Literature DB >> 30168761

Glenosphere design affects range of movement and risk of friction-type scapular impingement in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

B S Werner1, J Chaoui2, G Walch3.   

Abstract

Aims: Scapular notching is a frequently observed radiographic phenomenon in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA), signifying impingement of components. The purposes of this study were to evaluate the effect of glenoid component size and glenosphere type on impingement-free range of movement (ROM) for extension and internal and external rotation in a virtual RSA model, and to determine the optimal configuration to reduce the incidence of friction-type scapular notching. Materials and
Methods: Preoperative CT scans obtained in 21 patients (three male, 18 female) with primary osteoarthritis were analyzed using modelling software. Two concurrent factors were tested for impingement-free ROM and translation of the centre of rotation: glenosphere diameter (36 mm vs 39 mm) and type (centred, 2 mm inferior eccentric offset, 10° inferior tilt).
Results: Glenosphere size was most predictive of increased extension and external rotation, whereas lateralization of the centre of rotation was the most predictive factor for internal rotation. A larger diameter of glenosphere combined with a 10° tilted configuration demonstrated superior values for extension and external rotation, whereas the eccentric component improved internal rotation by a mean 8.9° (standard deviation 2.7°) compared with a standard concentric glenosphere.
Conclusion: Glenosphere configuration can be modified to increase range of movement in RSA. Friction-type scapular notching was most effectively reduced by use of a large-diameter glenosphere with 10° inferior tilt. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:1182-6.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Finite element study; Glenosphere diameter; Implant configuration; Range of movement; Reverse shoulder arthroplasty; Scapular notching

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30168761     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.100B9.BJJ-2018-0264.R1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Joint J        ISSN: 2049-4394            Impact factor:   5.082


  14 in total

Review 1.  Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: Biomechanics and Indications.

Authors:  Caitlin M Rugg; Monica J Coughlan; Drew A Lansdown
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2019-12

Review 2.  Advances and Update on Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Stephen G Thon; Adam J Seidl; Jonathan T Bravman; Eric C McCarty; Felix H Savoie; Rachel M Frank
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2020-02

3.  Clinical implications of scapular notching at 2 and 5-year follow-up after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Robert J Shelley; Mikalyn T DeFoor; Stephen A Parada; Lynn A Crosby
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2020-08-19

4.  Preoperative external rotation deficit does not predict poor outcomes or lack of improvement after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Moby Parsons; Howard D Routman; Christopher P Roche; Richard J Friedman
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2020-08-22

5.  Tomographic Analysis of Positioning of Reverse Baseplates Positioning.

Authors:  Alexandre Almeida; Daniel C Agostini; Pietro Ft Nesello; Nayvaldo C de Almeida; Rafael Mioso; Ana Paula Agostini
Journal:  J Shoulder Elb Arthroplast       Date:  2021-02-15

Review 6.  [Fracture analysis, indication for endoprosthesis and implant selection in proximal humeral fractures].

Authors:  M Kimmeyer; V Rentschler; J Schmalzl; C Gerhardt; L J Lehmann
Journal:  Unfallchirurgie (Heidelb)       Date:  2022-07-14

7.  Radiographic geometry and clinical glenohumeral range of motion after reverse shoulder athroplasty, a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Kaisa Lehtimäki; Jenni Harjula; Joonas Uurinmäki; Juha Kukkonen; Eliisa Löyttyniemi; Jari Mokka; Hannu Tiusanen; Ville Äärimaa
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2021-05-24

8.  Effect of critical shoulder angle, glenoid lateralization, and humeral inclination on range of movement in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Alexandre Lädermann; Eileen Tay; Philippe Collin; Sébastien Piotton; Chih-Hao Chiu; Aude Michelet; Caecilia Charbonnier
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 5.853

9.  Adjusting Implant Size and Position Can Improve Internal Rotation After Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty in a Three-dimensional Computational Model.

Authors:  Eric G Huish; George S Athwal; Lionel Neyton; Gilles Walch
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 4.755

10.  Clinical comparison of humeral-lateralization reverse total shoulder arthroplasty between patients with irreparable rotator cuff tear and patients with cuff tear arthropathy.

Authors:  Jae-Hoo Lee; Yong-Min Chun; Doo-Sup Kim; Doo-Hyung Lee; Sang-Jin Shin
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2020-06-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.