Literature DB >> 30168872

Long-term demographic and genetic effects of releasing captive-born individuals into the wild.

Janna R Willoughby1, Mark R Christie1,2.   

Abstract

Because of continued habitat destruction and species extirpations, the need to use captive breeding for conservation purposes has been increasing steadily. However, the long-term demographic and genetic effects associated with releasing captive-born individuals with varied life histories into the wild remain largely unknown. To address this question, we developed forward-time, agent-based models for 4 species with long-running captive-breeding and release programs: coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch), golden lion tamarin (Leontopithecus rosalia), western toad (Anaxyrus boreas), and Whooping Crane (Grus americana). We measured the effects of supplementation by comparing population size and neutral genetic diversity in supplemented populations to the same characteristics in unaltered populations 100 years after supplementation ended. Releasing even slightly less fit captive-born individuals to supplement wild populations typically resulted in reductions in population sizes and genetic diversity over the long term when the fitness reductions were heritable (i.e., due to genetic adaptation to captivity) and populations continued to be regulated by density-dependent mechanisms over time. Negative effects for species with longer life spans and lower rates of population replacement were smaller than for species with shorter life spans and higher rates of population replacement. Programs that released captive-born individuals over fewer years or that avoided breeding individuals with captive ancestry had smaller reductions in population size and genetic diversity over the long term. Relying on selection in the wild to remove individuals with reduced fitness mitigated some negative demographic effects, but at a substantial cost to neutral genetic diversity. Our results suggest that conservation-focused captive-breeding programs should take measures to prevent even small amounts of genetic adaptation to captivity, quantitatively determine the minimum number of captive-born individuals to release each year, and fully account for the interactions among genetic adaptation to captivity, population regulation, and life-history variation.
© 2018 Society for Conservation Biology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adaptación genética; artificial selection; captivity; cautiverio; domesticación; domestication; genetic adaptation; selección artificial; suplemento; supplementation; 人工选择; 圈养; 补充; 遗传适应; 驯化

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30168872     DOI: 10.1111/cobi.13217

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conserv Biol        ISSN: 0888-8892            Impact factor:   6.560


  7 in total

1.  Anthropogenic habitat alteration leads to rapid loss of adaptive variation and restoration potential in wild salmon populations.

Authors:  Tasha Q Thompson; M Renee Bellinger; Sean M O'Rourke; Daniel J Prince; Alexander E Stevenson; Antonia T Rodrigues; Matthew R Sloat; Camilla F Speller; Dongya Y Yang; Virginia L Butler; Michael A Banks; Michael R Miller
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Blood transcriptome analysis revealed the immune changes and immunological adaptation of wildness training giant pandas.

Authors:  Miao Yang; Yan Huang; Honglin Wu; Caiwu Li; Shanshan Ling; Jie Sun; Haibo Shen; Bisong Yue; Xiuyue Zhang
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 3.291

Review 3.  Evolutionary principles guiding amphibian conservation.

Authors:  Maciej Pabijan; Gemma Palomar; Bernardo Antunes; Weronika Antoł; Piotr Zieliński; Wiesław Babik
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2020-03-13       Impact factor: 5.183

4.  Conservation through the lens of (mal)adaptation: Concepts and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alison Margaret Derry; Dylan J Fraser; Steven P Brady; Louis Astorg; Elizabeth R Lawrence; Gillian K Martin; Jean-Michel Matte; Jorge Octavio Negrín Dastis; Antoine Paccard; Rowan D H Barrett; Lauren J Chapman; Jeffrey E Lane; Chase G Ballas; Marissa Close; Erika Crispo
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2019-04-06       Impact factor: 5.183

5.  Multiple decades of stocking has resulted in limited hatchery introgression in wild brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) populations of Nova Scotia.

Authors:  Sarah J Lehnert; Shauna M Baillie; John MacMillan; Ian G Paterson; Colin F Buhariwalla; Ian R Bradbury; Paul Bentzen
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 5.183

6.  Effects of captivity, diet, and relocation on the gut bacterial communities of white-footed mice.

Authors:  Pauline van Leeuwen; Nadia Mykytczuk; Gabriela F Mastromonaco; Albrecht I Schulte-Hostedde
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  Releases of Asian houbara must respect genetic and geographic origin to preserve inherited migration behaviour: evidence from a translocation experiment.

Authors:  Robert J Burnside; Claire Buchan; Daniel Salliss; Nigel J Collar; Paul M Dolman
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 2.963

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.