| Literature DB >> 35712251 |
Hua Hu1, Meng Zhao1, Zhaoyang Li1, Hongli Nie1, Jia He1, Zhuo Chen1, Jing Yuan1, Huan Guo1, Xiaomin Zhang1, Handong Yang2, Tangchun Wu1, Meian He1.
Abstract
Objective: To explore differentially expressed miRNAs in type 2 diabetes and their potential cellular functions.Entities:
Keywords: case-control study; glucose metabolism; microRNA; proteomics; type 2 diabetes
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35712251 PMCID: PMC9197112 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2022.814347
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) ISSN: 1664-2392 Impact factor: 6.055
Characteristics of the participants.
| Variables | DM cases (n=113) | Controls (n=113) |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Male, n (%) | 53 (46.9) | 53 (46.9) | 1.0 |
| Age, years | 61.1 (7.1) | 61.1 (7.1) | 0.948 |
| Smoking, n (%) | |||
| Never | 79 (70.5) | 77 (68.1) | 0.814 |
| Current | 21 (18.8) | 25 (22.1) | |
| Ever | 12 (10.7) | 11 (9.7) | |
| Drinking, n (%) | |||
| Never | 80 (71.4) | 73 (65.2) | 0.525 |
| Current | 27 (24.1) | 31 (27.7) | |
| Ever | 5 (4.5) | 8 (7.1) | |
| Physical activity, n (%) | 102 (91.1) | 100 (88.5) | 1.0 |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 25.3 (3.4) | 22.9 (3.0) | <0.001 |
| WHR | 0.89 (0.06) | 0.86 (0.06) | 0.001 |
| FPG, mmol/L | 8.9 (2.4) | 5 (0.4) | <0.001 |
| HbA1c, % | 6.5 (1.5) | 5.3 (0.3) | <0.001 |
| TG, mmol/L | 2 (3.2) | 1.3 (0.8) | 0.022 |
| LDLC, mmol/L | 2.5 (0.9) | 2.8 (0.8) | 0.005 |
| HDLC, mmol/L | 1.5 (0.5) | 1.6 (0.4) | 0.477 |
| TC, mmol/L | 4.8 (1.5) | 4.8 (1.1) | 0.964 |
| SBP, mmHg | 137.7 (22.6) | 135.8 (22.4) | 0.522 |
| DBP, mmHg | 80.0 (13.1) | 80.0 (13.0) | 0.364 |
| Neutrophil, 109/L | 3.7 (1.4) | 3.3 (1.2) | 0.058 |
| Lymphocyte, 109/L | 2 (0.8) | 1.7 (0.5) | 0.003 |
| Monocyte, 109/L | 0.4 (0.2) | 0.3 (0.2) | 0.046 |
| Eosnophils, 109/L | 0.2 (0.2) | 0.1 (0.1) | 0.014 |
| Basophil, 109/L | 0.2 (0.2) | 0.1 (0.2) | 0.297 |
| WBC, 109/L | 6 (1.8) | 5.4 (1.4) | 0.008 |
| RBC, 1012/L | 4.5 (0.4) | 4.5 (0.5) | 0.205 |
| PLT, 109/L | 183.3 (54.8) | 196.9 (51.4) | 0.056 |
| Family history of diabetes, n (%) | 9 (8.2) | 8 (7.1) | 0.685 |
WHR, waist-to-hip ratio.
Figure 1Study design for the plasma miRNA profile in type 2 diabetes cases and controls. PCR, polymerase chain reaction.
Figure 2Results of miRNAs and protein screening and validation. (A) shows the results of cluster analysis of differently expressed miRNAs. Sample numbers with the test suffix are type 2 diabetes cases (like B01881P_test). Sample numbers with the control suffix are healthy controls (like B01675P_control). (B) shows the results of cluster analysis of differently expressed proteins. C1-C5: type 2 diabetes cases, D1-D5: healthy controls. (C) The volcano plot of miRNAs in array screening. (D) The volcano plot of proteins. (E. a) Differential expression of miRNA in plasma screened by miRNA microarray chip. (E. b) Differential expression of miRNA in plasma validated by Taqman PCR. (F. a) The different expression of 4 plasma proteins in preliminary screening group. (F. b) The different expression of 4 plasma proteins in validation group. (The figures were created by graphPad and R Statistical Software).
