Literature DB >> 30185684

Outcome of vaginal birth after cesarean section: A retrospective comparative analysis of spontaneous versus induced labor in women with one previous cesarean section.

Rana Kiwan1, Nourah Al Qahtani1.   

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study is to compare the success rate of vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) in spontaneous and induced labor. Design: This is an 8-year retrospective comparative study. Setting: University hospital. Population: Five hundred and ninety-four women who had one previous lower segment cesarean delivery. Materials and
Methods: This is a retrospective study of all women, who had lower segment cesarean section, admitted for trial of labor between April 2010 and November 2016. Five hundred and sixty-seven women who elected to have trial of labor after one previous cesarean were included in the study, of these 477 (84.13%) had spontaneous onset of labor (control group) and 90 (15.87%) had induction of labor (IOL) (study group). Two hundred and seventy-seven women had no previous vaginal delivery, and 297 had one previous vaginal delivery.
Results: We compared the success rates of VBAC in women who had IOL with those who came with spontaneous labor. The rate of vaginal delivery after CS (VBAC) was 50.0% and 66.6% in the study and control groups, respectively. There was a significant increase in the rate of cesarean delivery due to fetal distress in the study group (P = 0.016). There were no cases of uterine rupture in the control group and one case in the study group. Patients who had spontaneous labor and at least one previous vaginal delivery have higher success rate of vaginal delivery.
Conclusion: Women with one previous CS, who undergo IOL, have lower success rates of vaginal delivery compared with those who presented in spontaneous labor. They also have higher risk of CS delivery due to fetal distress. Previous normal vaginal delivery increases the success rate of VBAC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Induction of labor; previous lower segment cesarean section; prostaglandin; vaginal birth after cesarean section

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30185684      PMCID: PMC6126055          DOI: 10.4103/aam.aam_54_17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Afr Med        ISSN: 0975-5764


  22 in total

1.  Attempted operative vaginal delivery vs repeat cesarean in the second stage among women undergoing a trial of labor after cesarean delivery.

Authors:  Moeun Son; Archana Roy; William A Grobman
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Impact of prolonged dinoprostone cervical ripening on the rate of artificial induction of labor: a prospective study of 330 patients.

Authors:  Christine Denoual-Ziad; Stéphanie Aicardi-Nicolas; Christian Creveuil; Cathy Gaillard; Michel Dreyfus; Guillaume Benoist
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Res       Date:  2014-10-20       Impact factor: 1.730

Review 3.  Prevalence, Indications, Risk Indicators, and Outcomes of Emergency Peripartum Hysterectomy Worldwide: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Thomas van den Akker; Carolien Brobbel; Olaf M Dekkers; Kitty W M Bloemenkamp
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Cesarean section trends in the Nordic Countries - a comparative analysis with the Robson classification.

Authors:  Aura Pyykönen; Mika Gissler; Ellen Løkkegaard; Thomas Bergholt; Steen C Rasmussen; Alexander Smárason; Ragnheiður I Bjarnadóttir; Birna B Másdóttir; Karin Källén; Kari Klungsoyr; Susanne Albrechtsen; Finn E Skjeldestad; Anna-Maija Tapper
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 3.636

5.  Maternal morbidity associated with multiple repeat cesarean deliveries.

Authors:  Robert M Silver; Mark B Landon; Dwight J Rouse; Kenneth J Leveno; Catherine Y Spong; Elizabeth A Thom; Atef H Moawad; Steve N Caritis; Margaret Harper; Ronald J Wapner; Yoram Sorokin; Menachem Miodovnik; Marshall Carpenter; Alan M Peaceman; Mary J O'Sullivan; Baha Sibai; Oded Langer; John M Thorp; Susan M Ramin; Brian M Mercer
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  The MFMU Cesarean Registry: impact of fetal size on trial of labor success for patients with previous cesarean for dystocia.

Authors:  Alan M Peaceman; Rebecca Gersnoviez; Mark B Landon; Catherine Y Spong; Kenneth J Leveno; Michael W Varner; Dwight J Rouse; Atef H Moawad; Steve N Caritis; Margaret Harper; Ronald J Wapner; Yoram Sorokin; Menachem Miodovnik; Marshall Carpenter; Mary J O'Sullivan; Baha M Sibai; Oded Langer; John M Thorp; Susan M Ramin; Brian M Mercer
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Do Women Have a Choice? Care Providers' and Decision Makers' Perspectives on Barriers to Access of Health Services for Birth after a Previous Cesarean.

Authors:  Sarah Munro; Jude Kornelsen; Kitty Corbett; Elizabeth Wilcox; Nick Bansback; Patricia Janssen
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 3.689

8.  The outcomes of trial of labour after cesarean section following induction of labour compared to spontaneous labour.

Authors:  Ghadeer Al-Shaikh; Hazem Al-Mandeel
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2013-01-11       Impact factor: 2.344

9.  Establishing a National Maternal Morbidity Outcome Indicator in England: A Population-Based Study Using Routine Hospital Data.

Authors:  Manisha Nair; Jennnifer J Kurinczuk; Marian Knight
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Cesarean delivery rates in Saudi Arabia: a ten-year review.

Authors:  Hassan S Ba'aqeel
Journal:  Ann Saudi Med       Date:  2009 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.526

View more
  5 in total

1.  The Mode of delivery of grand multiparous with post-cesarean single uterine scar in low resources settings: A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Mve Koh Valère; Belinga Etienne; Elong Phelix Adolphe; Toko Fokam Brice; Pierre Marie Tebeu
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X       Date:  2019-07-05

2.  Influence of the second stage of labor on maternal and neonatal outcomes in vaginal births after caesarean section: a multicenter study in Germany.

Authors:  G Gitas; L Proppe; A K Ertan; S Baum; A Rody; M Kocaer; K Dinas; L Allahqoli; A S Laganà; A Sotiriadis; S Sommer; I Alkatout
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 3.007

3.  Oxytocin use in trial of labor after cesarean and its relationship with risk of uterine rupture in women with one previous cesarean section: a meta-analysis of observational studies.

Authors:  Huan Zhang; Haiyan Liu; Shouling Luo; Weirong Gu
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 3.007

4.  Risk factor analysis in women who underwent trial of labor after cesarean section: a multicenter study in Germany

Authors:  George Gitas; Ibrahim Alkatout; Kubilay A Ertan; Achim Rody; Louisa Proppe; Mustafa Kocaer; Antonio Simone Laganà; Leila Allahqoli; Themistoklis Mikos; Soteris Sommer; Sascha Baum
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2022-07-05

5.  The Failure Rate, Related Factors, and Neonate Complications of Vaginal Delivery after Cesarean Section.

Authors:  Azadeh Asgarian; Nayereh Rahmati; Farzaneh Nasiri; Abolfazl Mohammadbeigi
Journal:  Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res       Date:  2019-12-27
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.