-resolution endomicroscopy images to detect cervical precancer and cancer.

Authors:  David Brenes; C J Barberan; Brady Hunt; Sonia G Parra; Mila P Salcedo; Júlio C Possati-Resende; Miriam L Cremer; Philip E Castle; José H T G Fregnani; Mauricio Maza; Kathleen M Schmeler; Richard Baraniuk; Rebecca Richards-Kortum
Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph       Date:  2022-02-26       Impact factor: 7.422

5.  Diagnosis of Cervical Cancer based on Ensemble Deep Learning Network using Colposcopy Images.

Authors:  Venkatesan Chandran; M G Sumithra; Alagar Karthick; Tony George; M Deivakani; Balan Elakkiya; Umashankar Subramaniam; S Manoharan
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Point-of-Care Digital Cytology With Artificial Intelligence for Cervical Cancer Screening in a Resource-Limited Setting.

Authors:  Oscar Holmström; Nina Linder; Harrison Kaingu; Ngali Mbuuko; Jumaa Mbete; Felix Kinyua; Sara Törnquist; Martin Muinde; Leena Krogerus; Mikael Lundin; Vinod Diwan; Johan Lundin
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-03-01

7.  Cric searchable image database as a public platform for conventional pap smear cytology data.

Authors:  Mariana T Rezende; Raniere Silva; Fagner de O Bernardo; Alessandra H G Tobias; Paulo H C Oliveira; Tales M Machado; Caio S Costa; Fatima N S Medeiros; Daniela M Ushizima; Claudia M Carneiro; Andrea G C Bianchi
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 6.444

8.  A fuzzy rank-based ensemble of CNN models for classification of cervical cytology.

Authors:  Ankur Manna; Rohit Kundu; Dmitrii Kaplun; Aleksandr Sinitca; Ram Sarkar
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  The artificial intelligence-assisted cytology diagnostic system in large-scale cervical cancer screening: A population-based cohort study of 0.7 million women.

Authors:  Heling Bao; Xiaorong Sun; Yi Zhang; Baochuan Pang; Hua Li; Liang Zhou; Fengpin Wu; Dehua Cao; Jian Wang; Bojana Turic; Linhong Wang
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 4.452

Review 10.  Precision Medicine, AI, and the Future of Personalized Health Care.

Authors:  Kevin B Johnson; Wei-Qi Wei; Dilhan Weeraratne; Mark E Frisse; Karl Misulis; Kyu Rhee; Juan Zhao; Jane L Snowdon
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 4.689

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.