| Literature DB >> 30185189 |
Yuri Nakamura1, Laura Gaetano2,3, Takuya Matsushita1, Altermatt Anna2,4, Till Sprenger5, Ernst-Wilhelm Radue6, Jens Wuerfel2,4, Lorena Bauer2,7, Michael Amann2,3,8, Koji Shinoda1, Noriko Isobe9, Ryo Yamasaki1, Takahiko Saida10,11, Ludwig Kappos3, Jun-Ichi Kira12.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We compared the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features between Japanese and Caucasian patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), and identified the relationships between MRI features and disability.Entities:
Keywords: Brain lesions; Brain volume; Disability; Magnetic resonance imaging; Multiple sclerosis; Progression; Race
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30185189 PMCID: PMC6125988 DOI: 10.1186/s12974-018-1295-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Neuroinflammation ISSN: 1742-2094 Impact factor: 8.322
Comparison of baseline characteristics between Japanese and Caucasian patients with MS
| Entire study population | Population for T2W-lesion evaluation | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Japanese patients ( | Caucasian patients ( |
| Japanese patients ( | Caucasian patients ( |
| |
| Female (%) | 65 (68.4) | 179 (72.8) | 0.43 | 65 (69.9) | 48 (66.7) | 0.74 |
| Age at time of the MRI, yearsa | 34.2 ± 8.3 | 36.9 ± 9.5 | 0.03 | 34.0 ± 8.3 | 35.9 ± 9.8 | 0.24 |
| Age at first symptom, yearsa | 26.9 ± 8.9 | 29.0 ± 8.5 | 0.03 | 26.6 ± 8.7 | 28.3 ± 8.6 | 0.15 |
| Duration of disease from first symptom, yearsa | 7.4 ± 6.4 | 7.9 ± 7.2 | 0.60 | 7.4 ± 6.4 | 7.7 ± 8.1 | 0.75 |
| EDSS scoresa | 2.0 ± 1.7 | 2.3 ± 1.2 | 0.008 | 1.9 ± 1.7 | 2.2 ± 1.3 | 0.10 |
| MSSSa | 3.24 ± 2.61 | 3.84 ± 2.09 | 0.01 | 3.19 ± 2.60 | 3.78 ± 1.92 | 0.04 |
| Previous exposure of DMDs or immunosuppressive therapy, | 54 (56.8) | 70 (28.5) | < 0.0001 | 53 (57.0) | 22 (30.6) | 0.0009 |
| Patients with contrast-enhanced lesions, | 53 (55.8) | 126 (51.2) | 0.47 | 52 (55.9) | 40 (55.6) | 1.00 |
aValues are expressed as mean ± standard deviation
DMDs Disease modifying drugs, EDSS Kurtzke’s Expanded Disability Status Scale, MS multiple sclerosis, MSSS Multiple Sclerosis Severity Score, T2W T2-weighted
Comparison of baseline brain MRI features between Japanese and Caucasian patients with MS
| Mean | Median (IQR) | Mean | Median (IQR) |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Japanese patients ( | Caucasian patients ( | ||||
| Number of T2W-lesions | 62 | 50 (27–96) | 73 | 65 (24–108) | 0.08 |
| T2W-lesion volumes (cm3) | 11.5 | 7.8 (2.3–16.9) | 8.0 | 5.3 (2.4–12.2) | 0.12 |
| Each T2W-lesion volume (mm3) | 174 | 140 (78–224) | 118 | 85 (63–138) | < 0.0001 |
| Japanese patients ( | Caucasian patients ( | ||||
| NBV (cm3) | 942.6 | 954.1 (903.9–980.2) | 972.9 | 977.9 (940.4–1002.6) | < 0.0001 |
| Japanese patients ( | Caucasian patients (n = 148) | ||||
| NWMV (cm3) | 467.4 | 466.1 (446.5–486.1) | 486.9 | 487.7 (473.2–501.4) | < 0.0001 |
| Japanese patients ( | Caucasian patients ( | ||||
| NCGMV (cm3) | 441.3 | 438.3 (418.6–473.1) | 449.8 | 452.0 (429.9–471.7) | 0.08 |
| Japanese patients ( | Caucasian patients ( | ||||
| NDGMV (cm3) | 37.0 | 36.7 (33.3–40.6) | 40.8 | 41.4 (38.0–43.8) | < 0.0001 |
| Normalized thalamic volume (cm3) | 17.2 | 17.3 (15.7–19.0) | 18.8 | 18.9 (17.6–20.2) | < 0.0001 |
Statistical comparisons were performed using linear regression with adjustments for age, sex, duration of disease from the first symptom, and exposure to previous MS treatment. We calculated the average T2W-lesion volume by dividing overall T2W-lesion volume by the number of T2W-lesions in individual patients
IQR interquartile range, MRI Magnetic resonance imaging, MS multiple sclerosis, NBV normalized brain volume, NCGMV normalized cortical gray matter volume, NDGMV normalized deep gray matter volume, NWMV normalized white matter volume
Fig. 1Distribution of lesions between Japanese and Caucasian patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). The proportion of patients with lesions in each brain region is shown. The proportion of patients with lesions in the cerebellum and parietal lobe was significantly lower in the Japanese group (black bar) compared with the Caucasian group (gray bar). “Sub-lobar” includes the basal ganglia and surrounding white matter. *p < 0.05
Fig. 2Correlations of Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores with brain lesions or volume in patients with MS. Correlations of EDSS scores with T2W-lesion volumes (T2LV), normalized brain volume (NBV), normalized white matter volume (NWMV), normalized cortical gray matter volume (NCGMV), normalized thalamic volume, or normalized deep gray matter volume (NDGMV) in Japanese (a–f) and Caucasian patients (g–l). The lines represent the linear regression of the data. r = Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient
Fig. 3Relationship between disease duration and brain volumes in MS. Scatter plots show the relationship between disease duration and brain volumes (NBV, NCGMV, NDGMV, normalized thalamic volume, or NWMV; a–e) in Japanese (black dots) and Caucasian patients (gray dots). The solid lines represent the linear regression of the data. A test of homogeneity of slopes shows significant differences in NDGMV and normalized thalamic volume between the groups (p = 0.001 for both), and a statistically different trend in NBV between the groups (p = 0.06). A test of homogeneity of intercept demonstrated that NBV, NWMV, NDGMV, and normalized thalamic volume were consistently smaller in Japanese versus Caucasian patients throughout the entire disease duration examined (p = 0.046, p = 0.005, p = 0.01, and p = 0.04, respectively), while NCGMV was similar between the two racial groups in the early course of the disease. R2 = coefficient of determination
Fig. 4Relationship between disease duration and brain volumes in MS with a disease duration of < 10 years. Scatter plots show the relationship between disease duration and brain volumes (NBV, NCGMV, NDGMV, normalized thalamic volume, or NWMV; a–e) in Japanese (black dots) and Caucasian patients (gray dots). The solid lines represent the linear regression of the data. A test of homogeneity of slopes showed significant differences in NBV (p = 0.02), NDGMV (p = 0.0002), and normalized thalamic volume (p < 0.0001) between the two groups. R2 = coefficient of determination