Brett Burstein1,2, Julia E M Upton2,3, Heloisa Fuzaro Terra2,4, Mark I Neuman5. 1. Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Montreal Children's Hospital, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada; brett.burstein@mail.mcgill.ca. 2. Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts. 3. Division of Immunology and Allergy, Department of Pediatrics, University of Toronto and The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada. 4. School of Dentistry, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia; and. 5. Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Harvard University and Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: International efforts have been focused on identifying children at low risk of clinically important traumatic brain injury in whom computed tomography (CT) neuroimaging can be avoided. We sought to determine if CT use for pediatric head trauma has decreased among US emergency departments (EDs). METHODS: This was a cross-sectional analysis of the National Hospital Ambulatory Care Medical Survey database of nationally representative ED visits from 2007 to 2015. We included children <18 years of age evaluated in the ED for head injury. Survey weighting procedures were used to estimate the annual proportion of children who underwent CT neuroimaging and to perform multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: There were an estimated 14.3 million pediatric head trauma visits during the 9-year study period. Overall, 32% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 29%-35%) of children underwent CT neuroimaging with no significant annual linear trend (P trend = .50). Multivariate analysis similarly revealed no difference by year (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.02; 95% CI: 0.97-1.07) after adjustment for patient- and ED-level covariates. CT use was associated with age ≥2 years (aOR: 1.51; 95% CI: 1.13-2.01), white race (aOR: 1.43; 95% CI: 1.10-1.86), highest triage acuity (aOR: 8.24 [95% CI: 4.00-16.95]; P < .001), and presentation to a nonteaching (aOR: 1.47; 95% CI: 1.05-2.06) or nonpediatric (aOR: 1.53; 95% CI: 1.05-2.23) hospital. CONCLUSIONS: CT neuroimaging did not decrease from 2007 to 2015. Findings suggest an important need for quality improvement initiatives to decrease CT use among children with head injuries.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: International efforts have been focused on identifying children at low risk of clinically important traumatic brain injury in whom computed tomography (CT) neuroimaging can be avoided. We sought to determine if CT use for pediatric head trauma has decreased among US emergency departments (EDs). METHODS: This was a cross-sectional analysis of the National Hospital Ambulatory Care Medical Survey database of nationally representative ED visits from 2007 to 2015. We included children <18 years of age evaluated in the ED for head injury. Survey weighting procedures were used to estimate the annual proportion of children who underwent CT neuroimaging and to perform multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: There were an estimated 14.3 million pediatric head trauma visits during the 9-year study period. Overall, 32% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 29%-35%) of children underwent CT neuroimaging with no significant annual linear trend (P trend = .50). Multivariate analysis similarly revealed no difference by year (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.02; 95% CI: 0.97-1.07) after adjustment for patient- and ED-level covariates. CT use was associated with age ≥2 years (aOR: 1.51; 95% CI: 1.13-2.01), white race (aOR: 1.43; 95% CI: 1.10-1.86), highest triage acuity (aOR: 8.24 [95% CI: 4.00-16.95]; P < .001), and presentation to a nonteaching (aOR: 1.47; 95% CI: 1.05-2.06) or nonpediatric (aOR: 1.53; 95% CI: 1.05-2.23) hospital. CONCLUSIONS: CT neuroimaging did not decrease from 2007 to 2015. Findings suggest an important need for quality improvement initiatives to decrease CT use among children with head injuries.
Authors: Parna Eshraghi Boroojeni; Yasheng Chen; Paul K Commean; Cihat Eldeniz; Gary B Skolnick; Corinne Merrill; Kamlesh B Patel; Hongyu An Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2022-06-17 Impact factor: 3.737
Authors: Jeffrey Paul Louie; Joseph Alfano; Thuy Nguyen-Tran; Hai Nguyen-Tran; Ryan Shanley; Tara Holm; Ronald A Furnival Journal: BMJ Qual Saf Date: 2020-02-28 Impact factor: 7.035
Authors: Alla Smith; Karen Gruskin; Michael C Monuteaux; Anne M Stack; Melissa Sundberg; Ramy Yim; Annie Seneski; Theresa Becker Journal: Pediatr Qual Saf Date: 2019-03-20
Authors: Jae Won Choi; Yeon Jin Cho; Ji Young Ha; Yun Young Lee; Seok Young Koh; June Young Seo; Young Hun Choi; Jung-Eun Cheon; Ji Hoon Phi; Injoon Kim; Jaekwang Yang; Woo Sun Kim Journal: Korean J Radiol Date: 2022-01-04 Impact factor: 3.500
Authors: Alina K Fong; Mark D Allen; Dana Waltzman; Kelly Sarmiento; Keith Owen Yeates; Stacy Suskauer; Max Wintermark; Daniel M Lindberg; David F Tate; Elizabeth A Wilde; Jaycie L Loewen Journal: J Neurotrauma Date: 2020-10-21 Impact factor: 5.269