| Literature DB >> 30190709 |
Sophia Johler1, Eva M Kalbhenn2, Nicole Heini1, Peter Brodmann3, Sylvia Gautsch3, Murat Bağcioğlu1,2, Matthias Contzen4, Roger Stephan1, Monika Ehling-Schulz2.
Abstract
While the relevance of Bacillus (B.) cereus as a major cause of gastroenteritis is undisputed, the role of the closely related B. thuringiensis in foodborne disease is unclear. B. thuringiensis strains frequently harbor enterotoxin genes. However, the organism has only very rarely been associated with foodborne outbreaks, possibly due to the fact that during outbreak investigations, B. cereus is routinely not differentiated from B. thuringiensis. A recent EFSA scientific opinion stresses the urgent need for further data allowing for improved risk assessment, in particular as B. thuringiensis is a commonly used biopesticide. Therefore, the aim of this study was to gain further insights into the hazardous potential of B. thuringiensis. To this end, 39 B. thuringiensis isolates obtained from commercially used biopesticides, various food sources, as well as from foodborne outbreaks were characterized by panC typing, panC-based SplitsTree analysis, toxin gene profiling, FTIR spectroscopic analysis, a cytotoxicity assay screening for enterotoxic activity, and a sphingomyelinase assay. The majority of the tested B. thuringiensis isolates exhibited low (23%, n = 9) or mid level enterotoxicity (74%, n = 29), and produced either no (59%, n = 23) or low levels (33%, n = 13) of sphingomyelinase, which is reported to act synergistically with enterotoxins Nhe and Hbl. One strain isolated from rosemary was however classified as highly enterotoxic surpassing the cytotoxic activity of the high-level reference strain by a factor of 1.5. This strain also produced vast amounts of sphingomyelinase. Combining all results obtained in this study into a fingerprint pattern, several enterotoxic biopesticide strains were indistinguishable from those of isolates from foods or collected in association with outbreaks. Our study shows that many B. thuringiensis biopesticide strains exhibit mid-level cytotoxicity in a Vero cell assay and that some of these strains cannot be differentiated from isolates collected from foods or in association with outbreaks. Thus, we demonstrate that the use of B. thuringiensis strains as biopesticides can represent a food safety risk, underpinning the importance of assessing the hazardous potential of each strain and formulation used.Entities:
Keywords: Bacillus cereus group; Bacillus thuringiensis; Vero cell assay; enterotoxicity; sphingomyelinase
Year: 2018 PMID: 30190709 PMCID: PMC6115515 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01915
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Background information on the seven Bacillus thuringiensis biopesticide strains included in this study.
| GC-91 | CH_186 | |
| ABTS-1857 | CH_181 | |
| CH_185 | ||
| B401 | P05_2 | |
| SA-11 | CH_164 | |
| ABTS-351 | CH_183 | |
| Solbac | CH_133 | |
| NB-176 | CH_187 |
If no strain was specified on the product, trade names are given.
Background information on the Bacillus thuringiensis isolates collected from food sources included in this study.
| CH_9 | Heated chicken breast | Army catering facility |
| CH_10 | Heated tomatoes | Army catering facility |
| CH_19 | Pork roast | Army catering facility |
| CH_24 | Heated potatoes | Army catering facility |
| CH_26 | Pollack filet & sauce | Army catering facility |
| CH_34 | Runner beans | Army catering facility |
| CH_35 | Ratatouille | Army catering facility |
| CH_40 | Rosemary | Retail level |
| CH_41 | Asia Mix (peppermint, coriander, thai chives) | Retail level |
| CH_42 | Organic oregano | Retail level |
| CH_43 | Organic sage | Retail level |
| CH_44 | Organic peppermint | Retail level |
| CH_48 | Rosemary | Retail level |
| CH_50 | Organic coriander | Retail level |
| CH_65 | Tarragon | Retail level |
| CH_66 | Basil | Retail level |
| CH_69 | Lasagna (precooked) | Surveillance |
| CH_72 | Vegetable juice (spinach, carrot, cucumber, mint) | Surveillance |
| CH_81 | Sauce (precooked) | Surveillance |
| CH_95 | Sushi | Retail level |
| CH_96 | Sushi | Retail level |
| CH_160 | Heated pasta | Surveillance |
| P01_1 | Honey | Self-surveillance |
| P01_3 | Honey | Self-surveillance |
Background information on the seven Bacillus thuringiensis isolates collected in association with outbreaks.
