Literature DB >> 30193976

Patellofemoral joint replacement - Mean five year follow-up.

Serajdin Ajnin1, Donald Buchanan2, James Arbuthnot2, Richard Fernandes2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Femoro Patella Vialli FPV is a second-generation patellofemoral arthroplasty implant. It is the second most commonly used patellofemoral implant in the National Joint Registry of England and Wales. This is the first published mid-term outcome series for this prosthesis.
METHODS: We reviewed the outcomes for all patients who had patellofemoral arthroplasty. Primary outcome was the intention to revise the implant; secondary outcome measures were Oxford and Kujala outcome scores.
RESULTS: A total of 43 FPV patellofemoral joint prostheses were implanted in 32 patients at our institution between April 2004 and December 2012. Mean follow-up was 65 (30-119) months. Only one patient was lost to follow-up. At final follow-up the mean flexion was 110° (85°-130°). Five of 43 knees required revision to a total knee replacement because of progressive tibiofemoral osteoarthritis. Revisionswere carried out after amean of 56 months (30-109). There was no radiographic loosening in any case. The most recent functional assessment showed that the mean Oxford Knee score (OKS) has improved from 18 (five to 35) preoperatively to 29 (nine to 45) and the Kujala score from 35 (five to 74) preoperatively to 58 (18-91).
CONCLUSIONS: Midterm results with FPV prosthesis demonstrate that moderate outcomes can be achieved. Patellofemoral arthroplasty may be used to delay total knee replacement but judicious patient selection to identify truly isolated patellofemoral osteoarthritis is necessary. Chondral lesion in weight bearing area can lead to early implant failure. The main cause of failure was progressive tibiofemoral osteoarthritis. Crown
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arthroplasty; FPV; Outcomes; Patellofemoral; Unicompartment

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30193976     DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2018.08.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee        ISSN: 0968-0160            Impact factor:   2.199


  5 in total

1.  CORR Insights®: What Is the Risk of Repeat Revision When Patellofemoral Replacement Is Revised to TKA? An Analysis of 482 Cases From a Large National Arthroplasty Registry.

Authors:  Brian R Hallstrom
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  The Present Situation of Patellofemoral Arthroplasty in the Management of Solitary Patellofemoral Osteoarthritis.

Authors:  E Carlos Rodriguez-Merchan
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2020-05

3.  Short-term Revision Risk of Patellofemoral Arthroplasty Is High: An Analysis from Eight Large Arthroplasty Registries.

Authors:  Peter L Lewis; Francois Tudor; Michelle Lorimer; John McKie; Eric Bohm; Otto Robertsson; Keijo T Makela; Jaason Haapakoski; Ove Furnes; Christoffer Bartz-Johannessen; Rob G H H Nelissen; Liza N Van Steenbergen; Donald C Fithian; Heather A Prentice
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 4.755

4.  Patella-Femoral Joint Revision Surgery Following a Rare and Interesting Case of Implant Failure: A Case Report and Retrospective Analysis of Our Hospitals Implant Data.

Authors:  Joshua K Nadimi; Daniel Winson; William Roy; Daniel W Lewis; David Pemberton
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-03-07

Review 5.  The short-term effectiveness and safety of second-generation patellofemoral arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty on isolated patellofemoral osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Chengxin Li; Zhizhuo Li; Lijun Shi; Fuqiang Gao; Wei Sun
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 2.359

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.