Literature DB >> 30167814

Achieving international consensus on the assessment of psoriatic arthritis in psoriasis clinical trials: an International Dermatology Outcome Measures (IDEOM) initiative.

Lourdes Maria Perez-Chada1, Jeffrey M Cohen2, Alice Bendix Gottlieb3, Kristina Callis Duffin4, Amit Garg5, John Latella6, April Wang Armstrong7, Alexis Ogdie8, Joseph Frank Merola9,10.   

Abstract

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is rarely assessed in psoriasis randomized controlled trials (RCT); thus, the effect of psoriasis therapy on PsA is unknown. The International Dermatology Outcome Measures (IDEOM) has included "PsA Symptoms" as part of the core domains to be measured in psoriasis RCT. This study aimed to achieve consensus about screening for PsA and how to measure for "PsA Symptoms" in psoriasis RCT. At the IDEOM 2017 Annual Meeting, stakeholders voted on the role of PsA screening in psoriasis RCT. To select measures for "PsA Symptoms", we adapted the Consensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) guidelines. Three potential measures were selected. At the meeting, stakeholders voted on the validity, feasibility, and responsiveness of these measures. Of the 47 stakeholders, 93% voted that all psoriasis trial participants should be screened for PsA. "PsA Symptoms" measures included Patient Global (PG)-arthritis, Routine Assessment Patient Index Data (RAPID)-3, and Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease (PsAID)-9. During the voting, more than 50% of the voters agreed that RAPID3 and PsAID9 were good measures for PsA Symptoms, able to capture all its essential elements. PsAID9 was considered the most feasible instrument, followed by RAPID3 and PG-arthritis, respectively. Finally, most participants agreed that RAPID3 and PsAID9 were responsive measures. Most study participants voted that all subjects in a psoriasis clinical trial should be screened for PsA. RAPID3 and PsAID9 outperformed PG-arthritis in measuring PsA Symptoms. This will be followed by a Delphi survey involving a larger stakeholder group.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical trials; Patient-reported outcome measures; Psoriatic arthritis; Psychometric; Screening

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30167814     DOI: 10.1007/s00403-018-1855-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Dermatol Res        ISSN: 0340-3696            Impact factor:   3.017


  4 in total

Review 1.  International Dermatology Outcome Measures (IDEOM): Report from the 2020 Annual Meeting.

Authors:  Alison H Kohn; Afsaneh Alavi; April W Armstrong; Folawiyo Babalola; Amit Garg; Alice B Gottlieb; Lesley Grilli; Gregor Borut Ernst Jemec; John Latella; Kendall Marcus; Joseph F Merola; Alex G Ortega-Loayza; Daniel M Siegel; Vibeke Strand; Jerry K L Tan; Lourdes M Perez-Chada
Journal:  Dermatology       Date:  2021-09-17       Impact factor: 5.197

Review 2.  Report from the International Dermatology Outcome Measures Initiative.

Authors:  Lourdes M Perez-Chada; Joseph F Merola; April W Armstrong; Amit Garg; John Latella; Alice B Gottlieb
Journal:  J Investig Dermatol Symp Proc       Date:  2020-11

3.  Improvements and advances in core outcome set methodology: proceedings of the CS-COUSIN & COMFA Joint Meeting.

Authors:  McKenzie A Dirr; Murad Alam; Christian Apfelbacher; Karl-Philipp Drewitz; Bianca Y Kang; Daniel Munblit; Nikita Nekliudov; Nina Seylanova
Journal:  Arch Dermatol Res       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 3.017

Review 4.  Telemedicine and psoriatic arthritis: best practices and considerations for dermatologists and rheumatologists.

Authors:  Alice B Gottlieb; Alvin F Wells; Joseph F Merola
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 3.650

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.