Literature DB >> 30181267

Infrastructure to enable deployment of carbon capture, utilization, and storage in the United States.

Ryan W J Edwards1, Michael A Celia2.   

Abstract

In February 2018, the United States enacted significant financial incentives for carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) that will make capture from the lowest-capture-cost sources economically viable. The largest existing low-capture-cost opportunity is from ethanol fermentation at biorefineries in the Midwest. An impediment to deployment of carbon capture at ethanol biorefineries is that most are not close to enhanced oil recovery (EOR) fields or other suitable geological formations in which the carbon dioxide could be stored. Therefore, we analyze the viability of a pipeline network to transport carbon dioxide from Midwest ethanol biorefineries to the Permian Basin in Texas, which has the greatest current carbon dioxide demand for EOR and large potential for expansion. We estimate capture and transport costs and perform economic analysis for networks under three pipeline financing scenarios representing different combinations of commercial and government finance. Without government finance, we find that a network earning commercial rates of return would not be viable. With 50% government financing for pipelines, 19 million tons of carbon dioxide per year could be captured and transported profitably. Thirty million tons per year could be captured with full government pipeline financing, which would double global anthropogenic carbon capture and increase the United States' carbon dioxide EOR industry by 50%. Such a development would face challenges, including coordination between governments and industries, pressing timelines, and policy uncertainties, but is not unprecedented. This represents an opportunity to considerably increase CCUS in the near-term and develop long-term transport infrastructure facilitating future growth.

Entities:  

Keywords:  carbon capture, utilization, and storage; energy and climate policy; enhanced oil recovery; network economic analysis; pipeline infrastructure

Year:  2018        PMID: 30181267      PMCID: PMC6156648          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1806504115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  7 in total

1.  Use of U.S. croplands for biofuels increases greenhouse gases through emissions from land-use change.

Authors:  Timothy Searchinger; Ralph Heimlich; R A Houghton; Fengxia Dong; Amani Elobeid; Jacinto Fabiosa; Simla Tokgoz; Dermot Hayes; Tun-Hsiang Yu
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-02-07       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Energy. Beneficial biofuels--the food, energy, and environment trilemma.

Authors:  David Tilman; Robert Socolow; Jonathan A Foley; Jason Hill; Eric Larson; Lee Lynd; Stephen Pacala; John Reilly; Tim Searchinger; Chris Somerville; Robert Williams
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-07-17       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Evaluating the climate benefits of CO2-enhanced oil recovery using life cycle analysis.

Authors:  Gregory Cooney; James Littlefield; Joe Marriott; Timothy J Skone
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  Paris Agreement climate proposals need a boost to keep warming well below 2 °C.

Authors:  Joeri Rogelj; Michel den Elzen; Niklas Höhne; Taryn Fransen; Hanna Fekete; Harald Winkler; Roberto Schaeffer; Fu Sha; Keywan Riahi; Malte Meinshausen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Environmental, economic, and energetic costs and benefits of biodiesel and ethanol biofuels.

Authors:  Jason Hill; Erik Nelson; David Tilman; Stephen Polasky; Douglas Tiffany
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-07-12       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Geospatial analysis of near-term potential for carbon-negative bioenergy in the United States.

Authors:  Ejeong Baik; Daniel L Sanchez; Peter A Turner; Katharine J Mach; Christopher B Field; Sally M Benson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Near-term deployment of carbon capture and sequestration from biorefineries in the United States.

Authors:  Daniel L Sanchez; Nils Johnson; Sean T McCoy; Peter A Turner; Katharine J Mach
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 11.205

  7 in total
  3 in total

1.  Shale Gas Decarbonization in the Permian Basin: Is It Possible?

Authors:  Udayan Singh; Jennifer B Dunn
Journal:  ACS Eng Au       Date:  2022-04-06

2.  Environmental outcomes of the US Renewable Fuel Standard.

Authors:  Tyler J Lark; Nathan P Hendricks; Aaron Smith; Nicholas Pates; Seth A Spawn-Lee; Matthew Bougie; Eric G Booth; Christopher J Kucharik; Holly K Gibbs
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Fossil-Fuel Options for Power Sector Net-Zero Emissions with Sequestration Tax Credits.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Anderson; David C Rode; Haibo Zhai; Paul S Fischbeck
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 11.357

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.