Jing Yan1, Marina R Kaizer1, Yu Zhang2. 1. Department of Biomateirals & Biomimetics, New York University College of Dentistry, New York, NY 10010, United States. 2. Department of Biomateirals & Biomimetics, New York University College of Dentistry, New York, NY 10010, United States. Electronic address: yz21@nyu.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the load-bearing capacity of monolithic lithium disilicate (LiDi - IPS e.max CAD) and novel ultra-translucent zirconia restorative systems of various compositions: 5Y-PSZ (5 mol% yttria-partially-stabilized zirconia) and 4Y-PSZ (4 mol% yttria-partially-stabilized zirconia); relative to a 3Y-TZP (3 mol% yttria-stabilized zirconia) control. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Experiments were carried out with 10 disc specimens (Ø12 ×1 mm) per ceramic material. The zirconia intaglio surface (as machined) was sandblasted (50 µm Al2O3 at 2 bar), while LiDi was etched with 5% HF for 20 s. The ceramic discs were then adhesively bonded onto a dentin-like substrate (G10, a high-pressure fiberglass material) using Multilink Automix cement and Monobond Plus primer, producing a ceramic/cement/dentin-like substrate trilayer structure. The bonded specimens were stored in water for 3 days at 37 °C prior to a Hertzian indentation flexural radial fracture test. The plate-on-foundation theory was used to validate the load-bearing capacity of the trilayer systems based on the flexural tensile stress at the ceramic intaglio (cementation) surface-a cause for bulk fracture of ceramic onlays. RESULTS: The experiment data showed that, when bonded to and supported by a dentin-like substrate, the load-bearing capacity of LiDi (872 N) is superior to the 5Y-PSZ (715 N) and can even reach that of 4Y-PSZ (864 N), while 3Y-TZP still holds the highest load-bearing capacity (1195 N). Theoretical analyses agree with experimental observations. The translucency of 5Y-PSZ approaches that of LiDi, which are superior to both 4Y-PSZ and 3Y-TZP. CONCLUSIONS: When adhesively bonded to and supported by dentin, lithium disilicate exhibits similar load-bearing properties to 4Y-PSZ but much better than 5Y-PSZ.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the load-bearing capacity of monolithic lithium disilicate (LiDi - IPS e.max CAD) and novel ultra-translucent zirconia restorative systems of various compositions: 5Y-PSZ (5 mol% yttria-partially-stabilized zirconia) and 4Y-PSZ (4 mol% yttria-partially-stabilized zirconia); relative to a 3Y-TZP (3 mol% yttria-stabilized zirconia) control. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Experiments were carried out with 10 disc specimens (Ø12 ×1 mm) per ceramic material. The zirconia intaglio surface (as machined) was sandblasted (50 µm Al2O3 at 2 bar), while LiDi was etched with 5% HF for 20 s. The ceramic discs were then adhesively bonded onto a dentin-like substrate (G10, a high-pressure fiberglass material) using Multilink Automix cement and Monobond Plus primer, producing a ceramic/cement/dentin-like substrate trilayer structure. The bonded specimens were stored in water for 3 days at 37 °C prior to a Hertzian indentation flexural radial fracture test. The plate-on-foundation theory was used to validate the load-bearing capacity of the trilayer systems based on the flexural tensile stress at the ceramic intaglio (cementation) surface-a cause for bulk fracture of ceramic onlays. RESULTS: The experiment data showed that, when bonded to and supported by a dentin-like substrate, the load-bearing capacity of LiDi (872 N) is superior to the 5Y-PSZ (715 N) and can even reach that of 4Y-PSZ (864 N), while 3Y-TZP still holds the highest load-bearing capacity (1195 N). Theoretical analyses agree with experimental observations. The translucency of 5Y-PSZ approaches that of LiDi, which are superior to both 4Y-PSZ and 3Y-TZP. CONCLUSIONS: When adhesively bonded to and supported by dentin, lithium disilicate exhibits similar load-bearing properties to 4Y-PSZ but much better than 5Y-PSZ.
Authors: Nathália de Carvalho Ramos; Tiago Moreira Bastos Campos; Igor Siqueira de La Paz; João Paulo Barros Machado; Marco Antonio Bottino; Paulo Francisco Cesar; Renata Marques de Melo Journal: Dent Mater Date: 2016-04-16 Impact factor: 5.304
Authors: E Dianne Rekow; Guangming Zhang; Van Thompson; Jae-Won Kim; Paulo Coehlo; Yu Zhang Journal: J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater Date: 2009-02 Impact factor: 3.368
Authors: Nathaniel C Lawson; Carlos A Jurado; Chan-Te Huang; Geoffrey P Morris; John O Burgess; Perng-Ru Liu; Keith E Kinderknecht; Chee Paul Lin; Daniel A Givan Journal: J Prosthodont Date: 2019-06-11 Impact factor: 2.752
Authors: Zaid Badr; Lee Culp; Ibrahim Duqum; Chek Hai Lim; Yu Zhang; Taiseer A Sulaiman Journal: J Esthet Restor Dent Date: 2022-03-21 Impact factor: 3.040