Literature DB >> 30191535

Influence of frailty on anticoagulant prescription and clinical outcomes after 1-year follow-up in hospitalised older patients with atrial fibrillation.

Alejandra Gullón1, Francesc Formiga2, Jesús Díez-Manglano3, José María Mostaza4, José María Cepeda5, Antonio Pose6, Jesús Castiella7, Carmen Suárez-Fernández8.   

Abstract

Frailty is an important prognostic factor in older adults with cardiovascular diseases. We aim to describe the characteristics of elderly hospitalised frail patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and to assess the influence of frailty, along with other functional and health status variables on anticoagulation prescription, 1-year all-cause mortality, and the incidence of ischemic and bleeding complications. An observational, prospective multicentre study was carried out on patients with NVAF over the age of 75, who were admitted to the Internal Medicine departments in Spain. A total of 615 patients were evaluated (mean age 85.23 ± 5.16 years, 54.3% females, 48.3% frail). Frail patients had higher CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scores, more comorbidities and worse functional status and cognitive impairment compared to non-frail. During hospitalisation, 58 (9.4%) patients died (12.5% frail, 6.6% non-frail, p = 0.01). Among the participants discharged, 69.8% received anticoagulants, 13% anti-platelets only and 16.9% no anti-thrombotics, with no difference by frailty status. Frailty is not a predictor of anticoagulant prescription at discharge (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.55-1.57), while functional dependency remains significantly associated (OR for severe dependency 0.44, 95% CI 0.23-0.82). After the 1-year follow-up, frail patients have a higher risk of death (HR 1.99, 95% CI 1.43-2.76). Among patients taking anticoagulants, the incidence of stroke and major bleeding is similar between frailty groups. In our study, frailty is related to worse global health status. It has no impact on antithrombotic prescription, nor is a predictor of AF complications, even though frail subjects have a higher mortality during hospitalisation and after 1-year follow-up.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aged; Anticoagulants; Antithrombotic therapy; Atrial fibrillation; Elderly; Frailty

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30191535     DOI: 10.1007/s11739-018-1938-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intern Emerg Med        ISSN: 1828-0447            Impact factor:   3.397


  37 in total

1.  A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation.

Authors:  M E Charlson; P Pompei; K L Ales; C R MacKenzie
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

Review 2.  Thromboembolic prevention in frail elderly patients with atrial fibrillation: a practical algorithm.

Authors:  Serena Granziera; Alexander T Cohen; Giovanni Nante; Enzo Manzato; Giuseppe Sergi
Journal:  J Am Med Dir Assoc       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 4.669

3.  A short portable mental status questionnaire for the assessment of organic brain deficit in elderly patients.

Authors:  E Pfeiffer
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  1975-10       Impact factor: 5.562

4.  Differences in anticoagulant therapy prescription in patients with paroxysmal versus persistent atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Jonathan C Hsu; Paul S Chan; Fengming Tang; Thomas M Maddox; Gregory M Marcus
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2014-12-29       Impact factor: 4.965

5.  Frailty predicts long-term mortality in elderly subjects with chronic heart failure.

Authors:  F Cacciatore; P Abete; F Mazzella; L Viati; D Della Morte; D D'Ambrosio; G Gargiulo; G Testa; D Santis; G Galizia; N Ferrara; F Rengo
Journal:  Eur J Clin Invest       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.686

6.  The role of comprehensive geriatric assessment and functional status in evaluating the patterns of antithrombotic use among older people with atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  A Mazzone; M Bo; A Lucenti; S Galimberti; G Bellelli; G Annoni
Journal:  Arch Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 3.250

7.  Frailty consensus: a call to action.

Authors:  John E Morley; Bruno Vellas; G Abellan van Kan; Stefan D Anker; Juergen M Bauer; Roberto Bernabei; Matteo Cesari; W C Chumlea; Wolfram Doehner; Jonathan Evans; Linda P Fried; Jack M Guralnik; Paul R Katz; Theodore K Malmstrom; Roger J McCarter; Luis M Gutierrez Robledo; Ken Rockwood; Stephan von Haehling; Maurits F Vandewoude; Jeremy Walston
Journal:  J Am Med Dir Assoc       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.669

8.  Comparison of frailty indicators based on clinical phenotype and the multiple deficit approach in predicting mortality and physical limitation.

Authors:  Jean Woo; Jason Leung; John E Morley
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2012-08-02       Impact factor: 5.562

9.  Frailty is independently associated with 1-year mortality for elderly patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Niklas Ekerstad; Eva Swahn; Magnus Janzon; Joakim Alfredsson; Rurik Löfmark; Marcus Lindenberger; David Andersson; Per Carlsson
Journal:  Eur J Prev Cardiol       Date:  2013-05-03       Impact factor: 7.804

10.  Antithrombotic treatment in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation: a practical approach.

Authors:  Carmen Suárez Fernández; Suárez Fernández; Francesc Formiga; Miguel Camafort; María Cepeda Rodrigo; Jose Cepeda Rodrigo; Jesús Díez-Manglano; Antonio Pose Reino; Pose Reino; Gregorio Tiberio; Jose María Mostaza
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 2.298

View more
  8 in total

1.  Why and how do we measure frailty?

Authors:  Matteo Cesari
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 3.397

2.  Geriatric Elements and Oral Anticoagulant Prescribing in Older Atrial Fibrillation Patients: SAGE-AF.

Authors:  Jane S Saczynski; Saket R Sanghai; Catarina I Kiefe; Darleen Lessard; Francesca Marino; Molly E Waring; David Parish; Robert Helm; Felix Sogade; Robert Goldberg; Jerry Gurwitz; Weijia Wang; Tanya Mailhot; Benita Bamgbade; Bruce Barton; David D McManus
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 5.562

3.  Effectiveness and Safety of Oral Anticoagulants in Older Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Maxim Grymonprez; Stephane Steurbaut; Tine L De Backer; Mirko Petrovic; Lies Lahousse
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 5.810

4.  Geographic Variation in Anticoagulant Use and Resident, Nursing Home, and County Characteristics Associated With Treatment Among US Nursing Home Residents.

Authors:  Matthew Alcusky; Jonggyu Baek; Jennifer Tjia; David D McManus; Kate L Lapane
Journal:  J Am Med Dir Assoc       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 4.669

5.  When to withhold oral anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation - an overview of frequent clinical discussion topics.

Authors:  Jaap Seelig; Ron Pisters; Martin E Hemels; Menno V Huisman; Hugo Ten Cate; Marco Alings
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2019-09-17

6.  Anticoagulant Therapy for Frail Patients with Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Hiroshi Hori; Takahiko Fukuchi; Hitoshi Sugawara
Journal:  Intern Med       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 1.271

7.  Influence of atrial fibrillation subtypes on anticoagulant therapy in a high-risk older population: the FAI project.

Authors:  Antonio Di Carlo; Fabio Mori; Domenico Consoli; Leonardo Bellino; Augusto Zaninelli; Marzia Baldereschi; Maria Grazia D'Alfonso; Chiara Gradia; Alessandro Cattarinussi; Bruno Sgherzi; Giovanni Pracucci; Benedetta Piccardi; Bianca Maria Polizzi; Domenico Inzitari
Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 4.481

Review 8.  Atrial fibrillation: a geriatric perspective on the 2020 ESC guidelines.

Authors:  M Cristina Polidori; Mariana Alves; Gulistan Bahat; Anne Sophie Boureau; Serdar Ozkok; Roman Pfister; Alberto Pilotto; Nicola Veronese; Mario Bo
Journal:  Eur Geriatr Med       Date:  2021-11-02       Impact factor: 1.710

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.