| Lower Austria | 2/27/S | Human feces | Vetmeduni | 2013 |
| Lower Austria | 6/27/S | Human feces | Vetmeduni | 2013 |
| Lower Austria | 1/29 AGES | Fruit salad | AGES | 2013 |
| Linz | 3/22 AGES | Bell pepper | AGES | 2013 |
| Germany | CVUAS 2492 | Lettuce | CVUAS | 2012 |
| Germany | CVUAS 9660 | Lettuce | CVUAS | 2012 |
| Germany | CVUAS 9659 | Lettuce | CVUAS | 2012 |
AGES, Austrian Agency for Health and Food Safety; CVUAS, Chemisches und Veterinäruntersuchungsamt Stuttgart; Vetmeduni, University of Veterinary MedicineVienna.
Characterization results of the Bacillus thuringiensis isolates included in this study.
| P | CH_186 | A | a | FTIR-A2 | IV | 0.3 | 0.0 | Low | 0.00 | 0.00 | ≤detection limit |
| P | CH_181 | A | a | FTIR-A1 | IV | 0.4 | 0.1 | Mid | 0.16 | 0.14 | Low |
| P | CH_185 | A | a | FTIR-A1 | IV | 0.5 | 0.2 | Mid | 0.06 | 0.05 | Low |
| P | P05_2 | A | a | FTIR-A1 | IV | 0.4 | 0.0 | Mid | 0.13 | 0.03 | ≤detection limit |
| P | CH_164 | A | b | FTIR-B2 | IV | 0.8 | 0.1 | Mid | 0.00 | 0.00 | ≤detection limit |
| P | CH_183 | A | b | FTIR-B2 | IV | 0.4 | 0.1 | Mid | 0.00 | 0.00 | ≤detection limit |
| P | CH_133 | A | c | FTIR-B1 | IV | 0.8 | 0.3 | Mid | 0.04 | 0.03 | ≤detection limit |
| P | CH_187 | C | d | FTIR-S | IV | 0.2 | 0.0 | Low | 0.00 | 0.00 | ≤detection limit |
| F | CH_9 | D | b | FTIR-B2 | IV | 0.4 | 0.1 | Mid | 0.00 | 0.00 | ≤detection limit |
| F | CH_10 | D | b | FTIR-B2 | IV | 0.4 | 0.1 | Mid | 0.00 | 0.00 | ≤detection limit |
| F | CH_19 | D | b | FTIR-B2 | IV | 0.3 | 0.0 | Low | 0.00 | 0.00 | ≤detection limit |
| F | CH_24 | D | b | FTIR-B2 | IV | 0.4 | 0.1 | Mid | 0.00 | 0.00 | ≤detection limit |
| F | CH_26 | F | b | FTIR-A1 | IV | 0.5 | 0.1 | Mid | 0.00 | 0.00 | ≤detection limit |
| F | CH_34 | A | b | FTIR-B2 | IV | 0.2 | 0.0 | Low | 0.00 | 0.00 | ≤detection limit |
| F | CH_35 | A | b | FTIR-A1 | IV | 0.1 | 0.0 | Low | 0.00 | 0.00 | ≤detection limit |
| F | CH_40 | A | b | FTIR-B2 | IV | 0.8 | 0.1 | Mid | 0.00 | 0.00 | ≤detection limit |
| F | CH_41 | A | b | FTIR-A1 | IV | 0.8 | 0.1 | Mid | 0.00 | 0.00 | ≤detection limit |
| F | CH_42 | A | b | FTIR-B2 | IV | 0.7 | 0.0 | Mid | 0.00 | 0.00 | ≤detection limit |
| F | CH_43 | A | b | FTIR-A1 | IV | 0.8 | 0.1 | Mid | 0.00 | 0.00 | ≤detection limit |
| F | CH_44 | A | b | FTIR-B2 | IV | 0.6 | 0.1 | Mid | 0.00 | 0.00 | ≤detection limit |
| F | CH_48 | C | d | FTIR-B2 | IV | 1.5 | 0.3 | High | 1.21 | 0.12 | High |
