Literature DB >> 34106753

Biologic Assignment Trial of Reduced-Intensity Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Based on Donor Availability in Patients 50-75 Years of Age With Advanced Myelodysplastic Syndrome.

Ryotaro Nakamura1, Wael Saber2, Michael J Martens2, Alyssa Ramirez3, Bart Scott4, Betul Oran5, Eric Leifer6, Roni Tamari7, Asmita Mishra8, Richard T Maziarz9, Joseph McGuirk10, Peter Westervelt11, Sumithira Vasu12, Mrinal Patnaik13, Rammurti Kamble14, Stephen J Forman1, Mikkael A Sekeres15, Frederick Appelbaum4, Adam Mendizabal3, Brent Logan2, Mary Horowitz2, Corey Cutler16.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is the only potentially curative therapy for myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), although it is infrequently offered to older patients. The relative benefits of HCT over non-HCT therapy in older patients with higher-risk MDS have not been defined.
METHODS: We conducted a multicenter biologic assignment trial comparing reduced-intensity HCT to hypomethylating therapy or best supportive care in subjects 50-75 years of age with intermediate-2 or high-risk de novo MDS. The primary outcome was overall survival probability at 3 years. Between January 2014 and November 2018, we enrolled 384 subjects at 34 centers. Subjects were assigned to the Donor or No-Donor arms according to the availability of a matched donor within 90 days of study registration.
RESULTS: The median follow-up time for surviving subjects was 34.2 months (range: 2.3-38 months) in the Donor arm and 26.9 months (range: 2.4-37.2 months) in the No-Donor arm. In an intention-to-treat analysis, the adjusted overall survival rate at 3 years in the Donor arm was 47.9% (95% CI, 41.3 to 54.1) compared with 26.6% (95% CI, 18.4 to 35.6) in the No-Donor arm (P = .0001) with an absolute difference of 21.3% (95% CI, 10.2 to 31.8). Leukemia-free survival at 3 years was greater in the Donor arm (35.8%; 95% CI, 29.8 to 41.8) compared with the No-Donor arm (20.6%; 95% CI, 13.3 to 29.1; P = .003). The survival benefit was seen across all subgroups examined.
CONCLUSION: We observed a significant survival advantage in older subjects with higher-risk MDS who have a matched donor identified and underwent reduced-intensity HCT, when compared with those without a donor. HCT should be included as an integral part of MDS management plans in fit older adults with higher-risk MDS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34106753      PMCID: PMC8791814          DOI: 10.1200/JCO.20.03380

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   50.717


  43 in total

1.  Analyzing survival curves at a fixed point in time.

Authors:  John P Klein; Brent Logan; Mette Harhoff; Per Kragh Andersen
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2007-10-30       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Quality of life measurement in bone marrow transplantation: development of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Bone Marrow Transplant (FACT-BMT) scale.

Authors:  R P McQuellon; G B Russell; D F Cella; B L Craven; M Brady; A Bonomi; D D Hurd
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 5.483

3.  International scoring system for evaluating prognosis in myelodysplastic syndromes.

Authors:  P Greenberg; C Cox; M M LeBeau; P Fenaux; P Morel; G Sanz; M Sanz; T Vallespi; T Hamblin; D Oscier; K Ohyashiki; K Toyama; C Aul; G Mufti; J Bennett
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1997-03-15       Impact factor: 22.113

4.  A comparison of allogeneic bone marrow transplantation, autologous bone marrow transplantation, and aggressive chemotherapy in children with acute myeloid leukemia in remission.

Authors:  W G Woods; S Neudorf; S Gold; J Sanders; J D Buckley; D R Barnard; K Dusenbery; J DeSwarte; D C Arthur; B J Lange; N L Kobrinsky
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2001-01-01       Impact factor: 22.113

5.  Quantification of the completeness of follow-up.

Authors:  Taane G Clark; Douglas G Altman; Bianca L De Stavola
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-04-13       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Efficacy of azacitidine compared with that of conventional care regimens in the treatment of higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes: a randomised, open-label, phase III study.

