| Literature DB >> 30175131 |
Sergio Alexandre Gehrke1,2,3, Berenice Anina Dedavid4, Jaime Sardá Aramburú5,6, Letícia Pérez-Díaz7, José Luis Calvo Guirado8, Patrícia Mazon Canales9, Piedad N De Aza3.
Abstract
Background: The objective of the present histologic animal study was to analyze whether roughness of the titanium surface can influence and/or stimulate the bone growth in defects filled with the blood using a rabbit tibia model. Materials andEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30175131 PMCID: PMC6106843 DOI: 10.1155/2018/4265474
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Figure 1Image of the healing abutment used in this study, which received the surface treatment in the transmucosal portion.
Figure 2Schematic images showed the difference between the implant diameter and abutment diameter generating a bone gap of 0.5 × 1.5mm around of all sets.
Figure 3Image showed the height bone growth was measured with respect to the implant platform at the bone contact with the healing abutment.
Figure 4Scheme of the area predetermined (0.25mm2) to count the osteocytes. In (D), the osteocytes are counted in the ImageJ program.
Figure 5SEM of the surfaces after the treatment on the titanium discs of group A, group B, group C, and group D.
Mean and standard deviation of the surface groups profilometry (in μm).
| Rugosity parameters | Z | Rq | Ra | Rz |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.91 ± 0.11 | 0.15 ± 0.01 | 0.12 ± 0.02 | 0.94 ± 0.10 |
|
| 1.96 ± 0.13 | 0.42 ± 0.06 | 0.29 ± 0.03 | 1.26 ± 0.09 |
|
| 3.84 ± 1.18 | 0.93 ± 0.07 | 0.70 ± 0.05 | 3.12 ± 0.91 |
|
| 2.93 ± 1.02 | 0.82 ± 0.19 | 0.56 ± 0.10 | 2.59 ± 0.89 |
Z indicates longest distance recorded between the peak and the valley, high variation of the valleys; Ra, arithmetic average of the absolute values of all profile points; Rq, the root-mean square of the values of all points; Rz, the average value of the absolute heights of the 5 highest peaks and the depths of the 5 deepest valleys.
Figure 6Histological images 8 weeks after healing of group A, group B, group C, and group D, respectively.
Figure 7Box plots graph of the bone height measured in accordance with the scheme of Figure 3 in each group.
Figure 8Point graph with the mean and standard deviation of the osteocytes count in accordance with the scheme of Figure 4 for each group.
Statistical t-test comparing the data among the 4 proposed groups.
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| - - - | 0.0005 | < 0.0001 | < 0.0001 |
|
| 0.0005 | - - - | 0.0588 | 0.0051 |
|
| < 0.0001 | 0.0588 | - - - | 0.1202 |
|
| < 0.0001 | 0.0051 | 0.1202 | - - - |
∗Statistical significative difference with p < 0.05.