Chengxin Li1, Zhizhuo Li1, Lijun Shi2, Fuqiang Gao3, Wei Sun4. 1. Department of Orthopedics, Peking University China-Japan Friendship School of Clinical Medicine, 2 Yinghuadong Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100029, China. 2. Department of Orthopedics, Graduate School of Peking Union Medical College, China-Japan Friendship Institute of Clinical Medicine, 2 Yinghuadong Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100029, China. 3. Beijing Key Laboratory of Immune Inflammatory Disease, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, 2 Yinghuadong Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100029, China. 4. Beijing Key Laboratory of Immune Inflammatory Disease, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, 2 Yinghuadong Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100029, China. cjfhsunw@163.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We aimed to compare second-generation patellofemoral arthroplasty (2G PFA) with total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in treating isolated patellofemoral osteoarthritis (PFOA) by assessing the percentages of revisions, complications, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). METHODS: Studies that compared the outcomes of 2G PFA and TKA in the treatment of isolated PFOA were searched in electronic databases, including MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science. Two researchers independently identified eligible studies, extracted the data, and evaluated the quality of the literature. Pooled risk ratios (RRs) or weighted mean differences with 95% confidence intervals were calculated using either fixed or random effects models. Descriptive analysis was used when data could not be pooled. RESULTS: A total of six studies were included in the review. For the revision percentage and complications, there were no significant differences between 2G PFA and TKA (RR = 2.29, 95% CI 0.69-7.58, P = 0.17; RR = 0.56, 95% CI 0.23-1.40, P = 0.22, respectively). Second, the results demonstrated that the differences in the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) activity score between 2G PFA and TKA were not significant (WMD -4.68, 95% CI -16.32 to 6.97, p = 0.43; WMD 0.16, 95% CI -1.21 to 1.53, P = 0.82). The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), the American Knee Society Score (AKSS), and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) were presented in a narrative form due to methodological heterogeneity. CONCLUSION: For isolated PFOA, 2G PFA demonstrated similar results to TKA with respect to the percentages of revisions, complications, and PROMs.
BACKGROUND: We aimed to compare second-generation patellofemoral arthroplasty (2G PFA) with total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in treating isolated patellofemoral osteoarthritis (PFOA) by assessing the percentages of revisions, complications, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). METHODS: Studies that compared the outcomes of 2G PFA and TKA in the treatment of isolated PFOA were searched in electronic databases, including MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science. Two researchers independently identified eligible studies, extracted the data, and evaluated the quality of the literature. Pooled risk ratios (RRs) or weighted mean differences with 95% confidence intervals were calculated using either fixed or random effects models. Descriptive analysis was used when data could not be pooled. RESULTS: A total of six studies were included in the review. For the revision percentage and complications, there were no significant differences between 2G PFA and TKA (RR = 2.29, 95% CI 0.69-7.58, P = 0.17; RR = 0.56, 95% CI 0.23-1.40, P = 0.22, respectively). Second, the results demonstrated that the differences in the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) activity score between 2G PFA and TKA were not significant (WMD -4.68, 95% CI -16.32 to 6.97, p = 0.43; WMD 0.16, 95% CI -1.21 to 1.53, P = 0.82). The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), the American Knee Society Score (AKSS), and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) were presented in a narrative form due to methodological heterogeneity. CONCLUSION: For isolated PFOA, 2G PFA demonstrated similar results to TKA with respect to the percentages of revisions, complications, and PROMs.
Entities:
Keywords:
Isolated patellofemoral osteoarthritis; Second-generation patellofemoral arthroplasty; Total knee arthroplasty
Authors: Anders Odgaard; Frank Madsen; Per Wagner Kristensen; Andreas Kappel; Jesper Fabrin Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2018-01 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Fabio Luigi Perrone; Steffen Baron; Eduardo M Suero; Christian Lausmann; Daniel Kendoff; Akos Zahar; Thorsten Gehrke; Mustafa Citak Journal: Technol Health Care Date: 2018 Impact factor: 1.285