Literature DB >> 30193112

Personalized Gut Mucosal Colonization Resistance to Empiric Probiotics Is Associated with Unique Host and Microbiome Features.

Niv Zmora1, Gili Zilberman-Schapira2, Jotham Suez2, Uria Mor2, Mally Dori-Bachash2, Stavros Bashiardes2, Eran Kotler3, Maya Zur2, Dana Regev-Lehavi2, Rotem Ben-Zeev Brik2, Sara Federici2, Yotam Cohen2, Raquel Linevsky2, Daphna Rothschild3, Andreas E Moor4, Shani Ben-Moshe4, Alon Harmelin5, Shalev Itzkovitz4, Nitsan Maharshak6, Oren Shibolet6, Hagit Shapiro2, Meirav Pevsner-Fischer2, Itai Sharon7, Zamir Halpern8, Eran Segal9, Eran Elinav10.   

Abstract

Empiric probiotics are commonly consumed by healthy individuals as means of life quality improvement and disease prevention. However, evidence of probiotic gut mucosal colonization efficacy remains sparse and controversial. We metagenomically characterized the murine and human mucosal-associated gastrointestinal microbiome and found it to only partially correlate with stool microbiome. A sequential invasive multi-omics measurement at baseline and during consumption of an 11-strain probiotic combination or placebo demonstrated that probiotics remain viable upon gastrointestinal passage. In colonized, but not germ-free mice, probiotics encountered a marked mucosal colonization resistance. In contrast, humans featured person-, region- and strain-specific mucosal colonization patterns, hallmarked by predictive baseline host and microbiome features, but indistinguishable by probiotics presence in stool. Consequently, probiotics induced a transient, individualized impact on mucosal community structure and gut transcriptome. Collectively, empiric probiotics supplementation may be limited in universally and persistently impacting the gut mucosa, meriting development of new personalized probiotic approaches.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30193112     DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.08.041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell        ISSN: 0092-8674            Impact factor:   41.582


  303 in total

1.  Effects of Probiotic Lactobacillus acidophilus Strain INMIA 9602 Er 317/402 and Putative Probiotic Lactobacilli on DNA Damages in the Small Intestine of Wistar Rats In Vivo.

Authors:  Astghik Z Pepoyan; Marine H Balayan; Lilit Malkhasyan; Anahit Manvelyan; Tatevik Bezhanyan; Ruzanna Paronikyan; Vardan V Tsaturyan; Stepan Tatikyan; Shigeru Kamiya; Michael L Chikindas
Journal:  Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 4.609

2.  Our Microbiome: On the Challenges, Promises, and Hype.

Authors:  Sara Federici; Jotham Suez; Eran Elinav
Journal:  Results Probl Cell Differ       Date:  2020

3.  Transcript Barcoding Illuminates the Expression Level of Synthetic Constructs in E. coli Nissle Residing in the Mammalian Gut.

Authors:  Nathan Crook; Aura Ferreiro; Zevin Condiotte; Gautam Dantas
Journal:  ACS Synth Biol       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 5.110

Review 4.  The Role of the Gut Microbiome in Predicting Response to Diet and the Development of Precision Nutrition Models-Part I: Overview of Current Methods.

Authors:  Riley L Hughes; Maria L Marco; James P Hughes; Nancy L Keim; Mary E Kable
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 8.701

Review 5.  Microbiota: a novel regulator of pain.

Authors:  Manon Defaye; Sandie Gervason; Christophe Altier; Jean-Yves Berthon; Denis Ardid; Edith Filaire; Frédéric Antonio Carvalho
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 3.575

6.  Yogurt consumption and colorectal polyps.

Authors:  Samara B Rifkin; Francis M Giardiello; Xiangzhu Zhu; Linda M Hylind; Reid M Ness; Julia L Drewes; Harvey J Murff; Emma H Spence; Walter E Smalley; Joell J Gills; Gerard E Mullin; David Kafonek; Louis La Luna; Wei Zheng; Cynthia L Sears; Martha J Shrubsole
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 3.718

Review 7.  The Role of the Gut Microbiome in Predicting Response to Diet and the Development of Precision Nutrition Models. Part II: Results.

Authors:  Riley L Hughes; Mary E Kable; Maria Marco; Nancy L Keim
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 8.701

Review 8.  Engineering the microbiome for animal health and conservation.

Authors:  Se Jin Song; Douglas C Woodhams; Cameron Martino; Celeste Allaband; Andre Mu; Sandrine Javorschi-Miller-Montgomery; Jan S Suchodolski; Rob Knight
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2019-02-18

Review 9.  Microbiome diurnal rhythmicity and its impact on host physiology and disease risk.

Authors:  Samuel Philip Nobs; Timur Tuganbaev; Eran Elinav
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2019-03-15       Impact factor: 8.807

Review 10.  Probiotics in the next-generation sequencing era.

Authors:  Jotham Suez; Niv Zmora; Eran Elinav
Journal:  Gut Microbes       Date:  2019-04-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.