Differently expressed miRNAs selected to validation.
| miRNAs | Fold change | P value | FDR | CV | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Controls | Diabetes | ||||
| miR-3591-5p | 0.17 | 5.99E-07 | 4.22E-05 | 0.5 | 0.28 |
| miR-122-3p | 0.32 | 2.66E-06 | 1.00E-04 | 0.43 | 0.38 |
| miR-193b-3p | 2.02 | 2.45E-07 | 2.02E-05 | 0.48 | 0.16 |
| miR-26b-3p | 2.11 | 1.00E-04 | 2.00E-03 | 0.58 | 0.37 |
| miR-300 | 2.44 | 5.06E-10 | 1.56E-07 | 0.52 | 0.12 |
| miR-217 | 2.52 | 7.96E-07 | 5.30E-05 | 0.43 | 0.3 |
| miR-3926 | 2.66 | 1.46E-11 | 1.38E-08 | 0.43 | 0.15 |
| miR-641 | 2.68 | 1.31E-07 | 1.13E-05 | 0.51 | 0.28 |
| miR-593-5p | 3.13 | 1.04E-07 | 1.03E-05 | 0.61 | 0.27 |
| miR-105-5p | 3.22 | 3.52E-08 | 5.40E-06 | 0.65 | 0.28 |
| miR-4739 | 3.45 | 1.59E-09 | 3.84E-07 | 0.65 | 0.25 |
| miR-197-5p | 3.53 | 1.35E-09 | 3.51E-07 | 0.28 | 0.27 |
CV, coefficient of variance, FDR, False Discovery Rate, FDR is calculated from Benjamini Hochberg FDR.
Association of 4 miRNAs with T2D risk in validation population.
| Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95%CI) |
| OR (95%CI) |
| OR (95%CI) |
| |
| miR-193b-3p | 2.11 (1.02,4.37) | 0.046 | 2.28 (1.05,4.91) | 0.036 | 2.25 (1.05,4.84) | 0.038 |
| miR-4739 | 1.00 (0.70,1.44) | 0.991 | 1.01 (0.70,1.44) | 0.975 | 1.05 (0.73,1.52) | 0.793 |
| miR-26b-3p | 0.80 (0.58,1.12) | 0.194 | 0.81 (0.57,1.15) | 0.237 | 0.87 (0.59,1.28) | 0.471 |
| miR-197-5p | 0.92 (0.66,1.27) | 0.602 | 0.94 (0.67,1.30) | 0.689 | 0.96 (0.68,1.35) | 0.824 |
Model 1: adjusted for sex, age, BMI, smoking status, drinking status, physical activities and family history of diabetes.
Model 2: adjusted for variables in model 1 and TC (total cholesterol) and SBP (systolic pressure).
Model 3: adjusted for variables in model 2 and WBC (white blood cell count), RBC (red blood cell count) and PLT count.
Pearson correlation coefficients of plasma miRNAs correlation to clinical biochemical measurements and blood cell counts was analyzed in healthy participants (n=49).
| miR-193b-3p | miR-4739 | miR-26b-3p | miR-197-5p | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| SBP | 0.101 | 0.065 | 0.250** | 0.207** |
| DBP | 0.083 | -0.034 | 0.141 | 0.049 |
| TG | 0.283** | -0.021 | 0.126 | 0.12 |
| LDLC | 0.008 | -0.005 | 0.228** | -0.035 |
| HDLC | -0.118 | -0.003 | -0.101 | -0.004 |
| CHOL | 0.185* | -0.033 | 0.177* | -0.03 |
| FPG | 0.274** | 0.009 | -0.133 | -0.098 |
| HbA1c | 0.237** | -0.033 | 0.218* | -0.032 |
|
| ||||
| Neutrophil | 0.023 | -0.088 | 0.254** | 0.019 |
| Lymphocyte | 0.277** | 0.067 | 0.11 | 0.045 |
| Monocyte | 0.105 | 0.004 | 0.031 | 0.114 |
| Eosnophils | -0.054 | 0.021 | 0.047 | 0.075 |
| Basophil | -0.045 | -0.042 | -0.036 | -0.029 |
| RBC | 0.012 | -0.048 | 0.161* | 0.057 |
| PLT | -0.011 | 0.011 | 0.297** | 0.036 |
* indicates correlations statistically significant: *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01.
Differentially Expressed Proteins Identified by iTRAQ Analysis.
| Accession | Description | Peptides Coverage | Case vs. Control | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fold change |
| |||
| Q4LDE5 | Sushi, von Willebrand factor type A, EGF and pentraxin domain-containing protein 1(SVEP1) | 0.31 | 1.41 | 0.004 |
| P60174 | Triosephosphate isomerase 1 (TPI1) | 61.85 | 0.83 | 0.001 |
| P07737 | Profilin-1 (PFN1) | 73.57 | 0.82 | 0.015 |
| Q9Y490 | Talin-1 (TLN1) | 53.56 | 0.81 | 0.016 |
| Q7Z7M0 | Multiple epidermal growth factor-like domains protein 8 (MEGF8) | 6.12 | 0.8 | 0.001 |
| Q14019 | Coactosin-like protein (COTL1) | 51.41 | 0.73 | 0.018 |
| O15511 | Actin-related protein 2/3 complex subunit 5 (ARPC5) | 38.41 | 0.71 | 0.016 |
Accession was the number of proteins in Uniprot database.Peptides coverage: The number of amino acids in the peptide detected by mass spectrometry accounted for a proportion of the total number of amino acids in the protein.
