| Literature DB >> 30181550 |
Maryann Giel-Moloney1, Ana P Goncalvez1, John Catalan1, Valerie Lecouturier2, Yves Girerd-Chambaz2, Fernando Diaz1,3, Francisco Maldonado-Arocho1,4, Raul C Gomila1, Marie-Clotilde Bernard2, Ray Oomen1, Simon Delagrave1, Nicolas Burdin2, Harold Kleanthous1, Nicolas Jackson2, Jon Heinrichs5, Konstantin V Pugachev6.
Abstract
Zika virus (ZIKV) is an emerging mosquito-borne pathogen representing a global health concern. It has been linked to fetal microcephaly and other birth defects and neurological disorders in adults. Sanofi Pasteur has engaged in the development of an inactivated ZIKV vaccine, as well as a live chimeric vaccine candidate ChimeriVax-Zika (CYZ) that could become a preferred vaccine depending on future ZIKV epidemiology. This report focuses on the CYZ candidate that was constructed by replacing the pre-membrane and envelope (prM-E) genes in the genome of live attenuated yellow fever 17D vaccine virus (YF 17D) with those from ZIKV yielding a viable CYZ chimeric virus. The replication rate of CYZ in the Vero cell substrate was increased by using a hybrid YF 17D-ZIKV signal sequence for the prM protein. CYZ was highly attenuated both in mice and in human in vitro models (human neuroblastoma and neuronal progenitor cells), without the need for additional attenuating modifications. It exhibited significantly reduced viral loads in organs compared to a wild-type ZIKV and a complete lack of neuroinvasion following inoculation of immunodeficient A129 mice. A single dose of CYZ elicited high titers of ZIKV-specific neutralizing antibodies in both immunocompetent and A129 mice and protected animals from ZIKV challenge. The data indicate that CYZ is a promising vaccine candidate against ZIKV.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30181550 PMCID: PMC6123396 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-31375-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1CYZ-yfs and CYZ-hs (lead) candidates. (A) Predicted signalase cleavage scores by SignalP3.0 software for parental viruses, YF 17D and wt ZIKV, and the CYZ chimeras. ZIKV-specific residues are in bold. Several additional CYZ variants were constructed containing additional attenuating genetic modifications, such as CYZ-dC (3-amino acid deletion in C) and CYZ-dg (de-glycosylated E protein) variants based on CYZ-hs (see text for details). (B) Plaque morphologies of CY-yfs, CYZ-hs, and YF 17D parent virus in Vero cells. Plaques were stained with Crystal violet on day 5 post-infection. (C) Growth curves of CYZ-yfs and CYZ-hs viruses in serum-free Vero cell culture at indicated MOIs.
Figure 2Attenuation of CYZ-yfs and CYZ-hs variants in suckling mouse neurovirulence test compared to YF 17D vaccine benchmark control. 5-day old ICR suckling mice were inoculated IC with graded doses of viruses (the intended doses were −1 to 4 log10 PFU for CYZs and wt Puerto Rico-2015 ZIKV, 1 to 3 log10 PFU for ChimeriVax-JE, and −1 to 2 log10 PFU for YF 17D). The Mock control group was inoculated with diluent, MEM supplemented with FBS. Mortalities are shown at doses determined by back-titration of the inoculates. LD50 values of CYZs vs. YFV-17D were statistically different (P = 0.012; Mann Whitney test).
Immunogenicity of a single dose of CYZ variants and control viruses in immunocompetent ICR mice*.
| Immunogen | PRNT50 GMT ± SD against ZIKV Puerto Rico-2015 | PRNT50 GMT ± SD against ZIKV Uganda-1947 |
|---|---|---|
| CYZ-yfs | 1868 ± 1739 | 1282 ± 1165 |
| CYZ-hs | 7389 ± 8630 | 3774 ± 1796 |
| YF/Cambodia-2010 contr. | 2998 ± 1480 | 1562 ± 1040 |
| YF/Senegal-1984 contr. | 1421 ± 1352 | 2079 ± 1701 |
| wt ZIKV Mexico-2016 | 727 ± 1956 | 392 ± 531 |
| wt ZIKV Cambodia-2010 | 117 ± 55 | 329 ± 290 |
| wt ZIKV Senegal-1984 | 2558 ± 3980 | 2528 ± 1607 |
| wt ZIKV Uganda-1947 | 160 ± 435 | 1551 ± 722 |
| Mock (MEM) | <100 | <100 |
*PRNT50 titers were determined on Day 27 against wt ZIKV Puerto Rico-2015 and Uganda-1947 strains. The difference in titers against the two ZIKV strains was not statistically significant (P > 0.5; one-way ANOVA).
Figure 3CYZ-hs attenuation in A129 mice. (A,B) 3–4 Week old A129 mice were inoculated SC with 5 log10 PFU of CYZ-hs, ZIKV Puerto Rico-2015, YF 17D or Mock (MEM diluent), and body weight (A) and survival (B) were monitored. Differences between the ZIKV and all other groups were statistically significant, P = 0.0002 by Log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test. (C,D) 8-Week old A129 mice were inoculated SC with 5 log10 PFU of CYZ-hs or ZIKV Puerto Rico-2015 viruses, and viral RNA loads in indicated organs were determined by RT-qPCR on Days 5 (C) and 26 (D). Differences between CYZ-hs and ZIKV were statistically significant (P < 0.0001, two-way ANOVA).
ZIKV-specific neutralizing antibody responses in A129 mice*.
| Immunogen | PRNT50 GMT ± SD against ZIKV Puerto Rico-2015 | PRNT50 GMT ± SD against ZIKV Uganda-1947 |
|---|---|---|
| CYZ-hs | 2284 ± 885 | 2995 ± 2701 |
| CYZ-dC (3-a.a. deletion in C) | 480 ± 420 | 850 ± 227 |
| CYZ-dg (de-glycosylated E) | 353 ± 210 | 708 ± 281 |
| wt ZIKV Puerto Rico-2015 | 3900 ± 2573 | 3792 ± 9823 |
| Mock (MEM) | <20 | <20 |
*8-week old A129 mice were immunized SC with 5 log10 PFU of viruses and PRNT50 titers were determined in sera on Day 26 against wt ZIKV Puerto Rico-2015 and Uganda-1947 strains. The difference in titers against the two ZIKV strains was not statistically significant (P > 0.5; one-way ANOVA).
Figure 4Protection of CYZ-immunized A129 mice from ZIKV challenge. 8-week old A129 mice were immunized SC with 5 log10 PFU of CYZ variants and challenged on Day 31 by SC route with 3 log10 PFU of wt ZIKV Puerto Rico-2015. Post-challenge viral RNA in sera (viremia) was measured by RT-qPCR. For Mock vs. CYZ groups on Days 3–9, P = 0.0002; one-way ANOVA.
Figure 5Replication of CYZ-yfs and CYZ-hs variants, and wt ZIKV (Puerto Rico-2015 and Uganda-1947) and YF 17D controls in (A) human neuronal progenitor cells (hNPC) and (B) human neuroblastoma SK-N-SH cells. MOI 0.01 PFU/cell. Representative data from one of 2 independent experiments are shown.