Literature DB >> 28153660

Attempted operative vaginal delivery vs repeat cesarean in the second stage among women undergoing a trial of labor after cesarean delivery.

Moeun Son1, Archana Roy2, William A Grobman3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It is not well-characterized whether attempting operative vaginal delivery is a safe and effective alternative among women who undergo a trial of labor after cesarean delivery who are unable to complete second-stage labor with a spontaneous vaginal delivery.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare maternal and neonatal outcomes that are associated with attempted operative vaginal delivery with those that are associated with second-stage repeat cesarean delivery without an operative vaginal delivery attempt among women who undergo a trial of labor after cesarean delivery. STUDY
DESIGN: This is a retrospective secondary analysis of data from Cesarean Registry of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Women who underwent a trial of labor after cesarean delivery who were at least 36 weeks gestation were eligible for analysis if they had a live, singleton, nonanomalous gestation in cephalic presentation and reached second-stage labor (defined as complete cervical dilation) with a fetal station of at least +2. The data for women who had an attempted operative vaginal delivery with either forceps or vacuum were compared with those of women who underwent second stage repeat cesarean delivery without operative vaginal delivery attempt. Outcomes of maternal and neonatal complications were compared between groups with bivariable and multivariable analyses.
RESULTS: Of 1230 women whose cases were eligible for analysis, 945 women (76.8%) had an attempted operative vaginal delivery. Of those who underwent attempted operative vaginal delivery, 914 women (96.7%) achieved a vaginal delivery. Women who attempted operative vaginal delivery had a lower mean body mass index (30.4±6.0 vs 31.8±5.9 kg/m2; P=.001) and gestational age (39.5±1.3 vs 39.8±1.2 weeks; P=.012) at delivery and were more likely to be of non-Hispanic black race (30.0% vs 22.1%; P=.002), to have had a previous vaginal delivery (34.9% vs 20.4%; P<.001), and to have fetal descent greater than +2 station at complete dilation (55.6% vs 16.8%; P<.001) and were less likely to have chorioamnionitis (6.8% vs 19.3%; P<.001). The frequency of endometritis was significantly lower among women who had an attempted operative vaginal delivery compared with those who had repeat cesarean delivery (2.5% vs 9.1%; P<.001). However, other serious maternal or neonatal adverse outcomes were not statistically different between the groups. These findings persisted after adjustment for potential confounders.
CONCLUSION: In the setting of a trial of labor after cesarean delivery in the second stage with a fetal station of at least +2, attempted operative vaginal delivery resulted in a vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in most women and was not associated with increased adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes but was associated with a reduced frequency of endometritis compared with repeat cesarean delivery without operative vaginal delivery attempt.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cesarean delivery; operative vaginal delivery; second stage labor; trial of labor after cesarean delivery

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28153660     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.01.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  4 in total

1.  Outcome of vaginal birth after cesarean section: A retrospective comparative analysis of spontaneous versus induced labor in women with one previous cesarean section.

Authors:  Rana Kiwan; Nourah Al Qahtani
Journal:  Ann Afr Med       Date:  2018 Jul-Sep

2.  Perinatal outcome after vacuum assisted delivery with digital feedback on traction force; a randomised controlled study.

Authors:  Stefhanie Romero; Kristina Pettersson; Khurram Yousaf; Magnus Westgren; Gunilla Ajne
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 3.007

3.  Correlation Between Previous Caesarean Section and Adverse Maternal Outcomes Accordingly With Robson Classification: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Shazia Jamshed; Shuo-Chen Chien; Afifa Tanweer; Rahma-Novita Asdary; Muhammad Hardhantyo; David Greenfield; Chia-Hui Chien; Shuen-Fu Weng; Wen-Shan Jian; Usman Iqbal
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-01-10

Review 4.  Still No Substantial Evidence to Use Prophylactic Antibiotic at Operative Vaginal Delivery: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Yifru Berhan; Sisay Kirba; Achamyelesh Gebre
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2020-05-19
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.