| Literature DB >> 30172776 |
Marie Robin1, Raphaël Porcher2, Annalisa Ruggeri3, Didier Blaise4, Christine Wolschke5, Linda Koster6, Emanuele Angelucci7, Friedrich Stölzel8, Victoria Potter9, Ibrahim Yakoub-Agha10, Yener Koc11, Fabio Ciceri12, Jürgen Finke13, Hélène Labussière-Wallet14, Maria Jesús Pascual Cascon15, Mareike Verbeek16, Alessandro Rambaldi17, Jan J Cornelissen18, Patrice Chevallier19, Rohini Radia20, Arnon Nagler21, Nathalie Fegueux22, Eliane Gluckman23, Theo de Witte24, Nicolaus Kröger4.
Abstract
Recently, haploidentical transplantation (haplo) using post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) has been reported to give very encouraging results in patients with hematological malignancies. Patients who have no HLA-matched donor currently have the choice between a mismatched unrelated donor, an unrelated cord blood (CB) donor, and a haploidentical related donor. The aim of our study is to compare the outcome of patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) who have been transplanted from a haploidentical donor using PTCy, an HLA-mismatched unrelated donor (marrow or peripheral blood stem cells), or an unrelated mismatched CB donor. A total of 833 MDS patients from the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) registry, transplanted between 2011 and 2016, were identified. The potential benefit of haplo was compared with mismatched unrelated and CB donors in an adjusted and weighted model taking into account potential confounders and other prognostic variables. Haplo was at lower risk of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) than mismatched unrelated donor (P = .010) but at similar risk than CB. Progression-free survival was better after haplo (versus mismatched unrelated, P = .056; versus CB, P = .003) and overall survival tended to be superior after haplo (versus mismatched unrelated, P = .082; versus CB, P = .002). Nonrelapse mortality was not significantly different between haplo and mismatched unrelated donors. Relapse risk was not influenced by the type of donor. In conclusion, patients with MDS from the EBMT registry receiving hematopoietic stem cell transplantation from a haplo donor have significantly better outcome than those receiving hematopoietic stem cell transplantation from a CB donor and at least similar or better outcome than with a mismatched unrelated donor. Prospective studies comparing the type of donors will be needed to confirm this assumption.Entities:
Keywords: HLA-mismatched donor; Haploidentical transplant; MDS; Myelodysplastic syndrome
Year: 2018 PMID: 30172776 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2018.08.026
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biol Blood Marrow Transplant ISSN: 1083-8791 Impact factor: 5.742