Literature DB >> 30168595

Sex differences in the prognosis after surgery for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma.

Joonas H Kauppila1,2, Karl Wahlin1, Pernilla Lagergren3, Jesper Lagergren1,4.   

Abstract

Some investigations suggest a better prognosis in women compared to men with esophageal cancer but these differences are uncertain. The aim of our study was to clarify whether sex influences the prognosis after esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and esophageal adenocarcinoma. A population-based and nationwide cohort study included almost all patients who underwent esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in Sweden in 1987-2010, with follow-up until 2016. Patients' sex was analyzed in relation to risk of mortality. Multivariable Cox regression provided hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI), adjusted for calendar period, age, education, comorbidity, tumor stage, neoadjuvant therapy, and surgeon volume. Among 1,816 participants, 1,024 (56%) had esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (355 [35%] women), and 792 (44%) had esophageal adenocarcinoma (103 [13%] women). Compared to men, women had a decreased overall all-cause mortality in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (HR = 0.73, 95% CI 0.63-0.85). Stratified analyses showed decreased mortality limited to women aged >55 years (HR = 0.71, 95% CI 0.61-0.83), but in all tumor stages, particularly stages 0-I (HR = 0.54, 95% CI 0.37-0.79). Women also had decreased 90-day all-cause mortality, 5-year all-cause mortality, and 5-year disease-specific mortality in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma compared to men. For esophageal adenocarcinoma, no sex differences were found for any of the mortality outcomes. Thus, women who undergo esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma seem to have better prognosis than men, especially those with early tumor stages, whereas no sex differences in prognosis were found for esophageal adenocarcinoma.
© 2018 UICC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  esophagus; gender; mortality; neoplasm; prognosis; sex; surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30168595     DOI: 10.1002/ijc.31840

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  13 in total

1.  Effect of sex on survival after resection of oesophageal cancer: nationwide cohort study.

Authors:  Ji Zhang; Rino Bellocco; Weimin Ye; Jan Johansson; Magnus Nilsson; Mats Lindblad
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2022-05-02

2.  Nomogram predicting cancer-specific mortality in patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma: a competing risk analysis.

Authors:  Xi-Xi Wu; Ren-Pin Chen; Rui-Cong Chen; Hong-Peng Gong; Bin-Feng Wang; Ya-Ling Li; Xin-Ran Lin; Zhi-Ming Huang
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Feasibility and effectiveness of multi-injection thoracic paravertebral block via the intrathoracic approach for analgesia after thoracoscopic-laparoscopic esophagectomy.

Authors:  Lihong Hu; Xia Xu; Weiyu Shen; Jinxian He
Journal:  Esophagus       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 4.230

4.  Sex-Associated Gene Expression Alterations Correlate With Esophageal Cancer Survival.

Authors:  Nathaniel Weygant; Karen Chang; Christian S Jackson; Kenneth J Vega
Journal:  Clin Transl Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-12-18       Impact factor: 4.488

5.  Short-course compared to long-course palliative radiotherapy for oesophageal cancer: a single centre observational cohort study.

Authors:  Halla Sif Ólafsdóttir; Fredrik Klevebro; Nelson Ndegwa; Gabriella Alexandersson von Döbeln
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-08-16       Impact factor: 3.481

6.  Novel genomic alteration in superficial esophageal squamous cell neoplasms in non-smoker non-drinker females.

Authors:  Yusuke Onozato; Yu Sasaki; Yasuhiko Abe; Hidenori Sato; Makoto Yagi; Naoko Mizumoto; Takashi Kon; Takayuki Sakai; Minami Ito; Matsuki Umehara; Ayumi Koseki; Yoshiyuki Ueno
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-11       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Sex differences in esophageal cancer overall and by histological subtype.

Authors:  Nickolas Stabellini; Apoorva Krishna Chandar; Amitabh Chak; Amie J Barda; Mantas Dmukauskas; Kristin Waite; Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 4.996

8.  Clinical impact of abdominal versus mediastinal metastases as a prognostic factor for poor outcomes following esophageal cancer surgery: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Yutaka Miyawaki; Hiroshi Sato; Shuichiro Oya; Hirofumi Sugita; Yasumitsu Hirano; Shinichi Sakuramoto; Kojun Okamotom; Shigeki Yamaguchim; Isamu Koyama
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  Efficacy and Safety of Continuous Paravertebral Block after Minimally Invasive Radical Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer.

Authors:  Shifa Zhang; Hongfeng Liu; Haibo Cai
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 3.037

10.  The predictive and prognostic value of sex in localized colorectal cancer: a SEER-based analysis.

Authors:  Bin Ma; Yongmin Li; Qingkai Meng
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2021-05       Impact factor: 1.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.