| Literature DB >> 30189875 |
Sarah M Rothman1, Keith Q Tanis2, Pallavi Gandhi3, Vladislav Malkov4, Jacob Marcus5, Michelle Pearson5, Richard Stevens4, Jason Gilliland2, Christopher Ware3, Veeravan Mahadomrongkul3, Elaine O'Loughlin3, Gonzalo Zeballos3, Roger Smith6, Bonnie J Howell7, Joel Klappenbach4, Matthew Kennedy3, Christian Mirescu8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a chronic neurodegenerative disease with pathological hallmarks including the formation of extracellular aggregates of amyloid-beta (Aβ) known as plaques and intracellular tau tangles. Coincident with the formation of Aβ plaques is recruitment and activation of glial cells to the plaque forming a plaque niche. In addition to histological data showing the formation of the niche, AD genetic studies have added to the growing appreciation of how dysfunctional glia pathways drive neuropathology, with emphasis on microglia pathways. Genomic approaches enable comparisons of human disease profiles between different mouse models informing on their utility to evaluate secondary changes to triggers such as Aβ deposition.Entities:
Keywords: Alzheimer’s disease; Microglia; Neuroinflammation; Plaque; Transcriptomics
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30189875 PMCID: PMC6127905 DOI: 10.1186/s12974-018-1265-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Neuroinflammation ISSN: 1742-2094 Impact factor: 8.322
Fig. 1Transcriptional changes in aging Tg2576 and TgCRND8 brain. a Student’s t test p value distributions for gene expression differences between WT and Tg2576 (left plot) or TgCRND8 (right plot) at different ages. Gray line indicates expected false discovery rate (FDR) given multiple test comparisons. b Heatmap showing log10 ratio values from each sample (y-axis) for each gene (x-axis) with t test p < 0.001 between Tg2576 (green) and TgCRND8 (blue) versus WT littermate controls at one or more ages. Samples are ordered manually by genotype as indicated. Genes are ordered by test and agglomerative clustering. c Heatmaps showing log10 ratio values from each sample (y-axis) for each gene (x-axis) within the indicated gene sets. Samples are ordered manually by genotype as indicated. Genes are ordered by agglomerative clustering within each set. d Signature scores (average of gene values in C ± standard deviation) for the indicated gene sets over age in Tg2576 (green) and WT littermate control (gray) as well as TgCRND8 (blue) and WT littermate controls (black)
Fig. 2Localization of TREM2 and Cd33 around amyloid-beta (Aβ) plaques in the aged TgCRND8 mouse. Brain slices were prepared from 35-week-old wild-type and TgCRND8 mice and processed for amyloid-beta immunohistochemistry (6E10 labeling, magenta) combined with TREM2 (panel a) or CD33 (panel b) in situ hybridization via RNAScope (brown). Visualization of TREM2 and Cd33 confirms their associated expression pattern with Aβ pathology, supporting the rationale for laser capture microdissection of Thio-S-labeled plaques for transcriptome-wide RNA sequencing. Representative images show section sampling for LCM and RNA seq (c, d). Images show Iba1 (brown) and 6E10 (magenta) immunostainings. Scale bars, 50 and 100 μm
Fig. 3Plaque-niche gene expression differences in 6-month-old TgCRND8. a Student’s t test p value distributions for gene expression differences plaque and normal samples in TgCRND8 cortex at 6 months of age. Gray line indicates expected false discovery rate (FDR) given multiple test comparisons. b Heatmap showing log10 ratio values from each sample (y-axis) for each gene (x-axis) with t test p value < 0.001 between plaque and normal tissue in TgCRND8 cortex. Samples are ordered manually by genotype as indicated. Genes are ordered by agglomerative clustering. c Heatmaps showing log10 ratio values from each sample (y-axis) for each gene (x-axis) within the indicated gene sets. Samples are ordered manually by genotype as indicated. Genes are ordered by agglomerative clustering within each set
Fig. 4Overlap of TgCRND8 progression signature and plaque-niche signature. a Heatmap showing log10 ratio values from each LCM sample (y-axis) for each gene (x-axis) detected in both the LCM and whole cortex studies and with t test p < 0.001 between TgCRND8 and WT cortex at one or more ages. Samples are ordered manually by genotype as indicated. Genes are ordered by agglomerative clustering. b Heatmap showing log10 ratio values from each whole cortex sample (y-axis) for each gene (x-axis) detected in both the whole cortex and LCM studies and with t test p < 0.001 between plaque and normal tissue in TgCRND8 cortex. Samples are ordered manually by genotype as indicated. Genes are ordered by agglomerative clustering. c Venn diagram depicting number of genes in common between signatures in a and b, and the associated hypergeometric p value given 12,130 genes detected in both experiments
Fig. 5Overlap of TgCRND8 progression signature and plaque-niche signature. a, b Heatmap showing log10 ratio values from each whole cortex sample (a) or each LCM sample (b) for genes reported to be expressed higher (> 1.5 fold, p < 1e-5) in the DAM population [37]. Samples are ordered manually by genotype and age as indicated. Genes are ordered by agglomerative clustering. c Venn diagram depicting number of genes in common between the Tg576/TgCRND8 whole cortex signatures (p < 0.001, any age) and the genes expressed higher (> 1.5 fold, p < 1e-5) in the DAM cells. d Venn diagram depicting number of genes in common between the TgCRND8 LCM plaque signature (p < 0.001) and the genes expressed higher (> 1.5 fold, p < 1e-5) in the DAM population