Literature DB >> 30172920

Understanding health decision making: An exploration of homophily.

Donna L Berry1, Traci M Blonquist2, Rachel Pozzar3, Manan M Nayak2.   

Abstract

The phenomenon of homophily first was described in Lazarsfeld and Merton's classic 1954 friendship analysis as a tendency for friendships to form between those who are alike in some respect. Although theories of decision making address a host of factors that affect the process, the influence of individuals with homophilic ties remains unaccounted for and unexplained. The purpose of this paper is to review theories relevant to decision making and describe what is known about the relationship between homophily and health care decision making. Further, we provide new evidence suggesting the influence of homophily on decision making in results from a randomized, multi-center clinical trial of American men with localized prostate cancer. A diverse sample of 293 men with a new diagnosis of localized prostate cancer reported relevant personal factors influencing the care management decision before randomization to a decision aid or usual care, between 2013 and 2015. Among these personal factors were the level of influence or importance ascribed to various individuals at the time of the treatment decision. One month later, participants reported how prepared they were for decision making. 123 men (42%) reported friends and/or coworkers as information sources, of which 65 (53%) indicated that friends and/or coworkers influenced the care decision. Men who reported friends/coworkers as information sources had significantly higher one-month preparation scores. Our review of decision making theories and practical applicability suggests the influence of homophilic relationships manifests in health care decision making. Faced with a list of options to manage health conditions, decision makers turn to known individuals in their environments, particularly those individuals with whom the decision maker can identify. Clinicians may solicit information from patients about influential others and explain how that support fits into the health decision at hand without dishonoring the importance of the homophilic relationship.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Decision making; Decision theory; Prostate cancer; Social networks

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30172920      PMCID: PMC6367720          DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.08.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  42 in total

1.  Social distance and homophily in adolescent smoking initiation.

Authors:  Myong-Hyun Go; Joan S Tucker; Harold D Green; Michael Pollard; David Kennedy
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 4.492

Review 2.  Outcome effectiveness of the lay health advisor model among Latinos in the United States: an examination by role.

Authors:  Guadalupe X Ayala; Lara Vaz; Jo Anne Earp; John P Elder; Andrea Cherrington
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2010-07-05

3.  Substance abuse treatment utilization, HIV risk behaviors, and recruitment among suburban injection drug users in Long Island, New York.

Authors:  Carol-Ann Watson; Charlene Xuelin Weng; Tyler French; Bridget J Anderson; Chris Nemeth; Louise-Anne McNutt; Lou C Smith
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2014-04

Review 4.  Cognitive science contributions to decision science.

Authors:  Jerome R Busemeyer
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2014-12-10

5.  Advancing understanding of the sustainability of lay health advisor (LHA) programs for African-American women in community settings.

Authors:  Rachel C Shelton; Thana-Ashley Charles; Sheba King Dunston; Lina Jandorf; Deborah O Erwin
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 3.046

6.  Do colleagues influence our lifestyle: the matter of smoking, body mass index and leisure-time physical activity?

Authors:  Helle Gram Quist; Ulla Christensen; Isabella Gomes Carneiro; Jørgen Vinsløv Hansen; Jakob Bue Bjorner
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2014-07-26       Impact factor: 4.018

7.  Information seeking and social support in online health communities: impact on patients' perceived empathy.

Authors:  Priya Nambisan
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2011-05-01       Impact factor: 4.497

8.  Psychosocial determinants of cancer-related information seeking among cancer patients.

Authors:  Aaron Smith-McLallen; Martin Fishbein; Robert C Hornik
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2011-02

9.  Communication networks of men facing a diagnosis of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Dot Brown; John Oetzel; Alison Henderson
Journal:  J Clin Nurs       Date:  2016-08-15       Impact factor: 3.036

10.  Treatment decision-making by men with localized prostate cancer: the influence of personal factors.

Authors:  Donna L Berry; William J Ellis; Nancy Fugate Woods; Christina Schwien; Kristin H Mullen; Claire Yang
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.498

View more
  2 in total

1.  Social networks of oncology clinicians as a means for increasing survivorship clinic referral.

Authors:  Sarah E Piombo; Kimberly A Miller; David R Freyer; Joel E Milam; Anamara Ritt-Olson; Gino K In; Thomas W Valente
Journal:  Commun Med (Lond)       Date:  2022-07-15

2.  Adverse pregnancy outcome disclosure and women's social networks: a qualitative multi-country study with implications for improved reporting in surveys.

Authors:  Doris Kwesiga; Leif Eriksson; Christopher Garimoi Orach; Charlotte Tawiah; Md Ali Imam; Ane B Fisker; Yeetey Enuameh; Joy E Lawn; Hannah Blencowe; Peter Waiswa; Hannah Bradby; Mats Malqvist
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 3.007

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.