Literature DB >> 28428191

The Role of Minimal Residual Disease Testing in Myeloma Treatment Selection and Drug Development: Current Value and Future Applications.

Kenneth C Anderson1, Daniel Auclair2, Gary J Kelloff3, Caroline C Sigman4, Hervé Avet-Loiseau5, Ann T Farrell6, Nicole J Gormley6, Shaji K Kumar7, Ola Landgren8, Nikhil C Munshi9, Michele Cavo10, Faith E Davies11, Alessandra Di Bacco12, Jennifer S Dickey13, Steven I Gutman14, Howard R Higley4, Mohamad A Hussein15,16, J Milburn Jessup17, Ilan R Kirsch18, Richard F Little3, Robert D Loberg19, Jens G Lohr9, Lata Mukundan4, James L Omel20, Trevor J Pugh21, Gregory H Reaman6, Michael D Robbins22, A Kate Sasser23, Nancy Valente24, Elena Zamagni10.   

Abstract

Treatment of myeloma has benefited from the introduction of more effective and better tolerated agents, improvements in supportive care, better understanding of disease biology, revision of diagnostic criteria, and new sensitive and specific tools for disease prognostication and management. Assessment of minimal residual disease (MRD) in response to therapy is one of these tools, as longer progression-free survival (PFS) is seen consistently among patients who have achieved MRD negativity. Current therapies lead to unprecedented frequency and depth of response, and next-generation flow and sequencing methods to measure MRD in bone marrow are in use and being developed with sensitivities in the range of 10-5 to 10-6 cells. These technologies may be combined with functional imaging to detect MRD outside of bone marrow. Moreover, immune profiling methods are being developed to better understand the immune environment in myeloma and response to immunomodulatory agents while methods for molecular profiling of myeloma cells and circulating DNA in blood are also emerging. With the continued development and standardization of these methodologies, MRD has high potential for use in gaining new drug approvals in myeloma. The FDA has outlined two pathways by which MRD could be qualified as a surrogate endpoint for clinical studies directed at obtaining accelerated approval for new myeloma drugs. Most importantly, better understanding of MRD should also contribute to better treatment monitoring. Potentially, MRD status could be used as a prognostic factor for making treatment decisions and for informing timing of therapeutic interventions. Clin Cancer Res; 23(15); 3980-93. ©2017 AACR. ©2017 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28428191     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-2895

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  26 in total

Review 1.  Overcoming multiple myeloma drug resistance in the era of cancer 'omics'.

Authors:  Matthew Ho Zhi Guang; Amanda McCann; Giada Bianchi; Li Zhang; Paul Dowling; Despina Bazou; Peter O'Gorman; Kenneth C Anderson
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  2017-06-13

2.  Circulating Tumor DNA-Defined Minimal Residual Disease in Solid Tumors: Opportunities to Accelerate the Development of Adjuvant Therapies.

Authors:  Arvind Dasari; Axel Grothey; Scott Kopetz
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-10-30       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 3.  Determination of Minimal Residual Disease in Multiple Myeloma: Does It Matter?

Authors:  Shalin Kothari; Jens Hillengass; Philip L McCarthy; Sarah A Holstein
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 3.952

4.  Bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone as induction therapy prior to autologous transplant in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Laura Rosiñol; Albert Oriol; Rafael Rios; Anna Sureda; María Jesús Blanchard; Miguel Teodoro Hernández; Rafael Martínez-Martínez; Jose M Moraleda; Isidro Jarque; Juan Bargay; Mercedes Gironella; Felipe de Arriba; Luis Palomera; Yolanda González-Montes; Josep M Martí; Isabel Krsnik; Jose M Arguiñano; Maria Esther González; Ana Pilar González; Luis Felipe Casado; Lucia López-Anglada; Bruno Paiva; Maria-Victoria Mateos; Jesus F San Miguel; Juan-José Lahuerta; Joan Bladé
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 5.  Daratumumab: A Review in Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma.

Authors:  Hannah A Blair
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  A large meta-analysis establishes the role of MRD negativity in long-term survival outcomes in patients with multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Nikhil C Munshi; Herve Avet-Loiseau; Kenneth C Anderson; Paola Neri; Bruno Paiva; Mehmet Samur; Meletios Dimopoulos; Margarita Kulakova; Annette Lam; Mahmoud Hashim; Jianming He; Bart Heeg; Jon Ukropec; Jessica Vermeulen; Sarah Cote; Nizar Bahlis
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2020-12-08

Review 7.  Is molecular remission the goal of multiple myeloma therapy?

Authors:  Faith E Davies
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2017-12-08

8.  CD38-targeted Immuno-PET of Multiple Myeloma: From Xenograft Models to First-in-Human Imaging.

Authors:  Gary A Ulaner; Nicholas B Sobol; Joseph A O'Donoghue; Assen S Kirov; Christopher C Riedl; Ryan Min; Eric Smith; Lukas M Carter; Serge K Lyashchenko; Jason S Lewis; C Ola Landgren
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2020-04-07       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Mass Spectrometry-Based Method Targeting Ig Variable Regions for Assessment of Minimal Residual Disease in Multiple Myeloma.

Authors:  Carlo O Martins; Sarah Huet; San S Yi; Maria S Ritorto; Ola Landgren; Ahmet Dogan; Jessica R Chapman
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2020-04-14       Impact factor: 5.568

Review 10.  Comprehensive characterization of circulating and bone marrow-derived multiple myeloma cells at minimal residual disease.

Authors:  Johannes M Waldschmidt; Praveen Anand; Birgit Knoechel; Jens G Lohr
Journal:  Semin Hematol       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 3.851

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.