Marootpong Pooam1, Louis-David Arthaut1, Derek Burdick1,2, Justin Link2, Carlos F Martino3, Margaret Ahmad4,5. 1. Sorbonne Universités, CNRS, UMR8256, IBPS, Photobiology Research Group, 7 Quai St. Bernard, 75005, Paris, France. 2. Xavier University, 3800 Victory Parkway, Cincinnati, OH, 45207, USA. 3. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Florida Institute of Technology, 150W University Blvd, Melbourne, FL, 32901, USA. 4. Sorbonne Universités, CNRS, UMR8256, IBPS, Photobiology Research Group, 7 Quai St. Bernard, 75005, Paris, France. margaret.ahmad@upmc.fr. 5. Xavier University, 3800 Victory Parkway, Cincinnati, OH, 45207, USA. margaret.ahmad@upmc.fr.
Abstract
MAIN CONCLUSION: Arabidopsis cryptochrome mediates responses to magnetic fields that have been applied in the absence of light, consistent with flavin reoxidation as the primary detection mechanism. Cryptochromes are highly conserved blue-light-absorbing flavoproteins which have been linked to the perception of electromagnetic stimuli in numerous organisms. These include sensing the direction of the earth's magnetic field in migratory birds and the intensity of magnetic fields in insects and plants. When exposed to light, cryptochromes undergo flavin reduction/reoxidation redox cycles leading to biological activation which generate radical pairs thought to be the basis for magnetic sensitivity. However, the nature of the magnetically sensitive radical pairs and the steps at which they act during the cryptochrome redox cycle are currently a matter of debate. Here, we investigate the response of Arabidopsis cryptochrome-1 in vivo to a static magnetic field of 500 μT (10 × earth's field) using both plant growth and light-dependent phosphorylation as an assay. Cryptochrome responses to light were enhanced by the magnetic field, as indicated by increased inhibition of hypocotyl elongation and increased cryptochrome phosphorylation. However, when light and dark intervals were given intermittently, a plant response to the magnetic field was observed even when the magnetic field was given exclusively during the dark intervals between light exposures. This indicates that the magnetically sensitive reaction step in the cryptochrome photocycle must occur during flavin reoxidation, and likely involves the formation of reactive oxygen species.
MAIN CONCLUSION: Arabidopsis cryptochrome mediates responses to magnetic fields that have been applied in the absence of light, consistent with flavin reoxidation as the primary detection mechanism. Cryptochromes are highly conserved blue-light-absorbing flavoproteins which have been linked to the perception of electromagnetic stimuli in numerous organisms. These include sensing the direction of the earth's magnetic field in migratory birds and the intensity of magnetic fields in insects and plants. When exposed to light, cryptochromes undergo flavin reduction/reoxidation redox cycles leading to biological activation which generate radical pairs thought to be the basis for magnetic sensitivity. However, the nature of the magnetically sensitive radical pairs and the steps at which they act during the cryptochrome redox cycle are currently a matter of debate. Here, we investigate the response of Arabidopsis cryptochrome-1 in vivo to a static magnetic field of 500 μT (10 × earth's field) using both plant growth and light-dependent phosphorylation as an assay. Cryptochrome responses to light were enhanced by the magnetic field, as indicated by increased inhibition of hypocotyl elongation and increased cryptochrome phosphorylation. However, when light and dark intervals were given intermittently, a plant response to the magnetic field was observed even when the magnetic field was given exclusively during the dark intervals between light exposures. This indicates that the magnetically sensitive reaction step in the cryptochrome photocycle must occur during flavin reoxidation, and likely involves the formation of reactive oxygen species.
Authors: Margaret Ahmad; Nicholas Grancher; Mary Heil; Robert C Black; Baldissera Giovani; Paul Galland; Danielle Lardemer Journal: Plant Physiol Date: 2002-06 Impact factor: 8.340
Authors: Roopa Banerjee; Erik Schleicher; Stefan Meier; Rafael Muñoz Viana; Richard Pokorny; Margaret Ahmad; Robert Bittl; Alfred Batschauer Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2007-03-13 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Jean-Pierre Bouly; Erik Schleicher; Maribel Dionisio-Sese; Filip Vandenbussche; Dominique Van Der Straeten; Nadia Bakrim; Stefan Meier; Alfred Batschauer; Paul Galland; Robert Bittl; Margaret Ahmad Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2007-01-19 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Sue-Re Harris; Kevin B Henbest; Kiminori Maeda; John R Pannell; Christiane R Timmel; P J Hore; Haruko Okamoto Journal: J R Soc Interface Date: 2009-02-25 Impact factor: 4.118
Authors: Li Wen; Wei Li; Stephen Parris; Matthew West; John Lawson; Michael Smathers; Zhigang Li; Don Jones; Shuangxia Jin; Christopher A Saski Journal: BMC Dev Biol Date: 2020-12-02 Impact factor: 1.978
Authors: Jingjing Xu; Lauren E Jarocha; Tilo Zollitsch; Marcin Konowalczyk; Kevin B Henbest; Sabine Richert; Matthew J Golesworthy; Jessica Schmidt; Victoire Déjean; Daniel J C Sowood; Marco Bassetto; Jiate Luo; Jessica R Walton; Jessica Fleming; Yujing Wei; Tommy L Pitcher; Gabriel Moise; Maike Herrmann; Hang Yin; Haijia Wu; Rabea Bartölke; Stefanie J Käsehagen; Simon Horst; Glen Dautaj; Patrick D F Murton; Angela S Gehrckens; Yogarany Chelliah; Joseph S Takahashi; Karl-Wilhelm Koch; Stefan Weber; Ilia A Solov'yov; Can Xie; Stuart R Mackenzie; Christiane R Timmel; Henrik Mouritsen; P J Hore Journal: Nature Date: 2021-06-23 Impact factor: 49.962