| Literature DB >> 30175265 |
Rima R Sahay1, Pragya D Yadav1, Triparna Majumdar1, Swapnil Patil1, Prasad Sarkale1, Anita M Shete1, Gouri Chaubal1, Vinay R Dange2, Savita Patil1, Dimpal A Nyayanit1, Jayanthi Shastri2, Devendra T Mourya1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Varicella Zoster Virus (VZV) is consistently in circulation and shows an increase in disease burden during the spring season. Due to a wide range of clinical presentation from a vesicular rash to bleeding or neurological complications, it makes the clinical diagnosis difficult. The present study aims to understand whether the same strain of virus is responsible for the increase in the seasonal outbreaks occurring in different parts of the country with reference to the samples from Maharashtra, Rajasthan and Gujarat states of India.Entities:
Keywords: Epidemiology; Infectious disease; Public health; virology
Year: 2018 PMID: 30175265 PMCID: PMC6118100 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00757
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heliyon ISSN: 2405-8440
List of primers used for amplification and sequencing.
| Region | Primer Name and sequence | Primer Position | Product Size | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VZV-54BgII_F; 5′CGTAATGCATAACAGGCCAACAC3′ | 95005–95027 | 496bp | ||
| VZV-54BgII_R; 5′GAAACCTGGCGTCAAACATTACA3′ | 95501–95479 | |||
| ORF 22 (Region containing 4 SNP sites) | VZV_p22R1_F; 5′GGG TTT TGT ATG AGC GTT GG3′ | 37837–37856 | 546bp | |
| VZV_p22R1_R; 5′CCC CCG AGG TTC GTA ATA TC3′ | 38383–38356 | |||
| VZV_ORF38_F; 5′AATGGTCCGTATTAAATCTTGAGCAAC3′ | 69121–69148 | 550bp | ||
| VZV_ORF38_R; 5′CAAGTATAATTGTTAGTCGGCGCG3′ | 69648–69671 | |||
| ORF 63 | VZV_ORF63_F; 5′GCCGCTAGCCATATGATGTTTTGCACCTCACCGGCTA3′ | 110703–110724 | 960bp | Primers designed during this study |
| VZV_ORF63_R; 5′GCCGGATCCCTACACGCCATCGGGGGGGCGGTATAT3′ | 115539–111514 | |||
| Glycoprotein B | VZV_gB_F1; 5′ATGTCCCCTTGTGGCTATTATT CAAAG3′ | 56819–56845 | 2772bp | |
| VZV_gB_R1; 5′TTACACCCCCGTTA CATTCTCGGT3′ | 59614–59591 | |||
| VZV_gB_IntR2; 5′GAAACGGGAATTGGTACCCT ATCC3′ | 57420–57397 | Sequencing Primers | ||
| VZV_gB_IntF2; 5′GATGTTATCGTTAGCA CGGCGTGG3′ | 57335–57358 | |||
| VZV_gB_IntR3; 5′CAACCTCACGCCACTTGACA AGC3′ | 57950–57927 | |||
| VZV_gB_InfF3; 5′AGTCACGCCTCAT TTAACGGTTGG3′ | 57868–57890 | |||
| VZV_gB_IntR4; 5′TAACGTCGCCGAG AATACGAGC3′ | 58553–58532 | |||
| VZV_gB_IntF4; 5′GCGGACTATTTCCAATTAACCCA3′ | 58470–58492 | |||
| VZV_gB_InfR5; 5′GTGGTAAATCCGTGTACGGT GG3′ | 59160–59139 | |||
| VZV_gB_IntF5; 5′CGTTGGACATGTGGTTCTTGG3′ | 590090–59118 |
Fig. 1Typical vesicular lesion of varicella seen among patients.
Clinico-epidemiological profile of VZV cases investigated from Mumbai, Maharashtra, India (n = 50).
| Clinical Profile (n = 50) | N | Percentage (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Vesicular Rash | 50 | 100 |
| Fever | 44 | 88 |
| Cough | 18 | 36 |
| Headache | 26 | 52 |
| Bodyache | 29 | 58 |
| Nausea | 11 | 22 |
| Vomiting | 2 | 4 |
| Pain in abdomen | 2 | 4 |
| <18 years | 4 | 8 % |
| 18–25 years | 34 | 68 % |
| 26–35 years | 9 | 18 % |
| >35 years | 3 | 6 % |
| Alcohol | 5 | 10 % |
| Tobacco chewing | 22 | 44 % |
| Smoking | 1 | 2 % |
| Others | 0 | 0 |
| No addiction | 21 | 42 % |
| Yes | 41 | 82 % |
| No | 9 | 18 % |
| Jari workers | 44 | 88 % |
| Labors in gold shop | 4 | 8 % |
| Labors at construction sites | 1 | 2 % |
| Others | 1 | 2 % |
Fig. 2VZV positivity of serum, throat swab, urine, Vesicular fluid, and crust clinical specimens by Real-time PCR at different POD interval.
Single nucleotide polymorphism of partial ORF 22, PstI site (partial ORF 38) and BglI site (partial ORF 54) based analysis of VZV sequences.
| Accession numbers for ORF-22 | Genotype | Clade | 37902 | 38019 | 38055 | 38081 | 38177 | 38229 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M1 | 4/5 | A | G | T | C | G | A | |||
| M1 | 4/5 | A | G | T | C | G | A | |||
| M1 | 4/5 | A | G | T | C | G | A | |||
| M1 | 4/5 | A | G | T | C | G | A | |||
| M1 | 4/5 | A | G | T | C | G | A | |||
| M2 | 1/3 | A | G | C | C | A | A | |||
| M1 | 4/5 | A | G | T | C | G | A | |||
| M2 | 1/3 | A | G | C | C | A | A | |||
| M1 | 4/5 | A | G | T | C | G | A | |||
| M1 | 4/5 | A | G | T | C | G | A | |||
| M1 | 4/5 | A | G | T | C | G | A | |||
| M1 | 4/5 | A | G | T | C | G | A | |||
| M1 | 4/5 | A | G | T | C | G | A | |||
| M1 | 4/5 | A | G | T | C | G | A | |||
| M1 | 4/5 | A | G | T | C | G | A | |||
| M1 | 4/5 | A | G | T | C | G | A | |||
| M1 | 4/5 | A | G | T | C | G | A | |||
| M1 | 4/5 | A | G | T | C | G | A | |||
| M1 | 4/5 | A | G | T | C | G | A | |||
| M2 | 1/3 | A | G | C | C | A | A | |||
| M1 | 4/5 | A | G | T | C | G | A | |||
| M1 | 4/5 | A | G | T | C | G | A | |||
| M1 | 4/5 | A | G | T | C | G | A |
Samples showing mutation in sequence in comparison to other circulating sequences.
Fig. 3Phylogenetic tree of representative VZV gB sequences retrieved from the study along with reference VZV sequences downloaded from GenBank.