Dana E Johnson1, Alva Tang2, Alisa N Almas3, Kathryn A Degnan4, Katie A McLaughlin5, Charles A Nelson6, Nathan A Fox2, Charles H Zeanah7, Stacy S Drury7. 1. Division of Neonatology and Global Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minnesota, MN. Electronic address: johns008@umn.edu. 2. Department of Human Development and Quantitative Methodology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD. 3. The Human Early Learning Partnership, School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia. 4. Department of Psychology, Catholic University of America, Washington, DC. 5. Department of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA. 6. Harvard Graduate School of Education, Division of Developmental Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, MA. 7. Department of Psychiatry, Tulane University Health Science Center, New Orleans, LA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To determine the effects of foster care vs institutional care, as well as disruptions in the caregiving environment on physical development through early adolescence. STUDY DESIGN: This was a randomized controlled trial of 114 institutionalized, though otherwise healthy, children from 6 orphanages and 51 never institutionalized control children living in birth families (family care group) in Bucharest, Romania. Children were followed from baseline (21 months, range 5-31) through age 12 years for caregiving disruptions and growth trajectories and through age 14 years for pubertal development. RESULTS: Children randomized to the foster care group showed greater rates of growth in height, weight, and body mass index (BMI) through age 12 years than institutionalized group. Tanner development was delayed in institutionalized group boys compared with foster care group and family care group boys at 12 but not 14 years. There were no differences in Tanner development and age of menarche among foster care group, institutionalized group, and family care group girls at ages 12 and 14 years. More disruptions in caregiving between 30 months and 12 years moderated decreases in growth rates of height in foster care group and weight in foster care group and institutionalized group across age. institutionalized group boys with ≥2 disruptions showed lower Tanner scores at age 12 vs institutionalized group and foster care group boys with <2 disruptions. foster care group girls with ≥2 disruptions had higher Tanner scores at age 14 vs foster care group girls with <2 disruptions. Age of menarche was not affected by caregiving disruptions. CONCLUSIONS: For children who experienced early institutionalization, stable placement within family care is essential to ensuring the best outcomes for physical developmental. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov: NCT00747396.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: To determine the effects of foster care vs institutional care, as well as disruptions in the caregiving environment on physical development through early adolescence. STUDY DESIGN: This was a randomized controlled trial of 114 institutionalized, though otherwise healthy, children from 6 orphanages and 51 never institutionalized control children living in birth families (family care group) in Bucharest, Romania. Children were followed from baseline (21 months, range 5-31) through age 12 years for caregiving disruptions and growth trajectories and through age 14 years for pubertal development. RESULTS:Children randomized to the foster care group showed greater rates of growth in height, weight, and body mass index (BMI) through age 12 years than institutionalized group. Tanner development was delayed in institutionalized group boys compared with foster care group and family care group boys at 12 but not 14 years. There were no differences in Tanner development and age of menarche among foster care group, institutionalized group, and family care group girls at ages 12 and 14 years. More disruptions in caregiving between 30 months and 12 years moderated decreases in growth rates of height in foster care group and weight in foster care group and institutionalized group across age. institutionalized group boys with ≥2 disruptions showed lower Tanner scores at age 12 vs institutionalized group and foster care group boys with <2 disruptions. foster care group girls with ≥2 disruptions had higher Tanner scores at age 14 vs foster care group girls with <2 disruptions. Age of menarche was not affected by caregiving disruptions. CONCLUSIONS: For children who experienced early institutionalization, stable placement within family care is essential to ensuring the best outcomes for physical developmental. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov: NCT00747396.
Authors: Charles H Zeanah; Sebastian F Koga; Bogdan Simion; Alin Stanescu; Cristian L Tabacaru; Nathan A Fox; Charles A Nelson Journal: Infant Ment Health J Date: 2006-11
Authors: Bonnie D Kerker; Jinjin Zhang; Erum Nadeem; Ruth E K Stein; Michael S Hurlburt; Amy Heneghan; John Landsverk; Sarah McCue Horwitz Journal: Acad Pediatr Date: 2015-07-14 Impact factor: 3.107
Authors: Wendy L Hellerstedt; Nikki J Madsen; Megan R Gunnar; Harold D Grotevant; Richard M Lee; Dana E Johnson Journal: Matern Child Health J Date: 2007-06-12
Authors: Brie M Reid; Bradley S Miller; Lorah D Dorn; Christopher Desjardins; Bonny Donzella; Megan Gunnar Journal: Pediatr Res Date: 2017-05-24 Impact factor: 3.756
Authors: Jennifer A Sumner; Natalie L Colich; Monica Uddin; Don Armstrong; Katie A McLaughlin Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2018-09-26 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Natalie L Colich; Margaret A Sheridan; Kathryn L Humphreys; Mark Wade; Florin Tibu; Charles A Nelson; Charles H Zeanah; Nathan A Fox; Katie A McLaughlin Journal: J Child Psychol Psychiatry Date: 2020-11-20 Impact factor: 8.982