Samuel Lapkin1, Tracy Levett-Jones2, Lynn Chenoweth3, Maree Johnson4,5. 1. Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, New South Wales, Australia. Samuel.lapkin@uts.edu.au. 2. School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia. 3. Centre for Healthy Brain Ageing, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia. 4. Faculty of Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University, North Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. 5. The Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, NSW, Australia.
Abstract
AIM: The aim of this overview was to examine the effectiveness of interventions designed to improve patient safety by reducing medication administration errors using data from systematic reviews. BACKGROUND: Medication administration errors remain unacceptably high despite the introduction of a range of interventions aimed at enhancing patient safety. Systematic reviews of strategies designed to improve medication safety report contradictory findings. A critical appraisal and synthesis of these findings are, therefore, warranted. METHODS: A comprehensive three-step search strategy was employed to search across 10 electronic databases. Two reviewers independently examined the methodological rigour and scientific quality of included systematic reviews using the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews protocol. RESULTS: Sixteen systematic reviews were eligible for inclusion. Evidence suggest that multifaceted approaches involving a combination education and risk management strategies and the use of bar code technology are effective in reducing medication errors. CONCLUSION: More research is needed to determine the benefits of routine double-checking of medications during administration by nurses, outcomes of self-administration of medications by capable patients, and associations between interruptions and medications errors. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: Medication-related incidents must be captured in a way that facilitates meaningful categorisation including contributing factors, potential and actual/risk of harm and contextual information on the incident.
AIM: The aim of this overview was to examine the effectiveness of interventions designed to improve patient safety by reducing medication administration errors using data from systematic reviews. BACKGROUND: Medication administration errors remain unacceptably high despite the introduction of a range of interventions aimed at enhancing patient safety. Systematic reviews of strategies designed to improve medication safety report contradictory findings. A critical appraisal and synthesis of these findings are, therefore, warranted. METHODS: A comprehensive three-step search strategy was employed to search across 10 electronic databases. Two reviewers independently examined the methodological rigour and scientific quality of included systematic reviews using the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews protocol. RESULTS: Sixteen systematic reviews were eligible for inclusion. Evidence suggest that multifaceted approaches involving a combination education and risk management strategies and the use of bar code technology are effective in reducing medication errors. CONCLUSION: More research is needed to determine the benefits of routine double-checking of medications during administration by nurses, outcomes of self-administration of medications by capable patients, and associations between interruptions and medications errors. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: Medication-related incidents must be captured in a way that facilitates meaningful categorisation including contributing factors, potential and actual/risk of harm and contextual information on the incident.
Authors: Peter J Gates; Melissa T Baysari; Madlen Gazarian; Magdalena Z Raban; Sophie Meyerson; Johanna I Westbrook Journal: Drug Saf Date: 2019-11 Impact factor: 5.606
Authors: Emanuele Di Simone; Noemi Giannetta; Flavia Auddino; Antonio Cicotto; Deborah Grilli; Marco Di Muzio Journal: Indian J Crit Care Med Date: 2018-05
Authors: Charlotte Arp Sørensen; Marianne Lisby; Charlotte Olesen; Ulrika Enemark; Signe Bredsgaard Sørensen; Annette de Thurah Journal: Ther Adv Drug Saf Date: 2020-05-04
Authors: Peter J Gates; Rae-Anne Hardie; Magdalena Z Raban; Ling Li; Johanna I Westbrook Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2021-01-15 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Clare L Tolley; Neil W Watson; Andrew Heed; Jochen Einbeck; Suzanne Medows; Linda Wood; Layla Campbell; Sarah P Slight Journal: BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Date: 2022-03-29 Impact factor: 2.796
Authors: Janique G Jessurun; Nicole G M Hunfeld; Joost van Rosmalen; Monique van Dijk; Patricia M L A van den Bemt Journal: Int J Clin Pharm Date: 2021-08-07