| F | CH_50 | A | g | FTIR-A2 | IV | 0.5 | 0.1 | Mid | 0.60 | 0.42 | Medium |
| F | CH_65 | A | a | FTIR-A2 | IV | 0.2 | 0.0 | Low | 0.00 | 0.00 | ≤detection limit |
| F | CH_66 | A | a | FTIR-A2 | IV | 0.4 | 0.0 | Mid | 0.00 | 0.00 | ≤detection limit |
| F | CH_69 | A | b | FTIR-B1 | IV | 0.5 | 0.1 | Mid | 0.00 | 0.00 | ≤detection limit |
| F | CH_72 | A | a | FTIR-A1 | IV | 0.5 | 0.1 | Mid | 0.14 | 0.11 | Low |
| F | CH_81 | A | e | FTIR-A1 | IV | 0.7 | 0.1 | Mid | 0.01 | 0.02 | Low |
| F | CH_95 | F | f | FTIR-A2 | V | 0.2 | 0.0 | Low | 0.08 | 0.08 | Low |
| F | CH_96 | A | b | FTIR-B2 | IV | 0.4 | 0.0 | Mid | 1.14 | 0.16 | High |
| F | CH_160 | A | b | FTIR-A1 | IV | 0.7 | 0.0 | Mid | 0.00 | 0.00 | ≤detection limit |
| F | P01_1 | A | a | FTIR-A1 | IV | 0.7 | 0.0 | Mid | 0.11 | 0.01 | Low |
| F | P03_1 | A | a | FTIR-A1 | IV | 0.6 | 0.1 | Mid | 0.14 | 0.01 | Low |
| O | 2/27/S | A | a | FTIR-A1 | IV | 0.5 | 0.1 | Mid | 0.15 | 0.10 | Low |
| O | 6/27/S | A | a | FTIR-A1 | IV | 0.5 | 0.2 | Mid | 0.14 | 0.11 | Low |
| O | 1/29 AGES | A | b | FTIR-A1 | IV | 0.3 | 0.1 | Low | 0.00 | 0.00 | ≤detection limit |
| O | 3/22 AGES | A | b | FTIR-B2 | IV | 0.3 | 0.1 | Low | 0.00 | 0.00 | ≤detection limit |
| O | CVUAS 2492 | A | a | FTIR-A1 | IV | 0.4 | 0.0 | Mid | 0.12 | 0.09 | Low |
| O | CVUAS 9660 | A | a | FTIR-A1 | IV | 0.4 | 0.0 | Mid | 0.16 | 0.14 | Low |
| O | CVUAS 9659 | A | a | FTIR-A1 | IV | 0.4 | 0.0 | Mid | 0.30 | 0.25 | Low |
Isolates obtained from pesticides (P), foods (F), or in association with outbreaks (O).
Toxin profiles A–G correspond to the presence of the following combinations of toxin genes: A, nhe, hbl, cytK; B, nhe, cytK, ces; C, nhe, hbl; D, nhe, cytK; E, nhe, ces; F, nhe; G, cytK.
All cytK positive isolates detected in this study harbored cytK-2.
Singleton (S) in the cluster A.
Values represent absolute values normalized using the absolute value of the highly toxic reference strain NVH 0075/95 included in the same run. Strains were classified as low level, mid level, or high level enterotoxin producers in adaptation of Jeßberger et al. (.
The limit of detection was determined using a SMase dilution series. The lowest amount of SMase that yielded a positive test result after 20 min was 0.444 mU, with one unit of SMase being defined as the amount of SMase that will hydrolyse 1 μmol of TNPAL-sphingomyelin per minute (at pH 7.4 and 37°C). SMase levels of ≤ 0.400 mU yielded a negative result under the same test conditions.
