Literature DB >> 30172776

HLA-Mismatched Donors in Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndrome: An EBMT Registry Analysis.

Marie Robin1, Raphaël Porcher2, Annalisa Ruggeri3, Didier Blaise4, Christine Wolschke5, Linda Koster6, Emanuele Angelucci7, Friedrich Stölzel8, Victoria Potter9, Ibrahim Yakoub-Agha10, Yener Koc11, Fabio Ciceri12, Jürgen Finke13, Hélène Labussière-Wallet14, Maria Jesús Pascual Cascon15, Mareike Verbeek16, Alessandro Rambaldi17, Jan J Cornelissen18, Patrice Chevallier19, Rohini Radia20, Arnon Nagler21, Nathalie Fegueux22, Eliane Gluckman23, Theo de Witte24, Nicolaus Kröger4.   

Abstract

Recently, haploidentical transplantation (haplo) using post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) has been reported to give very encouraging results in patients with hematological malignancies. Patients who have no HLA-matched donor currently have the choice between a mismatched unrelated donor, an unrelated cord blood (CB) donor, and a haploidentical related donor. The aim of our study is to compare the outcome of patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) who have been transplanted from a haploidentical donor using PTCy, an HLA-mismatched unrelated donor (marrow or peripheral blood stem cells), or an unrelated mismatched CB donor. A total of 833 MDS patients from the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) registry, transplanted between 2011 and 2016, were identified. The potential benefit of haplo was compared with mismatched unrelated and CB donors in an adjusted and weighted model taking into account potential confounders and other prognostic variables. Haplo was at lower risk of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) than mismatched unrelated donor (P = .010) but at similar risk than CB. Progression-free survival was better after haplo (versus mismatched unrelated, P = .056; versus CB, P = .003) and overall survival tended to be superior after haplo (versus mismatched unrelated, P = .082; versus CB, P = .002). Nonrelapse mortality was not significantly different between haplo and mismatched unrelated donors. Relapse risk was not influenced by the type of donor. In conclusion, patients with MDS from the EBMT registry receiving hematopoietic stem cell transplantation from a haplo donor have significantly better outcome than those receiving hematopoietic stem cell transplantation from a CB donor and at least similar or better outcome than with a mismatched unrelated donor. Prospective studies comparing the type of donors will be needed to confirm this assumption.
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  HLA-mismatched donor; Haploidentical transplant; MDS; Myelodysplastic syndrome

Year:  2018        PMID: 30172776     DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2018.08.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant        ISSN: 1083-8791            Impact factor:   5.742


  7 in total

1.  The Predicted Indirectly Recognizable HLA Epitopes (PIRCHE) Score for HLA Class I Graft-versus-Host Disparity Is Associated with Increased Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease in Haploidentical Transplantation with Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide.

Authors:  Joseph Rimando; Michael Slade; John F DiPersio; Peter Westervelt; Feng Gao; Chang Liu; Rizwan Romee
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  In MDS, is higher risk higher reward?

Authors:  Guillermo F Sanz
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2019-12-06

3.  Outcome of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for hypoplastic myelodysplastic syndrome.

Authors:  Ming Zhou; Liangliang Wu; Yuping Zhang; Wenjian Mo; Yumiao Li; Xiaowei Chen; Caixia Wang; Shiyi Pan; Shilin Xu; Wei Zhou; Tingfen Deng; Shunqing Wang
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2020-08-16       Impact factor: 2.490

4.  Nonmyeloablative Alternative Donor Transplantation for Hodgkin and Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma: From the LWP-EBMT, Eurocord, and CIBMTR.

Authors:  Giancarlo Fatobene; Vanderson Rocha; Andrew St Martin; Mehdi Hamadani; Stephen Robinson; Asad Bashey; Ariane Boumendil; Claudio Brunstein; Luca Castagna; Alida Dominietto; Hervé Finel; Yves Chalandon; Chantal Kenzey; Mohamed Kharfan-Dabaja; Hélène Labussière-Wallet; Jose M Moraleda; Rocco Pastano; Miguel-Angel Perales; Hanadi Rafii El Ayoubi; Annalisa Ruggeri; Anna Sureda; Fernanda Volt; Ibrahim Yakoub-Agha; Mei-Jie Zhang; Eliane Gluckman; Silvia Montoto; Mary Eapen
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 50.717

5.  Haploidentical Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Versus Umbilical Cord Blood Transplantation in Hematologic Malignancies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Ran Wu; Liyuan Ma
Journal:  Cell Transplant       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 4.064

6.  Comparison of outcomes for HLA-matched sibling and haplo-identical donors in Myelodysplastic syndromes: report from the chronic malignancies working party of EBMT.

Authors:  Kavita Raj; Dirk-Jan Eikema; Vipul Sheth; Linda Koster; Liesbeth C de Wreede; Didier Blaise; Carmela Di Grazia; Yener Koc; Victoria Potter; Patrice Chevallier; Lucia Lopez-Corral; Depei Wu; Stephan Mielke; Johan Maertens; Ellen Meijer; Anne Huynh; Jakob Passweg; Thomas Luft; Jose Antonio Pérez-Simón; Fabio Ciceri; Agnieszka Piekarska; G Hayri Ozsan; Nicolaus Kröger; Marie Robin; Ibrahim Yakoub-Agha
Journal:  Blood Cancer J       Date:  2022-09-28       Impact factor: 9.812

7.  Biologic Assignment Trial of Reduced-Intensity Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Based on Donor Availability in Patients 50-75 Years of Age With Advanced Myelodysplastic Syndrome.

Authors:  Ryotaro Nakamura; Wael Saber; Michael J Martens; Alyssa Ramirez; Bart Scott; Betul Oran; Eric Leifer; Roni Tamari; Asmita Mishra; Richard T Maziarz; Joseph McGuirk; Peter Westervelt; Sumithira Vasu; Mrinal Patnaik; Rammurti Kamble; Stephen J Forman; Mikkael A Sekeres; Frederick Appelbaum; Adam Mendizabal; Brent Logan; Mary Horowitz; Corey Cutler
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 50.717

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.