Elizabeth Chuang1, Eric N Gil1, Qi Gao2, Benjamin Kligler3, M Diane McKee1. 1. Departments of Family and Social Medicine. 2. Epidemiology and Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York. 3. Department of Family Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The widespread use of opioid analgesics to treat chronic nonmalignant pain has contributed to the ongoing epidemic of opioid-related morbidity and mortality. Previous studies have also demonstrated a relationship between opioid analgesic use and unemployment due to disability. These studies have been limited to mainly white European and North American populations. The objective of this study is to explore the relationship between opioid analgesic use for chronic nonmalignant pain in an urban, mainly black and Hispanic, low-income population. DESIGN: This is a cross-sectional observational study. SETTING: Subjects were recruited from six urban primary care health centers. SUBJECTS: Adults with chronic neck, back, or osteoarthritis pain participating in an acupuncture trial were included. METHODS: Survey data were collected as a part of the Acupuncture Approaches to Decrease Disparities in Pain Treatment two-arm (AADDOPT-2) comparative effectiveness trial. Participants completed a baseline survey including employment status, opioid analgesic use, the Brief Pain Inventory, the global Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information Systems quality of life measure, the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), and demographic information. A multivariable logistic regression model was built to examine the association between opioid analgesic use and unemployment. RESULTS: Opioid analgesic use was associated with three times the odds of unemployment due to disability while controlling for potential confounders, including depression, pain severity, pain interference, global physical and mental functioning, and demographic characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: This study adds to the growing body of evidence that opioid analgesics should be used with caution in chronic nonmalignant pain.
OBJECTIVE: The widespread use of opioid analgesics to treat chronic nonmalignant pain has contributed to the ongoing epidemic of opioid-related morbidity and mortality. Previous studies have also demonstrated a relationship between opioid analgesic use and unemployment due to disability. These studies have been limited to mainly white European and North American populations. The objective of this study is to explore the relationship between opioid analgesic use for chronic nonmalignant pain in an urban, mainly black and Hispanic, low-income population. DESIGN: This is a cross-sectional observational study. SETTING: Subjects were recruited from six urban primary care health centers. SUBJECTS: Adults with chronic neck, back, or osteoarthritis pain participating in an acupuncture trial were included. METHODS: Survey data were collected as a part of the Acupuncture Approaches to Decrease Disparities in Pain Treatment two-arm (AADDOPT-2) comparative effectiveness trial. Participants completed a baseline survey including employment status, opioid analgesic use, the Brief Pain Inventory, the global Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information Systems quality of life measure, the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), and demographic information. A multivariable logistic regression model was built to examine the association between opioid analgesic use and unemployment. RESULTS: Opioid analgesic use was associated with three times the odds of unemployment due to disability while controlling for potential confounders, including depression, pain severity, pain interference, global physical and mental functioning, and demographic characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: This study adds to the growing body of evidence that opioid analgesics should be used with caution in chronic nonmalignant pain.
Authors: Sara E Heins; Mark J Sorbero; Christopher M Jones; Andrew W Dick; Bradley D Stein Journal: Subst Use Misuse Date: 2018-01-05 Impact factor: 2.164
Authors: Ian Chen; James Kurz; Mark Pasanen; Charles Faselis; Mukta Panda; Lisa J Staton; Jane O'Rorke; Madhusudan Menon; Inginia Genao; JoAnn Wood; Alex J Mechaber; Eric Rosenberg; Tim Carey; Diane Calleson; Sam Cykert Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2005-07 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Ellen Meara; Jill R Horwitz; Wilson Powell; Lynn McClelland; Weiping Zhou; A James O'Malley; Nancy E Morden Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2016-06-22 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Gary M Franklin; Bert D Stover; Judith A Turner; Deborah Fulton-Kehoe; Thomas M Wickizer Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2008-01-15 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Gery P Guy; Kun Zhang; Michele K Bohm; Jan Losby; Brian Lewis; Randall Young; Louise B Murphy; Deborah Dowell Journal: MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep Date: 2017-07-07 Impact factor: 17.586
Authors: Mardge H Cohen; Lorie Benning; Kathleen M Weber; Anjali Sharma; Michael Plankey; Mirjam-Colette Kempf; Tracey E Wilson; Brad Aouizerat; Joel Milam; Adaora A Adimora; Gina Wingood; Adam W Carrico Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2022-02-28 Impact factor: 3.017