| Literature DB >> 30182453 |
Georgy A Filonenko1, Jody A M Lugger2, Chong Liu1, Ellen P A van Heeswijk3, Marco M R M Hendrix3, Manuela Weber4, Christian Müller4, Emiel J M Hensen3, Rint P Sijbesma2, Evgeny A Pidko1.
Abstract
Structural heterogeneity defines the properties of many functional polymers and it is often crucial for their performance and ability to withstand mechanical impact. Such heterogeneity, however, poses a tremendous challenge for characterization of these materials and limits our ability to design them rationally. Herein we present a practical methodology capable of resolving the complex mechanical behavior and tracking mechanical impact in discrete phases of segmented polyurethane-a typical example of a structurally complex polymer. Using direct optical imaging of photoluminescence produced by a small-molecule organometallic mechano-responsive sensor we observe in real time how polymer phases dissipate energy, restructure, and breakdown upon mechanical impact. Owing to its simplicity and robustness, this method has potential in describing the evolution of complex soft-matter systems for which global characterization techniques fall short of providing molecular-level insight.Entities:
Keywords: copper; luminescence; mechanical properties; molecular dynamics; polymers
Year: 2018 PMID: 30182453 PMCID: PMC6348422 DOI: 10.1002/anie.201809108
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl ISSN: 1433-7851 Impact factor: 15.336
Figure 1Structure and properties of PU phases (A), working principles of CuN mechanophores (B) and building blocks used in this work together with the solid‐state structure of reference complex 1 (C).
Figure 2Tensile test method, hard phase alignment characterization (top) and experimental data (bottom, (A)–(D)). Stress (black lines) in uniaxial tension at two different elongation rates and corresponding PL response curves (brown dots). Expansions show PL, stress and strain profiles for three loading steps in the vicinity of 100 MPa region (curves in stress–strain coordinates can be found in the Supporting Information).
Figure 3A) 2D SAXS data for top: isotropic and prestretched Cu‐HP40 samples and bottom: of Cu‐HP40‐5 subjected to slow elongation and Cu‐HP40‐50 subjected fast elongation. Measurements performed on samples recovered after tensile elongation tests depicted in Figure 2. B) Total scattering intensity and azimuthal intensity distribution plots for scattering data depicted in panel (A) and IR spectroscopy data for these samples. C) Proposed deformation mechanism of Cu‐HP40 at slow and fast elongation regimes assigned to observed PL profiles.