Régis Vaillancourt1, Christina Khoury2, Annie Pouliot3. 1. , OMM, CD, BPharm, PharmD, FCSHP, is with the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Ontario. 2. , BS, MSc, is a PharmD candidate with the School of Pharmacy, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario. 3. , PhD, was, at the time this study was conducted, affiliated with the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Ontario.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Medication preparation and administration are higher-risk steps in the medication management process. Therefore, medication management strategies, such as warnings and education about medication safety, are essential in preventing errors and improving the safe handling of medications by health care workers. OBJECTIVES: To validate comprehension of 9 pictograms designed to improve medication safety, and to assess long-term recall of these pictograms in a sample of pharmacy students. METHODS: First- and second-year pharmacy students were recruited as participants. The study was divided into 2 phases: comprehension (Phase 1) and long-term recall (Phase 2). In Phase 1, a slideshow of the 9 pictograms was presented to participants, who were asked to write the meaning of and required action for each pictogram. The intended meaning of each pictogram was then presented to the participants. Four weeks later, long-term recall was assessed in Phase 2 of the study using the same method. The meaning and required action that participants provided for each pictogram were reviewed by 3 independent raters. A pictogram was considered to be validated in the pharmacy student population if at least 67% of participants identified the correct meaning or required action during the recall phase. RESULTS: A total of 101 pharmacy students participated in Phase 1 and 67 in Phase 2. In Phase 1, 4 pictograms met the 67% threshold for comprehension. In Phase 2, after training, 7 of the 9 pictograms were validated. CONCLUSIONS: Given the results obtained with pharmacy students, redesign may be necessary for 2 of the pictograms. The use of validated medication safety pictograms on medication labels and other identifiers may prevent errors during medication handling and administration; this is an important avenue of investigation for future studies.
BACKGROUND: Medication preparation and administration are higher-risk steps in the medication management process. Therefore, medication management strategies, such as warnings and education about medication safety, are essential in preventing errors and improving the safe handling of medications by health care workers. OBJECTIVES: To validate comprehension of 9 pictograms designed to improve medication safety, and to assess long-term recall of these pictograms in a sample of pharmacy students. METHODS: First- and second-year pharmacy students were recruited as participants. The study was divided into 2 phases: comprehension (Phase 1) and long-term recall (Phase 2). In Phase 1, a slideshow of the 9 pictograms was presented to participants, who were asked to write the meaning of and required action for each pictogram. The intended meaning of each pictogram was then presented to the participants. Four weeks later, long-term recall was assessed in Phase 2 of the study using the same method. The meaning and required action that participants provided for each pictogram were reviewed by 3 independent raters. A pictogram was considered to be validated in the pharmacy student population if at least 67% of participants identified the correct meaning or required action during the recall phase. RESULTS: A total of 101 pharmacy students participated in Phase 1 and 67 in Phase 2. In Phase 1, 4 pictograms met the 67% threshold for comprehension. In Phase 2, after training, 7 of the 9 pictograms were validated. CONCLUSIONS: Given the results obtained with pharmacy students, redesign may be necessary for 2 of the pictograms. The use of validated medication safety pictograms on medication labels and other identifiers may prevent errors during medication handling and administration; this is an important avenue of investigation for future studies.
Authors: Kyle Wilby; Carlo A Marra; Jack H da Silva; Maja Grubisic; Stephanie Harvard; Larry D Lynd Journal: Ann Pharmacother Date: 2011-10-25 Impact factor: 3.154
Authors: Anita Krähenbühl-Melcher; Raymond Schlienger; Markus Lampert; Manuel Haschke; Jürgen Drewe; Stephan Krähenbühl Journal: Drug Saf Date: 2007 Impact factor: 5.606
Authors: Piotr Merks; Regis Vaillancourt; Damien Roux; Rafał Gierczyński; Grzegorz Juszczyk; Katarzyna Plagens-Rotman; Urszula Religioni; Jameason Cameron; Mike Zender Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2022-05-13 Impact factor: 2.908
Authors: Pilar Fuster-Linares; Cristina Alfonso-Arias; Alberto Gallart Fernández-Puebla; Encarna Rodríguez-Higueras; Silvia García-Mayor; Isabel Font-Jimenez; Mireia Llaurado-Serra Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-04-12 Impact factor: 4.614