Enrico M Minnella1, Rashami Awasthi1, Sarah-Eve Loiselle1, Ramanakumar V Agnihotram2, Lorenzo E Ferri3, Francesco Carli1. 1. Department of Anesthesia, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. 2. Research Institute, McGill University Health Centre, Glen Site, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. 3. Division of Thoracic Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Abstract
Importance: Preserving functional capacity is a key element in the care continuum for patients with esophagogastric cancer. Prehabilitation, a preoperative conditioning intervention aiming to optimize physical status, has not been tested in upper gastrointestinal surgery to date. Objective: To investigate whether prehabilitation is effective in improving functional status in patients undergoing esophagogastric cancer resection. Design, Setting, and Participants: A randomized clinical trial (available-case analysis based on completed assessments) was conducted at McGill University Health Centre (Montreal, Quebec, Canada) comparing prehabilitation with a control group. Intervention consisted of preoperative exercise and nutrition optimization. Participants were adults awaiting elective esophagogastric resection for cancer. The study dates were February 13, 2013, to February 10, 2017. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was change in functional capacity, measured with absolute change in 6-minute walk distance (6MWD). Preoperative (end of the prehabilitation period) and postoperative (from 4 to 8 weeks after surgery) data were compared between groups. Results:Sixty-eight patients were randomized, and 51 were included in the primary analysis. The control group were a mean (SD) age, 68.0 (11.6) years and 20 (80%) men. Patients in the prehabilitation group were a mean (SD) age, 67.3 (7.4) years and 18 (69%) men. Compared with the control group, the prehabilitation group had improved functional capacity both before surgery (mean [SD] 6MWD change, 36.9 [51.4] vs -22.8 [52.5] m; P < .001) and after surgery (mean [SD] 6MWD change, 15.4 [65.6] vs -81.8 [87.0] m; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: Prehabilitation improves perioperative functional capacity in esophagogastric surgery. Keeping patients from physical and nutritional status decline could have a significant effect on the cancer care continuum. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01666158.
RCT Entities:
Importance: Preserving functional capacity is a key element in the care continuum for patients with esophagogastric cancer. Prehabilitation, a preoperative conditioning intervention aiming to optimize physical status, has not been tested in upper gastrointestinal surgery to date. Objective: To investigate whether prehabilitation is effective in improving functional status in patients undergoing esophagogastric cancer resection. Design, Setting, and Participants: A randomized clinical trial (available-case analysis based on completed assessments) was conducted at McGill University Health Centre (Montreal, Quebec, Canada) comparing prehabilitation with a control group. Intervention consisted of preoperative exercise and nutrition optimization. Participants were adults awaiting elective esophagogastric resection for cancer. The study dates were February 13, 2013, to February 10, 2017. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was change in functional capacity, measured with absolute change in 6-minute walk distance (6MWD). Preoperative (end of the prehabilitation period) and postoperative (from 4 to 8 weeks after surgery) data were compared between groups. Results: Sixty-eight patients were randomized, and 51 were included in the primary analysis. The control group were a mean (SD) age, 68.0 (11.6) years and 20 (80%) men. Patients in the prehabilitation group were a mean (SD) age, 67.3 (7.4) years and 18 (69%) men. Compared with the control group, the prehabilitation group had improved functional capacity both before surgery (mean [SD] 6MWD change, 36.9 [51.4] vs -22.8 [52.5] m; P < .001) and after surgery (mean [SD] 6MWD change, 15.4 [65.6] vs -81.8 [87.0] m; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: Prehabilitation improves perioperative functional capacity in esophagogastric surgery. Keeping patients from physical and nutritional status decline could have a significant effect on the cancer care continuum. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01666158.
Authors: Jane T Hickok; Joseph A Roscoe; Gary R Morrow; Karen Mustian; Paul Okunieff; Christopher W Bole Journal: Cancer Date: 2005-10-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Brian P Chen; Rashami Awasthi; Shane N Sweet; Enrico M Minnella; Andreas Bergdahl; Daniel Santa Mina; Francesco Carli; Celena Scheede-Bergdahl Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2016-08-18 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: D F J Dunne; S Jack; R P Jones; L Jones; D T Lythgoe; H Z Malik; G J Poston; D H Palmer; S W Fenwick Journal: Br J Surg Date: 2016-02-11 Impact factor: 6.939
Authors: Emer M Guinan; Suzanne L Doyle; Linda O'Neill; Margaret R Dunne; Emma K Foley; Jacintha O'Sullivan; John V Reynolds; Juliette Hussey Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2016-11-03 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Naomi M Sell; Julie K Silver; Stephanie Rando; Ashley C Draviam; Daniel Santa Mina; Motaz Qadan Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2020-05-01 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Niharika A Duggal; Grace Niemiro; Stephen D R Harridge; Richard J Simpson; Janet M Lord Journal: Nat Rev Immunol Date: 2019-09 Impact factor: 53.106
Authors: William A Wood; M Weaver; A E Smith-Ryan; E D Hanson; T C Shea; C L Battaglini Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2020-02-28 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Kelly J Lafaro; Dan J Raz; Jae Y Kim; Sherry Hite; Nora Ruel; Gouri Varatkar; Loretta Erhunmwunsee; Laleh Melstrom; Byrne Lee; Gagandeep Singh; Yuman Fong; Virginia Sun Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2019-12-16 Impact factor: 3.603