| Literature DB >> 30183875 |
Caroline de Castro Moura1, Denise Hollanda Iunes2, Silvia Graciela Ruginsk3, Valéria Helena Salgado Souza4, Bianca Bacelar de Assis5, Erika de Cássia Lopes Chaves6.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: to assess the action of ear acupuncture on disability and tissue temperature in people with chronic pain in the spinal column.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30183875 PMCID: PMC6136555 DOI: 10.1590/1518-8345.2678.3050
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Rev Lat Am Enfermagem ISSN: 0104-1169
Figure 1Flowchart of the participants involved in the study. Alfenas, MG, Brazil, 2016
Characterization of the sample by age, sex, duration and causes of the pain. Alfenas, MG, Brazil, 2016 (n=110)
| Variables | Groups | P Value | |||
| Treatment (n=37) | Placebo (n=36) | Control (n=37) | |||
| Age (x*±sd†) | (years) | 47.5±13.9 | 51.0±14.9 | 46.2±15.7 | 0.272‡ |
| Sex (%§) | Male | 18.9 | 25.0 | 18.9 | 0.763|| |
| Female | 81.1 | 75.0 | 81.1 | ||
| Duration of pain (x*±sd†) | (months) | 47.5±13.9 | 51.0±14.9 | 46.2±15.7 | 0.850‡ |
| Causes of the pain (%§) | Postural changes | 16.2 | 44.4 | 16.2 | 0.057|| |
| Osteoarthritis | 35.1 | 41.6 | 16.2 | ||
*Mean; † Standard deviation; ‡Kruskal-Wallis test; §Percentage; ||Chi-squared test.
Intraclass and interclass analyses of disability, expressed in median, (mean ± standard deviation) and confidence interval at 95%, in the three groups and at three points. Alfenas, MG, Brazil, 2016 (n=110)
| Groups | Assessments | ||
| Initial | Final | Follow up | |
| Treatment (n=37) | 12.0*† (11.8±5.8) 9.8-13.7 | 4.0*‡ (6.6±6.3) 4.4-8.8 | 6.0† (7.5±6.7) 5.3-9.7 |
| Placebo (n=36) | 12.5*† (12.8±7.0) 10.4-15.2 | 8.0* (9.9±7.2) 7.5-12.4 | 9.5† (10.1±7.7) 7.4-12.7 |
| Control (n=37) | 11.0 (10.2±5.5) 8.4-12.1 | 11.0 (11.1±6.2) 9.0-13.1 | 11.0 (10.2±6.9) 8.6-13.2 |
*p < 0.05 between initial and final assessments (Wilcoxon); †p < 0.05 between initial and follow-up assessments (Wilcoxon); ‡p < 0.05 interclass analysis (Kruskal-Wallis, followed by Student-Newman Keuls).
Intraclass and interclass analyses of the mean tissue temperature of the dorsal region, expressed in median, (mean ± standard deviation) and confidence interval at 95%, in the three groups and at three points. Alfenas, MG, Brazil, 2016. (n=110)
| Groups | Assessments | ||
| Initial | Final | Follow up | |
| Treatment (n=37) | 30.4* (30.5±0.7) 30.2-30.7 | 30.2† (30.1±1.3) 29.6-30.5 | 30.9*† (30.8±0.3) 30.5-31.1 |
| Placebo (n=36) | 30.4 (30.4±0.9) 30.1-30.7 | 30.2† (30.1±1.2) 29.7-30.5 | 30.8† (30.6±0.8) 30.3-30.9 |
| Control (n=37) | 30.3* (30.1±1.0) 29.8-30.5 | 30.3 (30.2±1.3) 29.7-30.6 | 30.7* (30.5±1.3) 30.1-30.9 |
*p < 0.05 between initial and follow-up assessments (Wilcoxon); †p < 0.05 between final and follow-up assessments (Wilcoxon).