Literature DB >> 30181243

Oncogenic RAS isoforms show a hierarchical requirement for the guanine nucleotide exchange factor SOS2 to mediate cell transformation.

Erin Sheffels1, Nancy E Sealover1, Chenyue Wang1, Do Hyung Kim1, Isabella A Vazirani1, Elizabeth Lee1, Elizabeth M Terrell2, Deborah K Morrison2, Ji Luo3, Robert L Kortum4.   

Abstract

About a third of tumors have activating mutations in HRAS, NRAS, or KRAS, genes encoding guanosine triphosphatases (GTPases) of the RAS family. In these tumors, wild-type RAS cooperates with mutant RAS to promote downstream effector activation and cell proliferation and transformation, suggesting that upstream activators of wild-type RAS are important modulators of mutant RAS-driven oncogenesis. The guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) SOS1 mediates KRAS-driven proliferation, but little is understood about the role of SOS2. We found that RAS family members have a hierarchical requirement for the expression and activity of SOS2 to drive cellular transformation. In mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs), SOS2 critically mediated mutant KRAS-driven, but not HRAS-driven, transformation. Sos2 deletion reduced epidermal growth factor (EGF)-dependent activation of wild-type HRAS and phosphorylation of the kinase AKT in cells expressing mutant RAS isoforms. Assays using pharmacological inhibitors revealed a hierarchical requirement for signaling by phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) in promoting RAS-driven cellular transformation that mirrored the requirement for SOS2. KRAS-driven transformation required the GEF activity of SOS2 and was restored in Sos2-/- MEFs by expression of constitutively activated PI3K. Finally, CRISPR/Cas9-mediated deletion of SOS2 reduced EGF-stimulated AKT phosphorylation and synergized with MEK inhibition to revert the transformed phenotype of human KRAS mutant pancreatic and lung tumor cells. These results indicate that SOS2-dependent PI3K signaling mediates mutant KRAS-driven transformation, revealing therapeutic targets in KRAS-driven cancers. Our data also reveal the importance of three-dimensional culture systems in investigating the mediators of mutant KRAS.
Copyright © 2018 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30181243      PMCID: PMC7396125          DOI: 10.1126/scisignal.aar8371

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Signal        ISSN: 1945-0877            Impact factor:   8.192


  73 in total

1.  Structural evidence for feedback activation by Ras.GTP of the Ras-specific nucleotide exchange factor SOS.

Authors:  S Mariana Margarit; Holger Sondermann; Brian E Hall; Bhushan Nagar; Andre Hoelz; Michelle Pirruccello; Dafna Bar-Sagi; John Kuriyan
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2003-03-07       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Multiple decisive phosphorylation sites for the negative feedback regulation of SOS1 via ERK.

Authors:  Yuji Kamioka; Shuhei Yasuda; Yoshihisa Fujita; Kazuhiro Aoki; Michiyuki Matsuda
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Regulation of ras signaling dynamics by Sos-mediated positive feedback.

Authors:  Sean Boykevisch; Chen Zhao; Holger Sondermann; Polyxeni Philippidou; Simon Halegoua; John Kuriyan; Dafna Bar-Sagi
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2006-11-07       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  A functional switch from lung cancer resistance to susceptibility at the Pas1 locus in Kras2LA2 mice.

Authors:  Minh D To; Jesus Perez-Losada; Jian-Hua Mao; Jeff Hsu; Tyler Jacks; Allan Balmain
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2006-07-02       Impact factor: 38.330

5.  Fibroblast immortality is a prerequisite for transformation by EJ c-Ha-ras oncogene.

Authors:  R F Newbold; R W Overell
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1983 Aug 18-24       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Synthetic lethal interaction between oncogenic KRAS dependency and STK33 suppression in human cancer cells.

Authors:  Claudia Scholl; Stefan Fröhling; Ian F Dunn; Anna C Schinzel; David A Barbie; So Young Kim; Serena J Silver; Pablo Tamayo; Raymond C Wadlow; Sridhar Ramaswamy; Konstanze Döhner; Lars Bullinger; Peter Sandy; Jesse S Boehm; David E Root; Tyler Jacks; William C Hahn; D Gary Gilliland
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  Oncogenic Ha-Ras-dependent mitogen-activated protein kinase activity requires signaling through the epidermal growth factor receptor.

Authors:  M Hamilton; A Wolfman
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1998-10-23       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Improved vectors and genome-wide libraries for CRISPR screening.

Authors:  Neville E Sanjana; Ophir Shalem; Feng Zhang
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 28.547

9.  Digital signaling and hysteresis characterize ras activation in lymphoid cells.

Authors:  Jayajit Das; Mary Ho; Julie Zikherman; Christopher Govern; Ming Yang; Arthur Weiss; Arup K Chakraborty; Jeroen P Roose
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2009-01-23       Impact factor: 41.582

10.  Differential interactions of human Sos1 and Sos2 with Grb2.

Authors:  S S Yang; L Van Aelst; D Bar-Sagi
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1995-08-04       Impact factor: 5.157

View more
  7 in total

1.  Plasma miR-193b-3p Is Elevated in Type 2 Diabetes and Could Impair Glucose Metabolism.

Authors:  Hua Hu; Meng Zhao; Zhaoyang Li; Hongli Nie; Jia He; Zhuo Chen; Jing Yuan; Huan Guo; Xiaomin Zhang; Handong Yang; Tangchun Wu; Meian He
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 6.055

2.  Anchorage-independent growth conditions reveal a differential SOS2 dependence for transformation and survival in RAS-mutant cancer cells.

Authors:  Erin Sheffels; Nancy E Sealover; Patricia L Theard; Robert L Kortum
Journal:  Small GTPases       Date:  2019-05-07

Review 3.  The Role of Wild-Type RAS in Oncogenic RAS Transformation.

Authors:  Erin Sheffels; Robert L Kortum
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 4.096

4.  Functional Specificity of the Members of the Sos Family of Ras-GEF Activators: Novel Role of Sos2 in Control of Epidermal Stem Cell Homeostasis.

Authors:  Fernando C Baltanás; Cynthia Mucientes-Valdivieso; L Francisco Lorenzo-Martín; Natalia Fernández-Parejo; Rósula García-Navas; Carmen Segrelles; Nuria Calzada; Rocío Fuentes-Mateos; Jesús M Paramio; Xosé R Bustelo; Eugenio Santos
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 6.639

5.  Analysis of the genomic landscape of yolk sac tumors reveals mechanisms of evolution and chemoresistance.

Authors:  Xuan Zong; Ying Zhang; Xinxin Peng; Dongyan Cao; Mei Yu; Jinhui Wang; Hongyue Li; Xuejiao Guo; Han Liang; Jiaxin Yang
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 14.919

6.  Marked synergy by vertical inhibition of EGFR signaling in NSCLC spheroids shows SOS1 is a therapeutic target in EGFR-mutated cancer.

Authors:  Patricia L Theard; Erin Sheffels; Nancy E Sealover; Amanda J Linke; David J Pratico; Robert L Kortum
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-09-08       Impact factor: 8.140

7.  Sulfarotene, a synthetic retinoid, overcomes stemness and sorafenib resistance of hepatocellular carcinoma via suppressing SOS2-RAS pathway.

Authors:  Feng Qi; Wenxing Qin; Yao Zhang; Yongde Luo; Bing Niu; Quanlin An; Biwei Yang; Keqing Shi; Zhijie Yu; Junwei Chen; Xin Cao; Jinglin Xia
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2021-09-04
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.