Literature DB >> 30187418

Estimation of formaldehyde occupational exposure limit based on genetic damage in some Iranian exposed workers using benchmark dose method.

Rezvan Zendehdel1,2, Masoomeh Vahabi3, Roya Sedghi4.   

Abstract

The present study evaluated an occupational exposure level for formaldehyde employing benchmark dose (BMD) approach. Dose-response relationship was determined by utilizing cumulative occupational exposure dose and DNA damage. Based on this goal, outcome of comet assay for some Iranian exposed people in occupational exposure individuals was used. In order to assess formaldehyde exposure, 53 occupationally exposed individuals selected from four melamine tableware workshops and 34 unexposed subjects as a control group were examined. The occupational exposure dose was carried out according to the NIOSH-3500 method, and the DNA damage was obtained by employing comet assay in peripheral blood cells. EPA Benchmark Dose Software was employed for calculating BMD and BMDL. Cumulative exposure dose of formaldehyde was between of 2.4 and 1972 mg. According to the findings of the current study, the induction of DNA damage in the exposed persons was increased tail length and tail moment (p < 0.001), when compared to controls. Finally, an acceptable dose-response relationship was obtained in three-category information between formaldehyde cumulative exposure doses and genetic toxicity. BMDL was 0.034 mg/m3 (0.028 ppm), corresponding to genetic damage of peripheral blood cells. It can be concluded that the occupational permissible limit in Iranian people could be at levels lower than OSHA standards.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Benchmark dose; Comet assay; DNA damages; Formaldehyde; Occupational exposure limit

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30187418     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-018-3077-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  36 in total

1.  Detecting genotoxicity using the Comet assay following chronic exposure of Manila clam Tapes semidecussatus to polluted estuarine sediments.

Authors:  B M Coughlan; M G J Hartl; S J O'Reilly; D Sheehan; C Morthersill; F N A M van Pelt; J O'Halloran; N M O'Brien
Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 5.553

Review 2.  Exposure to formaldehyde and its potential human health hazards.

Authors:  Ki-Hyun Kim; Shamin Ara Jahan; Jong-Tae Lee
Journal:  J Environ Sci Health C Environ Carcinog Ecotoxicol Rev       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.781

3.  Formaldehyde, 2-butoxyethanol and 1-tert-butoxypropan-2-ol.

Authors: 
Journal:  IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum       Date:  2006

Review 4.  Environmental and occupational biomonitoring using the Comet assay.

Authors:  Mahara Valverde; Emilio Rojas
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2008-11-14       Impact factor: 2.433

5.  The comet assay: a sensitive method for detecting DNA damage in individual cells.

Authors:  Wenjuan Liao; Michael A McNutt; Wei-Guo Zhu
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2009-03-06       Impact factor: 3.608

Review 6.  Risk assessment of formaldehyde for the general population in Japan.

Authors:  Masato Naya; Junko Nakanishi
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2005-09-23       Impact factor: 3.271

7.  Benchmark dose approach for renal dysfunction in workers exposed to lead.

Authors:  Tian Lin; Jin Tai-Yi
Journal:  Environ Toxicol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.119

8.  Quantification of DNA repair capacity in whole blood of patients with head and neck cancer and healthy donors by comet assay.

Authors:  Daniel T Saha; Bruce J Davidson; Antai Wang; Allison J Pollock; Roy A Orden; Radoslav Goldman
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2007-10-18       Impact factor: 2.433

9.  Long-term biomonitoring of breast cancer patients under adjuvant chemotherapy: the comet assay as a possible predictive factor.

Authors:  E Uriol; M Sierra; M A Comendador; J Fra; P Martínez-Camblor; A J Lacave; L M Sierra
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2012-09-17       Impact factor: 3.000

Review 10.  Recent trend in risk assessment of formaldehyde exposures from indoor air.

Authors:  Gunnar Damgård Nielsen; Søren Thor Larsen; Peder Wolkoff
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 5.153

View more
  2 in total

1.  Development of a Simple and Powerful Analytical Method for Formaldehyde Detection and Quantitation in Blood Samples.

Authors:  Yong-Hyun Kim; Jeongsik Park
Journal:  J Anal Methods Chem       Date:  2020-12-30       Impact factor: 2.193

2.  RNA oxidation in chromatin modification and DNA-damage response following exposure to formaldehyde.

Authors:  Juan C Gonzalez-Rivera; Mark W Sherman; Dongyu S Wang; Jamie C L Chuvalo-Abraham; Lea Hildebrandt Ruiz; Lydia M Contreras
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 4.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.