| Literature DB >> 30190711 |
Wei Xiong1, Jonathan Lo1, Katherine J Chou1, Chao Wu1, Lauren Magnusson1, Tao Dong1, PinChing Maness1.
Abstract
Cellulolytic bacteria have the potential to perform lignocellulose hydrolysis and fermentation simultaneously. The metabolic pathways of these bacteria, therefore, require more comprehensive and quantitative understanding. Using isotope tracer, gas chromatography-mass spectrometry, and metabolic flux modeling, we decipher the metabolic network of Clostridium thermocellum, a model cellulolytic bacterium which represents as an attractive platform for conversion of lignocellulose to dedicated products. We uncover that the Embden-Meyerhof-Parnas (EMP) pathway is the predominant glycolytic route whereas the Entner-Doudoroff (ED) pathway and oxidative pentose phosphate pathway are inactive. We also observe that C. thermocellum's TCA cycle is initiated by both Si- and Re-citrate synthase, and it is disconnected between 2-oxoglutarate and oxaloacetate in the oxidative direction; C. thermocellum uses a citramalate shunt to synthesize isoleucine; and both the one-carbon pathway and the malate shunt are highly active in this bacterium. To gain a quantitative understanding, we further formulate a fluxome map to quantify the metabolic fluxes through central metabolic pathways. This work represents the first global in vivo investigation of the principal carbon metabolism of C. thermocellum. Our results elucidate the unique structure of metabolic network in this cellulolytic bacterium and demonstrate the capability of isotope-assisted metabolite studies in understanding microbial metabolism of industrial interests.Entities:
Keywords: 13C-isotope tracer; cellulolytic bacteria; citrate synthase; glycolytic pathways; isoleucine biosynthesis; metabolic flux analysis; tricarboxylic acid cycle
Year: 2018 PMID: 30190711 PMCID: PMC6115520 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01947
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Figure 1Tracing the glycolytic flux using 1-13C-glucose. Relative flux from different glycolytic pathways can be mirrored by the labeling pattern of serine. The unlabeled carbons are represented by open circles and labeled carbons are shown in red. The carbon number shown in each circle is from corresponding carbon in 1-13C-glucose. GAP, Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate; OPP pathway, Oxidative Pentose Phosphate pathway.
Figure 2Calculation of flux ratio: Serine from the EMP pathway (f). Upon [1-13C] glucose labeling, the serine molecules originate through the EMP pathway will lead to half of the serine molecules labeled at position 3 of serine(m1: 0.5) while the other half will be unlabeled (m0: 0.5) (shown in blue). If the serine molecules originate from other pathways, none of the molecules will be labeled (m0: 1, shown in black). The final MDV of serine (shown in orange) is the cooperative result of these two possibilities and the splitting ratio (f) can be analyzed quantitatively. The algorithm is based on (Nanchen et al., 2007).
Figure 3The activity of the ED pathway can be mirrored by pyruvate labeling pattern. If fluxes go through the ED pathway, [1-13C]glucose tracer will lead to pyruvate labeling at carboxylic group (C1). If fluxes go through the EMP pathway, pyruvate can be labeled at the C3 position. According to labeling pattern of alanine, the direct product of pyruvate, there is no significant labeling at C1 of pyruvate, indicating negligible activity of the ED pathway. KDPG, 2-keto-3-deoxygluconate-6-phosphate; FBP, Fructose 1,6-bisphosphate; DHAP, Dihydroxyacetone phosphate; GAP, glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate; Pyr, pyruvate.
Figure 413C-formate tracer for analyzing the flux in the one-carbon pathway (n = 2, SD < 1%).
Figure 5The stereospecificity of citrate synthase revealed by a 13C-bicarbonate labeling experiment (A) using GC-MS fragments Glu2-5 and Glu1-2 as the readouts (B). The Re- citrate synthase will result in the labeling at the C5, thus consistent with one carbon labeled Glu2-5 fragment. The Si- citrate synthase activity will result in the labeling at the C1 position and lead to one carbon labeled Glu1-2 fragment.
Figure 6The metabolic flux from 2-oxoglutarate to oxaloacetate in oxidative direction analyzed by flux ratio approach using 20% [U-13C6] glucose plus 80% unlabeled glucose (A) and pulse labeling experiment using [U-13C5] glutamate as the tracer (B).
Figure 7Flux map profiled from 13C-tracer experiment. Net fluxes are represented by proportionally-scaled arrow thickness and are normalized to a glucose monomer consumption rate of 100 (3.62 ± 0.18 mmol/gDW/h). Dotted arrows indicate fluxes toward biomass synthesis. Complete results including flux values with the 95% flux confidence interval are listed in Supplementary File 1. Abbreviations for metabolites: G6P, Glucose 6-phosphate; Ru5P, Ribulose 5-phosphate; RuBP, Ribulose bisphosphate; F6P, fructose 6-phosphate; R5P, Ribose 5-phosphate; FBP, Fructose bisphosphate; X5P, Xylulose 5-phosphate; E4P, Erythrose 4-phosphate; DHAP, Dihydroxyacetone phosphate; GAP, Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate; SBP, Sedoheptulose bisphosphate; S7P, Sedoheptulose 7-phosphate; PGA, Phosphoglycerate; PEP, Phosphoenolpyruvate; PYR, pyruvate; AcCoA, Acetyl Coenzyme A; CIT, Citrate; ICT, Isocitrate; 2OG, 2-oxoglutarate; FUM, Fumarate; MAL, Malate; OAA, Oxaloacetate. Abbreviations for reactions: ACO, Aconitase; CS, citrate synthase; ENO, Enolase; FBA, Fructose bisphosphate aldolase; FUS, Fumarase; ICTDH, Isocitrate dehydrogenase; MDH, Malate dehydrogenase; ME, malic enzyme; PDH, pyruvate dehydrogenase; PEPC, Phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase; PFK, Phosphofructosekinase; PFOR, pyruvate: ferredoxin oxidoreductase; PGI, Phosphoglucose isomerase; PK, pyruvate kinase; PPDK, Pyruvate phosphate dikinase; PRK, Phosphoribulokinase; PPE, Phosphopentose epimerase; PPI, Pentose phosphate isomerase; TAL, transaldolase;TKT, Transketolase; TPI, Triosephosphate isomerase; SBA, Sedoheptulose bisphosphate aldolase; SBPS, Sedoheptulose bisphosphatase.