Literature DB >> 30193253

Effect of Mobile Device-Supported Single-Patient Multi-crossover Trials on Treatment of Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Richard L Kravitz1,2, Christopher H Schmid3, Maria Marois2, Barth Wilsey4,5, Deborah Ward6, Ron D Hays7, Naihua Duan8, Youdan Wang3, Scott MacDonald9, Anthony Jerant10, Joseph L Servadio3,11, David Haddad12, Ida Sim12,13.   

Abstract

Importance: Individually designed single-patient multi-crossover (n-of-1) trials can facilitate tailoring of treatments directed at various conditions, including chronic musculoskeletal pain (CMSP) but are potentially burdensome, which may limit uptake in research and practice.
Objectives: To determine whether patients randomized to participate in an n-of-1 trial supported by a mobile health (mHealth) app would experience less pain and improved global health, adherence, satisfaction, and shared decision making compared with patients assigned to usual care. Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized clinical trial compared participation in an individualized, mHealth-supported n-of-1 trial vs usual care. The participating 215 patients had CMSP for at least 6 weeks, had a smartphone or tablet with a data plan, were enrolled in northern California from July 2014 through July 2016, and were followed for up to 1 year by 48 clinicians in academic, community, Veterans Affairs, and military settings. Interventions: Intervention patients met with their clinicians and used a desktop interface to select treatments and trial parameters for an n-of-1 trial comparing 2 pain-management regimens. The mHealth app provided reminders to take designated treatments on assigned days and to upload responses to daily questions on pain and treatment-associated adverse effects. Control patients received care as usual. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was change in the PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) pain-related interference 8-item short-form scale (full scale range, 41-78) from baseline to 6 months. Secondary outcomes included patient-reported pain intensity, overall health, analgesic adherence, trust in clinician, satisfaction with care, medication-related shared decision making, and, for the n-of-1 group only, participant engagement and experience.
Results: Among 215 patients (108 randomized to the n-of-1 intervention and 107 to control), 102 (47%) were women, and the mean (SD) age was 55.5 (11.1) years. At the 6-month follow-up, pain interference was reduced in both groups, though there was no difference between the intervention and control groups (-1.36 points; 95% CI, -2.91 to 0.19 points; P = .09). There were no advantages in secondary outcomes for intervention patients vs control patients except for higher medication-related shared decision making at 6 months (between-group difference, 11.9 points; 95% CI, 2.6-21.2 points; P = .01). Among patients assigned to the n-of-1 group, 88% (n = 86) affirmed that the mHealth app could help people like them manage their pain. Conclusions and Relevance: In this population of patients with CMSP, mHealth-supported n-of-1 trials were feasible and associated with a satisfactory user experience, but n-of-1 trial participation did not significantly improve pain interference at 6 months vs usual care. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02116621.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30193253      PMCID: PMC6233756          DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.3981

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Intern Med        ISSN: 2168-6106            Impact factor:   21.873


  37 in total

1.  Evidence-based medicine, heterogeneity of treatment effects, and the trouble with averages.

Authors:  Richard L Kravitz; Naihua Duan; Joel Braslow
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.911

Review 2.  The Primary Outcome Fails - What Next?

Authors:  Stuart J Pocock; Gregg W Stone
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Further validation and reliability testing of the Trust in Physician Scale. The Stanford Trust Study Physicians.

Authors:  D H Thom; K M Ribisl; A L Stewart; D A Luke
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Concerns about medication and medication adherence in patients with chronic pain recruited from general practice.

Authors:  Benjamin A Rosser; Lance M McCracken; Sophie C Velleman; Charlotte Boichat; Christopher Eccleston
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2011-03-03       Impact factor: 6.961

5.  Evaluating the psychometric properties of the CAHPS Patient-centered Medical Home survey.

Authors:  Ron D Hays; Laura J Berman; Michael H Kanter; Mildred Hugh; Rachel R Oglesby; Chong Y Kim; Mike Cui; Julie Brown
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 3.393

6.  Prescription of Long-Acting Opioids and Mortality in Patients With Chronic Noncancer Pain.

Authors:  Wayne A Ray; Cecilia P Chung; Katherine T Murray; Kathi Hall; C Michael Stein
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Single-patient drug trial methodology for allergic rhinitis.