Figure 1SplitsTree depicting the relatedness of the tested isolates based on panC sequence variations (A: overview over full SplitsTree, (B) detail zooming in on region depicting isolates assigned to panC type IV). SplitsTree generates unrooted phylogenetic networks from molecular sequence data. Proximity is used as an indicator of sequence similarity and thus relatedness of the respective isolates. Each of the 37 B. thuringiensis isolates exhibited one of only seven different panC nucleotide sequences. To improve readability of the network, these seven sequence variations are presented as clusters a-g. With the exception of one strain assigned to panC type V (CH_95, cluster f), all strains were assigned to panC type IV and clustered closely together, indicating that these isolates are closely related.
Figure 2Dendrogram depicting similarity of FTIR spectra of B. thuringiensis isolated from different biopesticides, foods, and in connection to foodborne outbreaks. This analysis revealed two main clusters, designated FTIR-A and FTIR-B. Cluster FTIR-A comprised the B. thuringiensis ssp. aizawai strains. The biopesticide strain NB-176 (B. thuringiensis ssp. morrisoni) forms a singleton within this cluster. The two subclusters of FTIR-B can be assigned to B. thuringiensis ssp. kurstaki and B. thuringiensis ssp. israelensis, respectively.
Figure 3Overview of Vero cell cytotoxicity used to determine enterotoxin production. Values represent absolute values normalized using the absolute value of the highly toxic reference strain NVH 0075/95 included in the same run. The majority of the B. thuringiensis isolates including most biopesticide strains and the isolates linked to the outbreak in Germany in 2012 were classified as medium level enterotoxin producers (indicated in yellow). One food isolate was classified as high level enterotoxin producer surpassing the cytotoxicity of the highly toxic reference strain by a factor of 1.5 (indicated in red). Several isolates, including the biopesticide strains GC-91 and NB-176 were classified as low level enterotoxin producers (indicated in green).
Figure 4Overview of sphingomyelinase production of the B. thuringiensis isolates. Values represent Amplex Red results normalized using NVH 0075/95 (high-level SMase producer). For the majority of B. thuringiensis isolates, no SMase production was detectable (indicating that ≤ 0.400 mU of SMase were produced). Two isolates from food (CH_48 from rosemary and CH_96 from sushi) produced high levels of SMase. Interestingly, CH_48 also produced massive amounts of enterotoxins, surpassing the cytotoxicity of the highly toxic reference strain by a factor of 1.5.
Overview of biopesticide isolates and identical characterization patterns (toxin gene profile, panC type, panC-based SplitsTree cluster, FTIR cluster, cytotoxicity in a Vero cell assay, and SMase activity) determined for food or outbreak isolates.
| GC-91 | A | IV | a | FTIR-A2 | Mid | ≤detection limit | 1 (tarragon) | 0 |
| ABTS-1857 and B401 | A | IV | a | FTIR-A1 | Mid | Low | 3 (vegetable juice, 2 honey samples) | 5 (3 salad samples Germany 2012; 2 human feces samples Austria 2013) |
| SA-11 and ABTS-351 | A | IV | b | FTIR-B2 | Mid | ≤detection limit | 3 (spices) | 0 |
| Solbac | A | IV | c | FTIR-B1 | Mid | ≤detection limit | 0 | 0 |
| NB-176 | C | IV | d | FTIR-S | Low | ≤detection limit | 0 | 0 |
Nineteen isolates exhibited a pattern not identified in a biopesticide strain and were therefore not included in this table.
In case no strain ID was provided on the product, trade names are used.
Toxin profiles A–G correspond to the presence of the following combinations of toxin genes: A, nhe, hbl, cytK; B, nhe, cytK, ces; C, nhe, hbl; D, nhe, cytK; E, nhe, ces; F, nhe; G, cytK.
Both ABTS-1857 and the B401 biopesticide isolates included in this study exhibited the same characterization pattern, which was detected again in isolates from foods and outbreaks.
SA-11, ABTS-351, and three isolates from spices exhibited identical characterization patterns.