| Literature DB >> 30170578 |
Yujia Jiang1, Jie Zhou1,2, Ruofan Wu1, Fengxue Xin1,2, Wenming Zhang2, Yan Fang1,2, Jiangfeng Ma1,2, Weiliang Dong3,4, Min Jiang5,6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cyclodextrin glucanotransferase (CGTase) can transform L-ascorbic acid (L-AA, vitamin C) to 2-O-α-D-glucopyranosyl-L-ascorbic acid (AA-2G), which shows diverse applications in food, cosmetic and pharmaceutical industries.Entities:
Keywords: Cyclodextrin glucanotransferase; Glycosyl donors, 2-O-α-D-glucopyranosyl-L-ascorbic acid; Optimized codons
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30170578 PMCID: PMC6119282 DOI: 10.1186/s12896-018-0463-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Biotechnol ISSN: 1472-6750 Impact factor: 2.563
Oligonucleotide primers used for PCR
| Primers | Oligonucleotide sequences (5′ to 3′) |
|---|---|
| F1 | 5′-CAGCAAATGGGTCGC |
| R1 | 5′-GGTGGTGGTGGTGGTG |
| F2 | 5′-CAGCAAATGGGTCGC |
| R2 | 5′-GGTGGTGGTGGTGGTG |
| F3 | 5′-CAGCAAATGGGTCGC |
| R3 | 5′-GGTGGTGGTGGTGGTG |
| F4 | 5′-CAGCAAATGGGTCGC |
| R4 | 5′-GTGGTGGTGGTGGTG |
| F5 | 5′-CAGCAAATGGGTCGC |
| R5 | 5′-GTGGTGGTGGTGGTG |
Underlined segments represent restriction enzyme cutting sites
Fig. 1Condition optimization for Opt-CGT expression. a effects of different IPTG concentration; b effects of different carbon sources; c effects of maltose concentration on intracellular expression of Opt-CGT. Error bars correspond to the standard deviation of three measurements
Fig. 2SDS-PAGE analysis of the purified recombinant Opt-CGT. M protein marker; Lane 1 unpurified total soluble proteins from induced BL21 (DE3) harboring pET-opt-cgt; Lane 2–5 soluble proteins purified by nickel affinity chromatography from induced BL21 (DE3) harboring pET-opt-cgt (15 μL)
Comparison of purification process between native CGTase and Opt-CGT
| Details | Opt-CGT (This study) | Native CGTase |
|---|---|---|
| Origin Organism | ||
| Codon optimization | Yes | No |
| CAI ( | 0.86 | 0.74 |
| Plasmid/host | pET-28a (+)/ | pET-20b (+)/ |
| Induction time (h) | 20 | 90 |
| Total protein of crude enzyme (mg) | 330 | 401 |
| Purification methods | Ni2+-NTA | Q-Sepharose + Phenyl-Superose |
| Total protein of purified enzyme (mg) | 7.66 | 8.31 |
| Specific activity (U/mg) | 190.75 | 198.82 |
| Purification fold | 163 | 13.17 |
| Yield (%) | 55 | 27.27 |
Fig. 3Effects of temperature and pH on enzyme activity and stability of the Opt-CGT. a determination of the optimum temperature; b thermal stability; c determination of the optimum pH; d pH stability. Error bars correspond to the standard deviation of three measurements
Effects of bivalent metal ions and chemical agents on Opt-CGT activity
| Additives | Concentration | Relative activity (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Metal ions | ||
| No addition | 100 ± 1.8 | |
| Fe2+(FeCl2) | 1 mM | 80.6 ± 3.5 |
| Mg2+(MgCl2) | 1 mM | 96.6 ± 1.9 |
| Cu2+(CuCl2) | 1 mM | 59.9 ± 4.8 |
| Ca2+(CaCl2) | 1 mM | 114.9 ± 2.4 |
| Ni2+(NiCl2) | 1 mM | 79.3 ± 3.9 |
| Zn2+(ZnCl2) | 1 mM | 97.3 ± 2.7 |
| Ba2+(BaCl2) | 1 mM | 111.7 ± 2.2 |
| Mn2+(MnCl2) | 1 mM | 101.8 ± 3.1 |
| Co2+(CoCl2) | 1 mM | 94.1 ± 2.3 |
| EDTA | 1 mM | 92.5 ± 2.8 |
| Organic solvents | ||
| Methanol | 10% | 36.9 ± 3.2 |
| Ethanol | 10% | 13.8 ± 1.2 |
| Acetonitrile | 10% | 5.5 ± 0.9 |
| Isopropanol | 10% | 18.9 ± 2.8 |
| DMSO | 5% | 74.2 ± 2.3 |
| Surfactants | ||
| Tween-20 | 20 mg·mL−1 | 32.4 ± 3.1 |
| Tween-80 | 20 mg·mL− 1 | 55.8 ± 3.7 |
| Triton X-100 | 20 mg·mL−1 | 87.1 ± 2.4 |
| SDS | 2 mg·mL−1 | 36.9 ± 3.1 |
| Enzyme inhibitors | ||
| Urea | 20 mg·mL−1 | 97.6 ± 2.7 |
Comparison of the properties between native CGTase and Opt-CGT
| Details | Opt-CGT (This study) | Native CGTase |
|---|---|---|
| Induction time (h) | 20 | 70 |
| Molecular mass | 74 kDa | 75 kDa |
| Optimum temperature (°C) | 50 | 50 |
| Half-life time of the CGTases at 50 °C (min) | ~ 20 | ~ 48 |
| Optimum pH | 6.0 | 5.5 |
| pH stabilities (The activity of CGTases retained > 80%) | 6.0–11.5 | 6.0–10.0 |
Fig. 4HPLC analysis of AA-2G production by the Opt-CGT. a the standard sample of L-AA (0.1 g/L); b the standard sample of AA-2G (0.1 g/L); c reaction products obtained: The peak I is the rest of L-AA and the peak II is the generated AA-2G. The reaction sample was diluted 1000 times before analysis