Authors:  Donald P Reitberg; Eve Del Rio; Sidney L Weiss; Gerbert Rebell; Nardo Zaias
Journal:  Ann Pharmacother       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.154

Review 8.  The Impact of Patient Participation in Health Decisions Within Medical Encounters: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Marla L Clayman; Carma L Bylund; Betty Chewning; Gregory Makoul
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 2.583

9.  Depression in patients with chronic pain attending a specialised pain treatment centre: prevalence and impact on health care costs.

Authors:  Lauren Rayner; Matthew Hotopf; Hristina Petkova; Faith Matcham; Anna Simpson; Lance M McCracken
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 6.961

10.  Development and initial validation of the PEG, a three-item scale assessing pain intensity and interference.

Authors:  Erin E Krebs; Karl A Lorenz; Matthew J Bair; Teresa M Damush; Jingwei Wu; Jason M Sutherland; Steven M Asch; Kurt Kroenke
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2009-05-06       Impact factor: 5.128

View more
  16 in total

1.  Effect of Mobile Device-Assisted N-of-1 Trial Participation on Analgesic Prescribing for Chronic Pain: Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  David D Odineal; Maria T Marois; Deborah Ward; Christopher H Schmid; Rima Cabrera; Ida Sim; Youdan Wang; Barth Wilsey; Naihua Duan; Stephen G Henry; Richard L Kravitz
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  N-of-1 Trials in Hypertension Are Feasible, but Are They Worthwhile?

Authors:  Richard L Kravitz
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 3.  N-of-1 trials to facilitate evidence-based deprescribing: Rationale and case study.

Authors:  Parag Goyal; Monika M Safford; Sarah N Hilmer; Michael A Steinman; Daniel D Matlock; Mathew S Maurer; Mark S Lachs; Ian M Kronish
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 3.716

4.  StudyU: A Platform for Designing and Conducting Innovative Digital N-of-1 Trials.

Authors:  Stefan Konigorski; Sarah Wernicke; Tamara Slosarek; Alexander M Zenner; Nils Strelow; Darius F Ruether; Florian Henschel; Manisha Manaswini; Fabian Pottbäcker; Jonathan A Edelman; Babajide Owoyele; Matteo Danieletto; Eddye Golden; Micol Zweig; Girish N Nadkarni; Erwin Böttinger
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 7.076

5.  Exploring the Potential for Collaborative Use of an App-Based Platform for n-of-1 Trials Among Healthcare Professionals That Treat Patients With Insomnia.

Authors:  Jason R Bobe; Jessica K De Freitas; Benjamin S Glicksberg
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2020-09-04       Impact factor: 4.157

Review 6.  Smartphone Applications Designed to Improve Older People's Chronic Pain Management: An Integrated Systematic Review.

Authors:  Margaret Dunham; Antonio Bonacaro; Patricia Schofield; Liz Bacon; Fotios Spyridonis; Hadi Mehrpouya
Journal:  Geriatrics (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-08

7.  Why we need a small data paradigm.

Authors:  Eric B Hekler; Predrag Klasnja; Guillaume Chevance; Natalie M Golaszewski; Dana Lewis; Ida Sim
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 8.775

Review 8.  Mobile Application-Based Interventions for Chronic Pain Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Effectiveness.

Authors:  Ann-Christin Pfeifer; Riaz Uddin; Paul Schröder-Pfeifer; Felix Holl; Walter Swoboda; Marcus Schiltenwolf
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 4.241

9.  Feasibility, Acceptability, and Influence of mHealth-Supported N-of-1 Trials for Enhanced Cognitive and Emotional Well-Being in US Volunteers.

Authors:  Richard L Kravitz; Adrian Aguilera; Elaine J Chen; Yong K Choi; Eric Hekler; Chris Karr; Katherine K Kim; Sayali Phatak; Sayantani Sarkar; Stephen M Schueller; Ida Sim; Jiabei Yang; Christopher H Schmid
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2020-06-25

10.  Personal preferences for Personalised Trials among patients with chronic diseases: an empirical Bayesian analysis of a conjoint survey.

Authors:  Ying Kuen Cheung; Dallas Wood; Kangkang Zhang; Ty A Ridenour; Lilly Derby; Tara St Onge; Naihua Duan; Joan Duer-Hefele; Karina W Davidson; Ian Kronish; Nathalie Moise
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-06-07       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.