Differentially Expressed Proteins Identified by iTRAQ Analysis.
| Accession | Description | Peptides Coverage | Case vs. Control | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fold change |
| |||
| Q4LDE5 | Sushi, von Willebrand factor type A, EGF and pentraxin domain-containing protein 1(SVEP1) | 0.31 | 1.41 | 0.004 |
| P60174 | Triosephosphate isomerase 1 (TPI1) | 61.85 | 0.83 | 0.001 |
| P07737 | Profilin-1 (PFN1) | 73.57 | 0.82 | 0.015 |
| Q9Y490 | Talin-1 (TLN1) | 53.56 | 0.81 | 0.016 |
| Q7Z7M0 | Multiple epidermal growth factor-like domains protein 8 (MEGF8) | 6.12 | 0.8 | 0.001 |
| Q14019 | Coactosin-like protein (COTL1) | 51.41 | 0.73 | 0.018 |
| O15511 | Actin-related protein 2/3 complex subunit 5 (ARPC5) | 38.41 | 0.71 | 0.016 |
Accession was the number of proteins in Uniprot database.Peptides coverage: The number of amino acids in the peptide detected by mass spectrometry accounted for a proportion of the total number of amino acids in the protein.
Q1/Q3 transitions of 4 target proteins selected for the MRM experiments.
| Accession | Protein Name | Peptide Sequence | Q1/Q3 (m/z) | DP | CE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P00722 | β-galactosidase | GDFQFNISR | 542.3/489.3 | 70.6 | 28.4 |
| 542.3/636.3 | 70.6 | 28.4 | |||
| VDEDQPFPAVPK | 671.3/587.2 | 80.1 | 33 | ||
| 671.3/755.4 | 80.1 | 33 | |||
| P07737 | Profilin-1 | DSPSVWAAVPGK | 607.3/913.4 | 75.4 | 30.7 |
| 607.3/301.2 | 75.4 | 30.7 | |||
| TFVNITPAEVGVLVGK | 822.5/968.6 | 91.1 | 38.5 | ||
| 822.5/1069.6 | 91.1 | 38.5 | |||
| P60174 | Triosephosphate isomerase | SNVSDAVAQSTR | 617.8/562.3 | 76.2 | 31.1 |
| 617.8/934.5 | 76.2 | 31.1 | |||
| VVLAYEPVWAIGTGK | 801.9/1057.6 | 89.6 | 37.7 | ||
| 801.9/928.5 | 89.6 | 37.7 | |||
| Q14019 | Coactosin-like protein | EVVQNFAK | 312.2/130 | 53.9 | 14.6 |
| 312.2/147.1 | 53.9 | 14.6 | |||
| FALITWIGENVSGLQR | 902.5/473.3 | 96.9 | 41.3 | ||
| 902.5/959.5 | 96.9 | 41.3 | |||
| Q9Y490 | Talin-1 | AVASAAAALVLK | 542.8/914.6 | 70.7 | 28.4 |
| 542.8/685.5 | 70.7 | 28.4 | |||
| 362.2/147.1 | 57.5 | 17.3 | |||
| 362.2/260.2 | 57.5 | 17.3 | |||
| GLAGAVSELLR | 543.3/617.4 | 70.7 | 28.4 | ||
| 543.3/716.4 | 70.7 | 28.4 |
Accession was the number of proteins in Uniprot database, Q1: parent ion, Q2: transition; DP=Declustering Pressure; CE=Collision Pressure.
Figure 3Differences of plasma miR-193b-3p and proteins between healthy controls and type 2 diabetes cases in groups according to gender. (The figures were created by graphPad).
Figure 4Effects of miR-193b-3p on glucose metabolism in HepG2 cells. Mimic: HepG2 cells transfected with miR-193b-3p mimic; mimic_NC: cells transfected with negative control of mimic; inhibitor: cells transfected with miR-193b-3p inhibitor; inhibitor_NC: cells transfected with negative control of inhibitor. (A) The expression level of miR-193b-3p after transfection; (B) Representative Western blot of TPI1 and β-actin after transfection. (C) The mRNA expression level of YWHAZ. (D) The level of extracellular glucose after transfection. (E) Representative Western blot of KRAS, SOS2, YWHAZ, FOXO1, PCK1, G6PC, and Tublin after transfection. (F) Representative Western blot of GLUT2, IR, GSK3A, GYS2, and β-actin after transfection. The bar graphs of figure (B), (E) and (F) showed the fold change of protein levels (cells transfected with mimic negative control as reference group) quantified by Image Pro Plus, # indicates P <0.01 for protein level in mimic group compared with all the other groups. (The figures were created by graphPad).