Grzegorz Łabuz1, Dominik Knebel1, Gerd U Auffarth2, Hui Fang1, Thomas Jtp van den Berg3, Timur M Yildirim1, Hyeck-Soo Son1, Ramin Khoramnia1. 1. The David J. Apple International Laboratory for Ocular Pathology, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany. 2. The David J. Apple International Laboratory for Ocular Pathology, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany. Electronic address: Gerd.Auffarth@med.uni-heidelberg.de. 3. Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To study the glistening formation in various hydrophobic-acrylic intraocular lens (IOL) models, and to evaluate the effect of glistenings on light scattering in these IOLs. DESIGN: Laboratory investigation. METHODS: The susceptibility of the hydrophobic-acrylic material to develop glistenings was evaluated in 6 IOL models. Accelerated lens aging was induced by immersing the IOLs in a solution at 45 C for 24 hours and cooled to 37 C for 2.5 hours. Light microscopy and image acquisition were performed. Glistening statistics-that is, microvacuoles' (MV) number and size-were derived from image analysis. Light scattering was measured using a clinical device featuring an adaptation for in vitro IOL assessment. RESULTS: The number of glistenings differed among the studied IOLs and ranged from 0 to 3532 MV/mm2. In 1 model, glistenings were found only at the periphery, with diffuse light scattering observed centrally despite the absence of microvacuoles. The mean size of glistenings ranged from 5.2 to 10.2 μm. The mean straylight parameter of the IOLs increased from 0.6 to 5.0 deg2/sr after accelerated aging. Straylight elevation demonstrated a proportional relationship with the glistening number. CONCLUSIONS: We showed that hydrophobic-acrylic lenses differ in their resistance to glistenings, as one group proved to be glistening-free, but the other models revealed varying grades of glistenings. Moreover, we demonstrated that the presence of glistenings results in increased straylight, and that straylight proportionally depends on the glistenings number irrespective of the IOL model. However, more research is needed to confirm that the relationship we found holds for all hydrophobic-acrylic IOLs.
PURPOSE: To study the glistening formation in various hydrophobic-acrylic intraocular lens (IOL) models, and to evaluate the effect of glistenings on light scattering in these IOLs. DESIGN: Laboratory investigation. METHODS: The susceptibility of the hydrophobic-acrylic material to develop glistenings was evaluated in 6 IOL models. Accelerated lens aging was induced by immersing the IOLs in a solution at 45 C for 24 hours and cooled to 37 C for 2.5 hours. Light microscopy and image acquisition were performed. Glistening statistics-that is, microvacuoles' (MV) number and size-were derived from image analysis. Light scattering was measured using a clinical device featuring an adaptation for in vitro IOL assessment. RESULTS: The number of glistenings differed among the studied IOLs and ranged from 0 to 3532 MV/mm2. In 1 model, glistenings were found only at the periphery, with diffuse light scattering observed centrally despite the absence of microvacuoles. The mean size of glistenings ranged from 5.2 to 10.2 μm. The mean straylight parameter of the IOLs increased from 0.6 to 5.0 deg2/sr after accelerated aging. Straylight elevation demonstrated a proportional relationship with the glistening number. CONCLUSIONS: We showed that hydrophobic-acrylic lenses differ in their resistance to glistenings, as one group proved to be glistening-free, but the other models revealed varying grades of glistenings. Moreover, we demonstrated that the presence of glistenings results in increased straylight, and that straylight proportionally depends on the glistenings number irrespective of the IOL model. However, more research is needed to confirm that the relationship we found holds for all hydrophobic-acrylic IOLs.
Authors: Timur M Yildirim; Ramin Khoramnia; Sonja K Schickhardt; Donald J Munro; Patrick R Merz; Hyeck-Soo Son; Ingo Lieberwirth; Gerd U Auffarth Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep Date: 2020-06-24
Authors: Timur M Yildirim; Sonja K Schickhardt; Qiang Wang; Elfriede Friedmann; Ramin Khoramnia; Gerd U Auffarth Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-04-30 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Adrián Hernández-Martínez; Miguel A Díaz-Del-Rio; María Ruiz-Santos; Ramón Ruiz-Mesa; Pedro Tañá-Rivero Journal: Clin Ophthalmol Date: 2022-08-10
Authors: Timur M Yildirim; Hui Fang; Sonja K Schickhardt; Qiang Wang; Patrick R Merz; Gerd U Auffarth Journal: BMC Ophthalmol Date: 2020-05-06 Impact factor: 2.209