Literature DB >> 19056514

Environmental and occupational biomonitoring using the Comet assay.

Mahara Valverde1, Emilio Rojas.   

Abstract

Biomonitoring of human populations exposed to potential mutagens or carcinogens can provide an early detection system for the initiation of cell disregulation in the development of cancer. In recent years, the Comet assay, also known as a "single cell gel" (SCG) electrophoresis assay, has become an important tool for assessing DNA damage in exposed populations. This is the method of choice for population-based studies of environmental and occupational exposure to air pollutants, metals, pesticides, radiation, and other xenobiotics as we show in this review. To appreciate the role of the Comet assay in the field of biomonitoring, we review data from 122 studies that employed the assay. These studies evaluated environmental versus occupational exposures and the levels of DNA damage in cells of individuals exposed in each case. Our review of the literature reveals the importance of the need to establish standard methodological conditions that affect unwinding and electrophoresis times and tail values (tail length, tail DNA, tail moment), with the goal of being able to compare data collected in different laboratories throughout the world. The Comet assay is susceptible to subtle artifacts of manipulation depending on the type and timing of sampling performed. Therefore, in the reporting of DNA damage detected by the Comet assay, the context of how the DNA damage was created also needs to be reported and considered in the interpretation of Comet assay results. The success of the Comet assay is reflected by its use over the past 20 years in the field of biomonitoring, and by the increasing number of studies that continue to report its use. As the shortcomings of the assay are identified and considered in the interpretation of DNA damage detection, the Comet assay will continue to provide improved reliability as a biomarker in human biomonitoring studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19056514     DOI: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2008.11.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  26 in total

1.  Single cell trapping and DNA damage analysis using microwell arrays.

Authors:  David K Wood; David M Weingeist; Sangeeta N Bhatia; Bevin P Engelward
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Assessment of DNA damage in floriculturists in southern Brazil.

Authors:  Camila Mörschbächer Wilhelm; Adriani Kunz Calsing; Luciano Basso da Silva
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Oxidative stress and early DNA damage in workers exposed to iron-rich metal fumes.

Authors:  Masoud Pandeh; Saedeh Fathi; Mohammad Javad Zare Sakhvidi; Javad Zavar Reza; Lyla Sedghian
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 4.  Applicability of the comet assay in evaluation of DNA damage in healthcare providers' working with antineoplastic drugs: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mohammad Javad Zare Sakhvidi; Mohammad Hajaghazadeh; Mehrdad Mostaghaci; Amir Houshang Mehrparvar; Fariba Zare Sakhvidi; Elham Naghshineh
Journal:  Int J Occup Environ Health       Date:  2016-04-25

5.  Marine pollution risk in a coastal city: use of an eco-genotoxic tool as a stress indicator in mussels from the Eastern Aegean Sea.

Authors:  Asli Kacar; Idil Pazi; Tolga Gonul; Filiz Kucuksezgin
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  The level of DNA damage in mouse hematopoietic cells and in frog and human blood cells, as induced by the action of reactive oxygen species in vitro.

Authors:  Nikolay Sirota; Elena Kuznetsova; Irina Mitroshina
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 1.925

7.  Micropatterned comet assay enables high throughput and sensitive DNA damage quantification.

Authors:  Jing Ge; Danielle N Chow; Jessica L Fessler; David M Weingeist; David K Wood; Bevin P Engelward
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.000

8.  Effects on DNA Damage and/or Repair Processes as Biological Mechanisms Linking Psychological Stress to Cancer Risk.

Authors:  Frank J Jenkins; Bennett Van Houten; Dana H Bovbjerg
Journal:  J Appl Biobehav Res       Date:  2014-02-01

9.  Evaluating In Vitro DNA Damage Using Comet Assay.

Authors:  Yanxin Lu; Yang Liu; Chunzhang Yang
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2017-10-11       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 10.  QPCR: a tool for analysis of mitochondrial and nuclear DNA damage in ecotoxicology.

Authors:  Joel N Meyer
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2010-01-05       Impact factor: 2.823

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.