Literature DB >> 30194017

The effect of transcranial magnetic stimulation test intensity on the amplitude, variability and reliability of motor evoked potentials.

Michael Pellegrini1, Maryam Zoghi2, Shapour Jaberzadeh3.   

Abstract

High degrees of variability reported in Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) assessment of corticospinal excitability (CSE) highlight the need to investigate its reliability as an assessment tool. This study investigated the effect of TMS test intensity on the amplitude, variability and test-retest reliability of motor evoked potentials (MEP). Twenty-five MEPs were recorded at 105%, 120%, 135%, 150% and 165% of resting motor threshold across three sessions in twelve participants. Repeated measures analysis of variance (RM-ANOVA), recruitment curve gradients and standardised z-value SDs were utilized to investigate the effect of TMS test intensity on MEP amplitude and variability. Test-retest reliability of MEP amplitude was assessed using RM-ANOVA and intraclass correlations (ICC). RM-ANOVA reported MEP amplitude significantly increased between 105-120% and 120-135% with non-significant increases thereafter. Recruitment curve gradients reduced as TMS test intensity increased. Standardised z-value SDs reported MEP amplitude variability reduced as TMS test intensity increased with the only significant reduction occurring between 120% and 135%. RM-ANOVA reported no significant effect of time on MEP amplitude, indicating agreement between sessions. ICCs indicated significant intra- and inter-session reliability for all TMS test intensities except for 105%. The only significant reduction in variability and final significant increase in MEP amplitude occurred between the same TMS test intensities. Reduced variability and increased reliability at higher TMS test intensities validate the use of higher TMS test intensities to assess changes in CSE in future research. To increase accuracy in capturing true changes in CSE we recommend assessing changes in CSE across a range of TMS test intensities.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cortical plasticity; Corticospinal excitability; Direct waves; Indirect waves; Intraclass correlation; Recruitment curve

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30194017     DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2018.09.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  11 in total

Review 1.  Application of electrophysiological measures in spinal cord injury clinical trials: a narrative review.

Authors:  Michèle Hubli; John L K Kramer; Catherine R Jutzeler; Jan Rosner; Julio C Furlan; Keith E Tansey; Martin Schubert
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2019-07-23       Impact factor: 2.772

2.  Automatic selection and feature extraction of motor-evoked potentials by transcranial magnetic stimulation in stroke patients.

Authors:  Jose E Tecuapetla-Trejo; Jessica Cantillo-Negrete; Paul Carrillo-Mora; Raquel Valdés-Cristerna; Emmanuel Ortega-Robles; Oscar Arias-Carrion; Ruben I Carino-Escobar
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2021-01-26       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Machine learning and clinical neurophysiology.

Authors:  Julian Ray; Lokesh Wijesekera; Silvia Cirstea
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2022-07-30       Impact factor: 6.682

4.  NeuroMeasure: A Software Package for Quantification of Cortical Motor Maps Using Frameless Stereotaxic Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.

Authors:  Michael B Gerber; Alasdair C McLean; Samuel J Stephen; Alex G Chalco; Usman M Arshad; Gary W Thickbroom; Josh Silverstein; K Zoe Tsagaris; Amy Kuceyeski; Kathleen Friel; Taiza E G Santos; Dylan J Edwards
Journal:  Front Neuroinform       Date:  2019-04-16       Impact factor: 4.081

Review 5.  Precise Modulation Strategies for Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: Advances and Future Directions.

Authors:  Gangliang Zhong; Zhengyi Yang; Tianzi Jiang
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2021-10-05       Impact factor: 5.203

6.  Forearm and Hand Muscles Exhibit High Coactivation and Overlapping of Cortical Motor Representations.

Authors:  Gabriela P Tardelli; Victor H Souza; Renan H Matsuda; Marco A C Garcia; Pavel A Novikov; Maria A Nazarova; Oswaldo Baffa
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 4.275

7.  Increased Excitability Induced in the Primary Motor Cortex by Transcranial Ultrasound Stimulation.

Authors:  Benjamin C Gibson; Joseph L Sanguinetti; Bashar W Badran; Alfred B Yu; Evan P Klein; Christopher C Abbott; Jeffrey T Hansberger; Vincent P Clark
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 4.003

8.  What is the effect of bodily illusions on corticomotoneuronal excitability? A systematic review.

Authors:  Alex Dilena; Gabrielle Todd; Carolyn Berryman; Ebonie Rio; Tasha R Stanton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-15       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Towards more reliable TMS studies - How fast can we probe cortical excitability?

Authors:  Maria Nazarova; Anastasia Asmolova
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol Pract       Date:  2021-12-17

Review 10.  Spontaneous Fluctuations in Oscillatory Brain State Cause Differences in Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Effects Within and Between Individuals.

Authors:  Shanice E W Janssens; Alexander T Sack
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.