Authors:  Pierre Fenaux; Ghulam J Mufti; Eva Hellstrom-Lindberg; Valeria Santini; Carlo Finelli; Aristoteles Giagounidis; Robert Schoch; Norbert Gattermann; Guillermo Sanz; Alan List; Steven D Gore; John F Seymour; John M Bennett; John Byrd; Jay Backstrom; Linda Zimmerman; David McKenzie; Cl Beach; Lewis R Silverman
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2009-02-21       Impact factor: 41.316

7.  Characteristics of US patients with myelodysplastic syndromes: results of six cross-sectional physician surveys.

Authors:  Mikkael A Sekeres; W Marieke Schoonen; Hagop Kantarjian; Alan List; Jon Fryzek; Ronald Paquette; Jaroslaw P Maciejewski
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2008-10-28       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Comparison of Patient Age Groups in Transplantation for Myelodysplastic Syndrome: The Medicare Coverage With Evidence Development Study.

Authors:  Ehab Atallah; Brent Logan; Min Chen; Corey Cutler; Joachim Deeg; Meagan Jacoby; Richard Champlin; Taiga Nishihori; Dennis Confer; James Gajewski; Stephanie Farnia; Peter Greenberg; Erica Warlick; Daniel Weisdorf; Wael Saber; Mary M Horowitz; J Douglas Rizzo
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 31.777

9.  Multicenter biologic assignment trial comparing reduced-intensity allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant to hypomethylating therapy or best supportive care in patients aged 50 to 75 with intermediate-2 and high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome: Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network #1102 study rationale, design, and methods.

Authors:  Wael Saber; Jennifer Le Rademacher; Mikkael Sekeres; Brent Logan; Moira Lewis; Adam Mendizabal; Eric Leifer; Frederick R Appelbaum; Mary M Horowitz; Ryotaro Nakamura; Corey S Cutler
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Randomized Phase II Study of Azacitidine Alone or in Combination With Lenalidomide or With Vorinostat in Higher-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes and Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia: North American Intergroup Study SWOG S1117.

Authors:  Mikkael A Sekeres; Megan Othus; Alan F List; Olatoyosi Odenike; Richard M Stone; Steven D Gore; Mark R Litzow; Rena Buckstein; Min Fang; Diane Roulston; Clara D Bloomfield; Anna Moseley; Aziz Nazha; Yanming Zhang; Mario R Velasco; Rakesh Gaur; Ehab Atallah; Eyal C Attar; Elina K Cook; Alyssa H Cull; Michael J Rauh; Frederick R Appelbaum; Harry P Erba
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 50.717

View more
  6 in total

1.  Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for older patients.

Authors:  Richard J Lin; Andrew S Artz
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2021-12-10

Review 2.  BMT for Myelodysplastic Syndrome: When and Where and How.

Authors:  Akriti G Jain; Hany Elmariah
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 6.244

3.  Historical expectations with DNA methyltransferase inhibitor monotherapy in MDS: when is combination therapy truly "promising"?

Authors:  Andrew M Brunner; Geoffrey Fell; David P Steensma
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2022-05-10

Review 4.  Past, present and future in low-risk myelodysplastic syndrome.

Authors:  Selami Kocak Toprak
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-07-15

Review 5.  The development of pevonedistat in myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML): hope or hype?

Authors:  Anson Snow; Joshua F Zeidner
Journal:  Ther Adv Hematol       Date:  2022-07-22

6.  Failure to reach hematopoietic allogenic stem cell transplantation in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes planned for transplantation: a population-based study.

Authors:  C Lindholm; E Olofsson; M Creignou; L Nilsson; H Gravdahl Garelius; J Cammenga; P Ljungman; E Ejerblad; M Tobiasson
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 5.483

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.