Chong Duan1, Ruimeng Yang2, Liya Yuan3, John A Engelbach4, Christina I Tsien5, Keith M Rich6, Sonika M Dahiya7, Tanner M Johanns8, Joseph J H Ackerman9, Joel R Garbow10. 1. Department of Chemistry, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri. 2. Department of Radiology, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri; Department of Radiology, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China. 3. Department of Neurosurgery, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri. 4. Department of Radiology, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri. 5. Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri. 6. Department of Neurosurgery, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri; Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri. 7. Department of Neuropathology, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri. 8. Department of Medicine, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri. 9. Department of Chemistry, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri; Department of Radiology, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri; Department of Medicine, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri; Alvin J Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri. 10. Department of Radiology, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri; Alvin J Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri. Electronic address: garbow@wustl.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Glioblastoma (GBM) remains incurable, despite state-of-the-art treatment involving surgical resection, chemotherapy, and radiation. GBM invariably recurs as a highly invasive and aggressive phenotype, with the majority of recurrences within the radiation therapy treatment field. Although a large body of literature reporting on primary GBM exists, comprehensive studies of how prior irradiation alters recurrent tumor growth are lacking. An animal model that replicates the delayed effects of radiation therapy on the brain microenvironment, and its impact on the development of recurrent GBM, would be a significant advance. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Cohorts of mice received a single fraction of 0, 20, 30, or 40 Gy Gamma Knife irradiation. Naïve, nonirradiated mouse GBM tumor cells were implanted into the ipsilateral hemisphere 6 weeks postirradiation. Tumor growth was measured by magnetic resonance imaging, and animal survival was assessed by monitoring weight loss. Magnetic resonance imaging results were supported by hemotoxylin and eosin histology. RESULTS: Tumorous lesions generated from orthotopic implantation of nonirradiated mouse GBM tumor cells into irradiated mouse brain grew far more aggressively and invasively than implantation of these same cells into nonirradiated brain. Lesions in irradiated brain tissue were significantly larger, more necrotic, and more vascular than those in control animals with increased invasiveness of tumor cells in the periphery, consistent with the histologic features commonly observed in recurrent high-grade tumors in patients. CONCLUSIONS: Irradiation of normal brain primes the targeted cellular microenvironment for aggressive tumor growth when naïve (not previously irradiated) cancer cells are subsequently introduced. The resultant growth pattern is similar to the highly aggressive pattern of tumor regrowth observed clinically after therapeutic radiation therapy. The mouse model offers an avenue for determining the cellular and molecular basis for the aggressiveness of recurrent GBM.
PURPOSE:Glioblastoma (GBM) remains incurable, despite state-of-the-art treatment involving surgical resection, chemotherapy, and radiation. GBM invariably recurs as a highly invasive and aggressive phenotype, with the majority of recurrences within the radiation therapy treatment field. Although a large body of literature reporting on primary GBM exists, comprehensive studies of how prior irradiation alters recurrent tumor growth are lacking. An animal model that replicates the delayed effects of radiation therapy on the brain microenvironment, and its impact on the development of recurrent GBM, would be a significant advance. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Cohorts of mice received a single fraction of 0, 20, 30, or 40 Gy Gamma Knife irradiation. Naïve, nonirradiated mouseGBMtumor cells were implanted into the ipsilateral hemisphere 6 weeks postirradiation. Tumor growth was measured by magnetic resonance imaging, and animal survival was assessed by monitoring weight loss. Magnetic resonance imaging results were supported by hemotoxylin and eosin histology. RESULTS:Tumorous lesions generated from orthotopic implantation of nonirradiated mouseGBMtumor cells into irradiated mouse brain grew far more aggressively and invasively than implantation of these same cells into nonirradiated brain. Lesions in irradiated brain tissue were significantly larger, more necrotic, and more vascular than those in control animals with increased invasiveness of tumor cells in the periphery, consistent with the histologic features commonly observed in recurrent high-grade tumors in patients. CONCLUSIONS: Irradiation of normal brain primes the targeted cellular microenvironment for aggressive tumor growth when naïve (not previously irradiated) cancer cells are subsequently introduced. The resultant growth pattern is similar to the highly aggressive pattern of tumor regrowth observed clinically after therapeutic radiation therapy. The mouse model offers an avenue for determining the cellular and molecular basis for the aggressiveness of recurrent GBM.
Authors: Chong Duan; Carlos J Perez-Torres; Liya Yuan; John A Engelbach; Scott C Beeman; Christina I Tsien; Keith M Rich; Robert E Schmidt; Joseph J H Ackerman; Joel R Garbow Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2017-04-19 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Shideng Bao; Qiulian Wu; Roger E McLendon; Yueling Hao; Qing Shi; Anita B Hjelmeland; Mark W Dewhirst; Darell D Bigner; Jeremy N Rich Journal: Nature Date: 2006-10-18 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Sarah C Jost; John E Wanebo; Sheng-Kwei Song; Michael R Chicoine; Keith M Rich; Thomas A Woolsey; Jason S Lewis; Robert H Mach; Jinbin Xu; Joel R Garbow Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2007-02 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: P K Sneed; P H Gutin; D A Larson; M K Malec; T L Phillips; M D Prados; C O Scharfen; K A Weaver; W M Wara Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 1994-07-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Thomas N Seyfried; Laura Shelton; Gabriel Arismendi-Morillo; Miriam Kalamian; Ahmed Elsakka; Joseph Maroon; Purna Mukherjee Journal: Neurochem Res Date: 2019-04-25 Impact factor: 3.996
Authors: Xia Ge; Kyu-Ho Song; John A Engelbach; Liya Yuan; Feng Gao; Sonika Dahiya; Keith M Rich; Joseph J H Ackerman; Joel R Garbow Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2022-05-30 Impact factor: 5.738
Authors: Xia Ge; James D Quirk; John A Engelbach; G Larry Bretthorst; Shunqiang Li; Kooresh I Shoghi; Joel R Garbow; Joseph J H Ackerman Journal: Tomography Date: 2019-09
Authors: Maxim O Politko; Alexandra Y Tsidulko; Oxana A Pashkovskaya; Konstantin E Kuper; Anastasia V Suhovskih; Galina M Kazanskaya; Lyubov S Klyushova; Dmitry K Sokolov; Alexander M Volkov; Evgenii E Kliver; Alexander A Zheravin; Svetlana V Aidagulova; Elvira V Grigorieva Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2021-12-12 Impact factor: 5.923
Authors: Joel R Garbow; Tanner M Johanns; Xia Ge; John A Engelbach; Liya Yuan; Sonika Dahiya; Christina I Tsien; Feng Gao; Keith M Rich; Joseph J H Ackerman Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2021-06-24 Impact factor: 6.244